Literature DB >> 24933826

Individual fitness and phenotypic selection in age-structured populations with constant growth rates.

Jacob A Moorad.   

Abstract

Powerful multiple regression-based approaches are commonly used to measure the strength of phenotypic selection, which is the statistical association between individual fitness and trait values. Age structure and overlapping generations complicate determinations of individual fitness, contributing to the popularity of alternative methods for measuring natural selection that do not depend upon such measures. The application of regression-based techniques for measuring selection in these situations requires a demographically appropriate, conceptually sound, and observable measure of individual fitness. It has been suggested that Fisher's reproductive value applied to an individual at its birth is such a definition. Here I offer support for this assertion by showing that multiple regression applied to this measure and vital rates (age-specific survival and fertility rates) yields the same selection gradients for vital rates as those inferred from Hamilton's classical results. I discuss how multiple regressions, applied to individual reproductive value at birth, can be used efficiently to estimate measures of phenotypic selection that are problematic for sensitivity analyses. These include nonlinear selection, components of the opportunity for selection, and multilevel selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933826      PMCID: PMC4275841          DOI: 10.1890/13-0778.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  30 in total

1.  Fisher, Medawar, Hamilton and the evolution of aging.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Patterns of age-specific means and genetic variances of mortality rates predicted by the mutation-accumulation theory of ageing.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Perspective: Here's to Fisher, additive genetic variance, and the fundamental theorem of natural selection.

Authors:  James F Crow
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man.

Authors:  J F CROW
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1958-02       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection.

Authors:  Erika I Hersch; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Hamilton's indicators of the force of selection.

Authors:  Annette Baudisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Estimating individual contributions to population growth: evolutionary fitness in ecological time.

Authors:  T Coulson; T G Benton; P Lundberg; S R X Dall; B E Kendall; J-M Gaillard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth.

Authors:  Ruth G Shaw; Charles J Geyer; Stuart Wagenius; Helen H Hangelbroek; Julie R Etterson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  A test for epistasis among induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A D Peters; P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary Ecology of Senescence and a Reassessment of Williams' 'Extrinsic Mortality' Hypothesis.

Authors:  Jacob Moorad; Daniel Promislow; Jonathan Silvertown
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  What is the best fitness measure in wild populations? A case study on the power of short-term fitness proxies to predict reproductive value.

Authors:  Živa Alif; Jamie Dunning; Heung Ying Janet Chik; Terry Burke; Julia Schroeder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Evolution of maternal effect senescence.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Daniel H Nussey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Asynchrony of senescence among phenotypic traits in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  Adam D Hayward; Jacob Moorad; Charlotte E Regan; Camillo Berenos; Jill G Pilkington; Josephine M Pemberton; Daniel H Nussey
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.032

5.  Extrinsic Mortality Can Shape Life-History Traits, Including Senescence.

Authors:  Maciej J Dańko; Oskar Burger; Krzysztof Argasiński; Jan Kozłowski
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.119

6.  The selection force weakens with age because ageing evolves and not vice versa.

Authors:  Stefano Giaimo; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.