Literature DB >> 18245580

Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected].

Kevin C Owsley1, John T Gorczyca.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fixation of proximal humeral fractures is challenging. Locking plate technology offers mechanical advantages for treating unstable fractures in weak bone. In this study, we assessed the radiographic and clinical results of a single surgeon's experience treating proximal humeral fractures with a locked proximal humeral plate.
METHODS: Fifty-three adult patients with a displaced proximal humeral fracture were treated with a proximal humeral locking plate over a forty-five-month period. A standard postoperative rehabilitation regimen was followed. Radiographs were made at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and one year and were examined for fracture alignment, fracture displacement, hardware position, and healing. Postoperative outcomes were collected with questionnaires.
RESULTS: Fifty-two (98%) of the fifty-three fractures healed by six months. Nineteen patients (36%) had radiographic signs of a complication, including screw cutout with intra-articular displacement in twelve (23%), substantial (>10 degrees ) varus displacement in thirteen (25%), and osteonecrosis in two (4%). These radiographic signs of a complication occurred in twelve (57%) of twenty-one patients older than sixty years of age and in seven (22%) of thirty-two patients under sixty years of age (p = 0.0015). Screw cutout occurred in nine (43%) of the twenty-one patients older than sixty years. Patients with a complication had worse functional outcomes as measured with the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (p < 0.05) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (p < 0.001) questionnaires. We were unable to demonstrate a relationship between fracture type and complications. Revision surgery was performed in seven (13%) of the fifty-three patients. There were no cases of infection, nerve injury, or hardware failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of locking plates in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures is associated with an unexpectedly high rate of screw cutout and revision surgery, especially in patients older than sixty years who have a three or four-part fracture. The indications for open reduction and internal fixation in these patients require continued analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18245580     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  110 in total

1.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty in the management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Robert Thorsness; James Iannuzzi; Katia Noyes; Stephen Kates; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Short-term and long-term orthopaedic issues in patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  Susan V Bukata; Stephen L Kates; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Fractures of the humerus head].

Authors:  M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Maier; K Reising; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Classifications in brief: the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Bradley C Carofino; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Technique and value of arthroscopic implant removal in the shoulder].

Authors:  H Lill; C Katthagen; C Voigt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Can the osteosynthesis with locking plates be a better treatment for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus?

Authors:  M A Verdano; E Lunini; A Pellegrini; T Corsini; P Marenghi; F Ceccarelli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-06-08

7.  Arthroscopic removal of proximal humerus locking plates.

Authors:  Joshua S Dines; Carolyn M Hettrich; Bryan T Kelly; Felix H Savoie; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Authors:  Brandon J Kelly; Chad M Myeroff
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

9.  [Prostheses for fractures of the proximal humerus: presentation of current results of anatomical fracture shoulder prosthesis under consideration of alternative concepts].

Authors:  G Pape; L Tonne; P Raiss; M Loew; F Zeifang
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  The use of locking plates in proximal humeral fractures: Comparison of outcome by patient age and fracture pattern.

Authors:  Michael Leonard; Leibo Mokotedi; Uthman Alao; Aaron Glynn; Mark Dolan; Pat Fleming
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.