Literature DB >> 21242222

Getting beyond "Good job": how to give effective feedback.

Joseph Gigante1, Michael Dell, Angela Sharkey.   

Abstract

This article is the fourth in a series by the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics (COMSEP) reviewing the critical attributes and skills of superb clinical teachers. The previous article in this series reviewed the vital importance of direct observation of students.(1) The purpose of this article is to describe how to use the information gained from the direct observation, namely the role of feedback. Although too often used interchangeably, encouragement, evaluation, and feedback are quite distinct. Encouragement (eg, "good job!") is supportive but does nothing to improve the learner's skills. Evaluation is summative and is the final judgment of the learner's performance. Feedback, however, is designed to improve future performance. This article focuses on feedback-what it is, why it is important, some of the barriers to effective feedback, and how to give helpful feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242222     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  12 in total

1.  Medical student self-efficacy with family-centered care during bedside rounds.

Authors:  Henry N Young; Jayna B Schumacher; Megan A Moreno; Roger L Brown; Ted D Sigrest; Gwen K McIntosh; Daniel J Schumacher; Michelle M Kelly; Elizabeth D Cox
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Giving feedback on clinical skills: are we starving our young?

Authors:  Peter A M Anderson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-06

3.  Using Small Case-Based Learning Groups as a Setting for Teaching Medical Students How to Provide and Receive Peer Feedback.

Authors:  Emily C Bird; Neil Osheroff; Cathleen C Pettepher; William B Cutrer; Robert H Carnahan
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2017-09-20

4.  Daily Evaluation Cards Are Superior for Student Assessment Compared to Single Rater In-Training Evaluations.

Authors:  James Johnston; Maury Pinsk
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12-12

5.  Narrative Feedback to Family Medicine Faculty: A Content Analysis.

Authors:  Linda Myerholtz; Hannah M Baker; Emily M Hawes; Mallory McClester Brown; Catherine Coe; Lisa K Rollins; Cristen P Page
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2022-04-21

6.  Converting to Connect: A Rapid RE-AIM Evaluation of the Digital Conversion of a Clerkship Curriculum in the Age of COVID-19.

Authors:  Alim Nagji; Yusuf Yilmaz; Peter Zhang; Joana Dida; Lauren Cook-Chaimowitz; Junghwan Kevin Dong; Lorraine Colpitts; James Beecroft; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-08-09

7.  Feedback in the nonshifting context of the midwifery clinical education in Indonesia: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Esti Nugraheny; Mora Claramita; Gandes R Rahayu; Amitya Kumara
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

8.  Use of Lot quality assurance sampling surveys to evaluate community health worker performance in rural Zambia: a case of Luangwa district.

Authors:  Moses Mwanza; Japhet Zulu; Stephanie M Topp; Patrick Musonda; Wilbroad Mutale; Roma Chilengi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians.

Authors:  Alan David Kaye; Olutoyin J Okanlawon; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-05-03

10.  A Randomized Trial of SMART Goal Enhanced Debriefing after Simulation to Promote Educational Actions.

Authors:  Amish Aghera; Matt Emery; Richard Bounds; Colleen Bush; R Brent Stansfield; Brian Gillett; Sally A Santen
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.