Literature DB >> 18317048

Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates.

Kenneth A Egol1, Crispin C Ong, Michael Walsh, Laith M Jazrawi, Nirmal C Tejwani, Joseph D Zuckerman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine our incidence of early complications that occur using the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) and to determine the contributing factors.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty-one consecutive patients treated with a proximal humerus locking plate. OUTCOME: Development of an intraoperative, acute postoperative, or delayed postoperative complication.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking plate between February 2003 and January 2006 at our institution. Fifty-one fractures or fracture nonunions were identified in 18 male and 33 female patients with an average age of 61. All acute injuries were treated with a similar protocol of open reduction internal fixation with the PHILOS plate followed by early range of shoulder motion. Nonunions were treated in a similar manner with the addition of iliac crest bone graft placement. Patients were objectively assessed on their outcome by physical as well as radiological examination. All complications were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed to determine if patient age, fracture type, or number of screws placed in the humeral head contributed to complications.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were available for minimum 6-month follow-up (mean, 16 months; range, 6 to 45 months). Radiographically, 92% of the cases united at 3 months after surgery, and 2 fractures had signs of osteonecrosis at latest follow-up. Sixteen complications were seen in 12 patients (24%). Eight shoulders in eight patients (16%) had screws that penetrated the humeral head. Two patients developed osteonecrosis at latest follow-up. One acute fracture and one nonunion failed to unite after index surgery. Significant heterotopic bone developed in 1 patient. Early implant failure occurred in 2 patients; one was revised to a longer plate, and one underwent resection arthroplasty. There was one acute postoperative infection.
CONCLUSION: The major complication reported in this study was screw penetration, suggesting that exceptional vigilance must be taken in estimating the appropriate number and length of screws used to prevent articular penetration; although the device provides exceptional fixation stability, its indication must be scrutinized for each individual patient, taking the extent of trauma/fracture and age into consideration and carefully weighing it against other forms of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317048     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  53 in total

1.  Comparison of two different locking plates for two-, three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures--results of an international multicentre study.

Authors:  Gerhard Konrad; Anja Hirschmüller; Laurent Audige; Simon Lambert; Ralf Hertel; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures: one-year results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Matteo Papalia; Alessandro Greco; Antonio Teti; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Filippo Casella; Stefano Necozione
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reverse shoulder prosthesis as revision surgery after fractures of the proximal humerus, treated initially by internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicola Lollino; Paolo Paladini; Fabrizio Campi; Giovanni Merolla; Paolo Rossi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04

4.  Arthroscopic removal of proximal humerus locking plates.

Authors:  Joshua S Dines; Carolyn M Hettrich; Bryan T Kelly; Felix H Savoie; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Surgical versus conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Fu; Chengyan Xia; Zonghuan Li; Hua Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

6.  Locking plates versus intramedullary nails in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Wei Ge; Gen Li; Jiezhou Wu; Guanghua Lu; Ming Cai; Shaohua Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Three-dimensional analyses of proximal humeral fractures using computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction: early stability of fixation after osteosynthesis in relation to preoperative bone quality.

Authors:  Koki Ueda; Satoshi Ikemura; Akihisa Yamashita; Takashi Harada; Tetsuya Watanabe; Kenzo Shirasawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-17

8.  The use of locking plates in proximal humeral fractures: Comparison of outcome by patient age and fracture pattern.

Authors:  Michael Leonard; Leibo Mokotedi; Uthman Alao; Aaron Glynn; Mark Dolan; Pat Fleming
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2009-10

9.  Non-operative treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus: results of a prospective and retrospective multicentric study.

Authors:  Romain Bouchet; Damien Block; Thomas D'ollonne; François Gadea; Julia Gaillot; François Sirveaux; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Proximal humeral fractures: an understanding of the ideal plate positioning.

Authors:  Pedro José Labronici; Rodrigo Pires e Albuquerque; Vinícius Schott; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Willian Dias Belangero; José Sérgio Franco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.