PURPOSE: The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is becoming more attractive given its favourable side effect profile and autologous nature, leading to rapid clinical adoption in the absence of high-level evidence. We are presenting three patients who developed a progression of patellar tendinitis following treatment, which to our knowledge is the first report of worsening of patellar tendinitis following PRP therapy. METHODS: The records of three patients with symptom exacerbation of patellar tendinitis following treatment with PRP were reviewed. IRB exemption was obtained. Clinical and operative records, radiographs, and MR imaging were reviewed for all patients. RESULTS: Three patients reported to our clinic for a second opinion with symptoms of anterior knee pain consistent with patellar tendinitis. Each patient had previously been treated with PRP therapy due to prolonged symptoms. Clinical and radiological findings following treatment included patellar tendon thickening, worsening pain, discontinuation of athletic participation in all three patients, and osteolysis of the distal pole of the patella in one patient identified during surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Growing interest in the use of autologous products for the management of chronic tendinopathies has led to widespread clinical implementation with minimal scientific support. It is tempting to apply a new treatment for management of a difficult clinical entity, especially when the risk/benefit ratio appears favourable. However, caution must be exercised as unexpected results may be encountered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case reports, level V.
PURPOSE: The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is becoming more attractive given its favourable side effect profile and autologous nature, leading to rapid clinical adoption in the absence of high-level evidence. We are presenting three patients who developed a progression of patellar tendinitis following treatment, which to our knowledge is the first report of worsening of patellar tendinitis following PRP therapy. METHODS: The records of three patients with symptom exacerbation of patellar tendinitis following treatment with PRP were reviewed. IRB exemption was obtained. Clinical and operative records, radiographs, and MR imaging were reviewed for all patients. RESULTS: Three patients reported to our clinic for a second opinion with symptoms of anterior knee pain consistent with patellar tendinitis. Each patient had previously been treated with PRP therapy due to prolonged symptoms. Clinical and radiological findings following treatment included patellar tendon thickening, worsening pain, discontinuation of athletic participation in all three patients, and osteolysis of the distal pole of the patella in one patient identified during surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Growing interest in the use of autologous products for the management of chronic tendinopathies has led to widespread clinical implementation with minimal scientific support. It is tempting to apply a new treatment for management of a difficult clinical entity, especially when the risk/benefit ratio appears favourable. However, caution must be exercised as unexpected results may be encountered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case reports, level V.
Authors: Scott A Rodeo; Demetris Delos; Riley J Williams; Ronald S Adler; Andrew Pearle; Russell F Warren Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jason W Hammond; Richard Y Hinton; Leigh Ann Curl; Joaquin M Muriel; Richard M Lovering Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Martin Majewski; Peter E Ochsner; Fanjun Liu; Rudolf Flückiger; Christopher H Evans Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Mario Vetrano; Anna Castorina; Maria Chiara Vulpiani; Rossella Baldini; Antonio Pavan; Andrea Ferretti Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Tara Talaie; Stephen J P Pratt; Camilo Vanegas; Su Xu; R Frank Henn; Paul Yarowsky; Richard M Lovering Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2015-01-22