Literature DB >> 23730434

Giving feedback on clinical skills: are we starving our young?

Peter A M Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Feedback to clinical learners about their performance is crucial to their development into competent clinicians. Most feedback is provided by clinicians who have little or no formal training for this aspect of their teaching role.
METHOD: Narrative review.
FINDINGS: Feedback is most effective if provided by clinical mentors based on observations of behavior, with emphasis on correctable deficiencies. The difference between feedback, which is formative, and evaluation, which is summative, needs to be understood by both the giver and receiver. The ability to self-assess is an important related concept, with studies showing that self-assessment skills are lowest in individuals found to be the least competent in external assessments and in individuals with a high level of confidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Feedback is an important component in learners' development, and clinical faculty should be educated about the importance of providing feedback, and the means to do so effectively must be provided to them. Despite several decades of accumulated knowledge in this area, the evidence from learners is that we continue to starve them of this critical nutrient for their growth.

Year:  2012        PMID: 23730434      PMCID: PMC3399605          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-000295.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  19 in total

1.  The adult learner: a mythical species.

Authors:  G R Norman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills.

Authors:  Mark C Porte; George Xeroulis; Richard K Reznick; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind.

Authors:  Richard K Reznick; Helen MacRae
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karen Mann; Jill Gordon; Anna MacLeod
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 5.  State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback.

Authors:  Julian C Archer
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Getting beyond "Good job": how to give effective feedback.

Authors:  Joseph Gigante; Michael Dell; Angela Sharkey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review.

Authors:  David A Davis; Paul E Mazmanian; Michael Fordis; R Van Harrison; Kevin E Thorpe; Laure Perrier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Menachery; Amy M Knight; Ken Kolodner; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques.

Authors:  M G Hewson; M L Little
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva; Heather Armson; Eric Holmboe; Jocelyn Lockyer; Elaine Loney; Karen Mann; Joan Sargeant
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.853

View more
  22 in total

1.  Paperwork versus patient care: a nationwide survey of residents' perceptions of clinical documentation requirements and patient care.

Authors:  Melissa A Christino; Andrew P Matson; Staci A Fischer; Steven E Reinert; Christopher W Digiovanni; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

2.  Capsule Commentary on Jackson et al., The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Subha Ramani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Karen D Könings; Shiphra Ginsburg; Cees Pm van der Vleuten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Milestone Implementation's Impact on Narrative Comments and Perception of Feedback for Internal Medicine Residents: a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Sonja E Raaum; Katie Lappe; Jorie M Colbert-Getz; Caroline K Milne
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Cynthia Kay; Wilkins C Jackson; Michael Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Exploring Perspectives from Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors in the USA on Effective Narrative Evaluation: Results from the CDIM National Survey.

Authors:  Robert Ledford; Alfred Burger; Jeff LaRochelle; Farina Klocksieben; Deborah DeWaay; Kevin E O'Brien
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-10-25

7.  Overcoming barriers to effective feedback: a solution-focused faculty development approach.

Authors:  Samar McCutcheon; Anne-Marie Duchemin
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-23

8.  The Impact of Converting From an 'Educator-Driven' to a 'Learner-Initiated' Feedback Model.

Authors:  Britany L Raymond; Leslie C Fowler; Amy C Robertson
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 9.  Feedback and Assessment Tools for Handoffs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joshua Davis; Catherine Roach; Cater Elliott; Matthew Mardis; Ellen M Justice; Lee Ann Riesenberg
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-02

10.  Methods to Improve Diagnostic Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Education in the Clinical Setting: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hongyun Xu; Benson W G Ang; Jian Yi Soh; Gominda G Ponnamperuma
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.