Literature DB >> 21968245

Benefits and harms of locking plate osteosynthesis in intraarticular (OTA Type C) fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review.

Stig Brorson1, Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen, Lars Henrik Frich, Bo Sanderhoff Olsen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Locking plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures are widely recommended and used, even in complex intraarticular fracture patterns such as AO/OTA Type C fractures. We systematically reviewed clinical studies assessing the benefits and harms of osteosynthesis with angle stable plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures of the proximal humerus.
METHODS: We conducted an iterative search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cinahl, and PEDro in all languages from 1999 to November 2010. Eligible studies should study the outcome for Type C fractures after primary osteosynthesis with locking plate within two weeks of injury, and a follow-up period of six months or more. Patients should be evaluated with the Constant-Murley Score (CS). Two observers extracted data independently.
RESULTS: Twelve studies and 282 Type C fractures were included. Results were categorised according to study type and synthesised qualitatively. No randomised clinical trials were identified. Two comparative, observational studies reported a mean CS of 71 (relative to contralateral shoulder) and 75 (non-adjusted Constant Score) for Type C fractures. For all studies mean non-adjusted CS ranged from 53 to 75. Mean age- and sex-adjusted CS ranged from 60 to 88. Mean CS relative to the contralateral shoulder ranged from 71 to 85. The most common complications were avascular necrosis (range, 4-33%), screw perforations (range, 5-20%), loss of fixation (range, 3-16%), impingement (range, 7-11%) and infections range 4-19%. Reoperation rate ranged from 6 to 44%.
CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient study designs and unclear reporting preclude safe treatment recommendations. Complication and reoperation rates were unexpected high. Based on the studies included we cannot routinely recommend the use of locking plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21968245     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  20 in total

1.  Shoulder function after helical long PHILOS plate.

Authors:  Tomas Da Silva; Franziska Rummel; Christian Knop; Tobias Merkle
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-02-24

2.  [Treatment of proximal humeral fractures in Germany: Influence of the level of hospital care and the frequency of treatment].

Authors:  A Tepass; K Weise; B Rolauffs; G Blumenstock; C Bahrs
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Surgical management of complex proximal humeral fractures: pinning, locked plate and arthroplasty : Clinical results and functional outcome on retrospective series of patients.

Authors:  I Repetto; M Alessio-Mazzola; P Cerruti; F Sanguineti; M Formica; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-01-24

Review 4.  ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Klaus W Wendt; Martin Jaeger; Jan Verbruggen; Stefaan Nijs; Hans-Jörg Oestern; Richard Kdolsky; Radko Komadina
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures: comparison of interlocking plate fixation versus minimal invasive techniques.

Authors:  Felix Bachelier; Antonius Pizanis; Julia Schwitalla; Tim Pohlemann; Dieter Kohn; Reiner Wirbel
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-01

6.  [Elective and acute procedures in trauma surgery. Complications requiring revision].

Authors:  W Schneiders; S Lamping; S Rammelt; A Olbrich; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a systemic review of 409 patients.

Authors:  Antti P Launonen; Vesa Lepola; Tapio Flinkkilä; Minna Laitinen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Meta-analysis of locking plate versus intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Guoqi Wang; Zhi Mao; Lihai Zhang; Licheng Zhang; Yanpeng Zhao; Peng Yin; Ling Gao; Peifu Tang; Hongjun Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Comparison between minimally invasive, percutaneous osteosynthesis and locking plate osteosynthesis in 3-and 4-part proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Reinhold Ortmaier; Verena Filzmaier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Robert Bogner; Thomas Neubauer; Herbert Resch; Alexander Auffarth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Least Possible Fixation Techniques of 4-Part Valgus Impacted Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andreas Panagopoulos; Irini Tatani; Dimitrios Ntourantonis; Ioannis Seferlis; Antonis Kouzelis; Minos Tyllianakis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2016-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.