Literature DB >> 23730758

Multi-level sexual selection: individual and family-level selection for mating success in a historical human population.

Jacob A Moorad1.   

Abstract

Precopulatory sexual selection is the association between fitness and traits associated with mate acquisition. Although sexual selection is generally recognized to be a powerful evolutionary force, most investigations are limited to characters belonging to individuals. A broader multilevel perspective acknowledges that individual fitness can be affected by aspects of mating success that are characters of groups, such as families. Parental mating success in polygynous or polyandrous human societies may exemplify traits under group-level sexual selection. Using fitness measures that account for age-structure, I measure multilevel selection for mate number over 55 years in a human population with declining rates of polygyny. Sexual selection had three components: individual-level selection for ever-mating (whether an individual mated) and individual- and family-level selection for polyandry and polygyny. Family- and individual-level selection for polygyny was equally strong, three times stronger than family-level selection for polyandry and more than an order of magnitude stronger than individual-level selection for polyandry. However, individual-level selection for polyandry and polygyny was more effective at explaining relative fitness variance than family-level selection. Selection for ever-mating was the most important source of sexual selection for fitness; variation for ever-mating explained 23% of relative fitness variance.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23730758      PMCID: PMC3675801          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  31 in total

1.  Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity.

Authors:  A G Jones; J C Avise
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Polygynous fertility: sexual competition versus progeny.

Authors:  D L Anderton; R J Emigh
Journal:  AJS       Date:  1989

3.  The polygyny-fertility hypothesis: a re-evaluation.

Authors:  L L Bean; G P Mineau
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1986-03

4.  Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man.

Authors:  J F CROW
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1958-02       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  Polygyny and fertility in nineteenth-century America.

Authors:  J E Smith; P R Kunz
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1976

6.  Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection.

Authors:  Erika I Hersch; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Sexual selection: harem size and the variance in male reproductive success.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Stephen M Shulter
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; William M Muir; Johan A M Van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Paternal investment and the human mating system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Estimating the strength of sexual selection from Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA diversity.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Stephen M Shuster
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  Synergy from reproductive division of labor and genetic complexity drive the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Klaus Jaffe
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.365

2.  Individual fitness and phenotypic selection in age-structured populations with constant growth rates.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Selection gradients, the opportunity for selection, and the coefficient of determination.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  A demographic transition altered the strength of selection for fitness and age-specific survival and fertility in a 19th century American population.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Kin and multilevel selection in social evolution: a never-ending controversy?

Authors:  Jos Kramer; Joël Meunier
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-04-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.