| Literature DB >> 23724860 |
Julien Prunier1, Betty Pelgas, France Gagnon, Mireille Desponts, Nathalie Isabel, Jean Beaulieu, Jean Bousquet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The genomic architecture of adaptive traits remains poorly understood in non-model plants. Various approaches can be used to bridge this gap, including the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in pedigrees, and genetic association studies in non-structured populations. Here we present results on the genomic architecture of adaptive traits in black spruce, which is a widely distributed conifer of the North American boreal forest. As an alternative to the usual candidate gene approach, a candidate SNP approach was developed for association testing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23724860 PMCID: PMC3674900 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Locations and mean annual temperatures of geographical origins of populations that were used in the genetic association study, and locations of sites for the QTL study (common garden sites #1 and #2) and for the provenance/progeny test used in the genetic association study (common garden sites #3 and #4).
List of the location and characteristics of QTLs found using the three methods in
| 1 | growth | 2007 | IM | site#1 | 60-73 | 3.25 | 6.5 | 3.4 (2.9) | 4.3 (3.8) |
| 1 | growth | 2006 | nIM | site#1 | 60-78 | 3.7 | - | 3.2 (2.8) | 4.4 (3.9) |
| 1 | budset | 2006 | IM | site#1 | 68-73 | 2.87 | 7.9 | 3.3 (2.8) | 4.4 (3.7) |
| 1 | budset | 2007 | IM | site#1 | 81-90 | 3.25 | 6.8 | 3.2 (2.6) | 5.1 (3.9) |
| 1 | budset | 2006 | KW | site#2 | 90.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 1 | budset | 2007 | IM | site#1 | 58-114 | 3.09 | 6.5 | 3.2 (2.8) | 4.8 (3.5) |
| 1 | budset | 2007 | nIM | site#1 | 108-108 | 3.1 | - | 3.2 (2.8) | 4.4 (3.9) |
| 1 | budset | 2007 | K-W | site#1 | 149.00 | ****** | - | - | - |
| 3 | budset | 2007 | K-W | site#2 | 85.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 3 | growth | 2007 | K-W | site#2 | 85.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 4 | budset | 2007 | K-W | site#1 | 76.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 4 | budset | 2007 | K-W | site#1 | 87.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 4 | budset | 2007 | nIM | site#2 | 89-89 | 4.57 | - | 3.2 (2.8) | 4.5 (4.2) |
| 4 | budset | 2007 | nIM | site#1 | 75-118 | 4.1 | - | 3.6 (2.8) | 4.4 (3.9) |
| 4 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site#2 | 88-119 | 3.42 | - | 3.3 (2.7) | 4.7 (4.1) |
| 4 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site#2 | 156.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 4 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site#2 | 160.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 4 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site#2 | 162.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site#1 | 18.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site#1 | 19.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site#1 | 20.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site#1 | 17-22 | 4.2 | - | 3.1 (2.8) | 4.5 (4.1) |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site #1 | 36-42 | 3.2 | - | 3.1 (2.8) | 4.5 (4.1) |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | IM | site #1 | 34-68 | 4.47 | 5.3 | 4.3 (4.0) | 4.5 (3.4) |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | IM | site #1 | 59-65 | 3.17 | 9.7 | 3.4 (2.9) | 4.4 (3.7) |
| 5 | growth | 2006 | IM | site #1 | 111-129 | 3.55 | 7.8 | 3.4 (2.9) | 5.1 (4.0) |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site #2 | 131.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site #1 | 131.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 5 | budset | 2007 | IM | site #1 | 127-134 | 3.43 | 6.1 | 3.6 (3.0) | 4.8 (3.5) |
| 5 | growth | 2006 | IM | site #1 | 131-142 | 3.2 | 7.6 | 3.5 (3.0) | 4.5 (3.8) |
| 5 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site #2 | 142-142 | 2.7 | - | 3.0 (2.7) | 4.7 (4.1) |
| 5 | growth | 2007 | IM | site #1 | 140-147 | 3.43 | 6.6 | 3.3 (2.9) | 4.3 (3.8) |
| 6 | budset | 2006 | IM | site #2 | 0-15 | 2.99 | 11.3 | 3.0 (2.5) | 4.2 (3.7) |
| 6 | budset | 2006 | IM | site #2 | 5-30 | 2.99 | 11.3 | 3.2 (2.7) | 4.3 (3.9) |
| 6 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site #1 | 82-86 | 2.7 | - | 3.0 (2.5) | 4.5 (4.1) |
| 6 | budset | 2007 | nIM | site #2 | 137-147 | 3.7 | - | 2.9 (2.4) | 4.5 (4.2) |
| 6 | budset | 2007 | K-W | site #2 | 169.00 | ***** | - | - | - |
| 6 | budset | 2007 | K-W | site #2 | 170.00 | **** | - | - | - |
| 7 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site #2 | 11-16 | 2.8 | - | 3.0 (2.7) | 4.7 (4.1) |
| 7 | growth | 2006 | IM | site #1 | 82-95 | 2.89 | 7.5 | 3.2 (2.7) | 5.1 (4.0) |
| 7 | growth | 2006 | nIM | site #1 | 99-99 | 2.6 | - | 3.1 (2.6) | 4.4 (3.9) |
| 8 | budset | 2007 | IM | site #2 | 9-15 | 2.99 | 10.8 | 3.1 (2.6) | 4.2 (3.8) |
| 8 | budset | 2007 | IM | site #2 | 18-29 | 3.14 | 11.7 | 3.1 (2.8) | 4.8 (4.1) |
| 9 | growth | 2007 | IM | site #2 | 62-70 | 2.95 | 12.3 | 3.0 (2.7) | 5.3 (4.0) |
| 10 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site #1 | 9.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 10 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site #1 | 20.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 10 | budset | 2007 | nIM | site #1 | 99-104 | 3 | - | 3.3 (2.9) | 4.4 (3.9) |
| 11 | budset | 2007 | IM | site #2 | 0-5 | 2.94 | 9.9 | 2.0 (1.6) | 4.2 (3.8) |
| 11 | budset | 2007 | nIM | site #2 | 7-14 | 2.3 | - | 2.6 (2.1) | 4.5 (4.2) |
| 12 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site #1 | 11-11 | 2.7 | - | 3.1 (2.7) | 4.5 (4.1) |
| 12 | growth | 2007 | nIM | site #1 | 31-33 | 3.8 | - | 3.1 (2.8) | 4.6 (3.9) |
| 12 | growth | 2007 | IM | site #1 | 37-48 | 3.22 | 8.2 | 3.1 (2.7) | 4.3 (4.0) |
| 12 | budset | 2006 | IM | site #2 | 95-106 | 2.98 | 4 | 2.9 (2.5) | 4.3 (3.9) |
| 12 | budset | 2006 | nIM | site #2 | 98-100 | 2.9 | - | 3.2 (2.8) | 4.7 (4.1) |
| 12 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site #2 | 107.00 | *** | - | - | - |
| 12 | budset | 2006 | K-W | site #2 | 109.00 | **** | - | - | - |
a Linkage group according to Pavy et al. 2008.
b Methods of QTL detection: nIM, non-parametric interval mapping; IM, interval mapping; K-W, Kruskal-Wallis test (see material and methods).
c According to Figure 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1.
d Position in cM according to Kosambi function.
e p-value for the Kruskal-Wallis tests: *** > 0.995; **** > 0.999; ***** > 0.9995; ****** > 0.9999.
f PVE: proportion of variance explained.
Figure 2Example of QTL mapping results for budset timing using non-parametric interval mapping at year 7 for both study sites (#1 and #2). The complete QTL mapping results are tabulated in Table 1.
List and description of gene SNPs significantly associated with adaptive trait variation in
| AUX/IAA | 1 | 4 | budset | 7 | 0.01 | 1.40 | 0.06 | TWM | ||
| Unknown | 1 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.08 | - | ||
| C2H2 zinc finger | 1 | 3 | height | 12 | 0.02 | 2.23 | 0.10 | PWM* | ||
| BAM1 | 3 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.08 | PWM***, AAP* | ||
| C3HC4 Ring finger | 3 | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.02 | 1.95 | 0.08 | MAT*, TWM*** | ||
| NAC | 3 | 4 | height | 7 | 0.07 | 0.74 | 0.10 | MAT*, TWM*, TCM* | ||
| Zinc ion binding | 4 | 4 | budset | 7 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 0.03 | - | ||
| C3HC4 Ring finger | 4 | 4 | height | 6 | 0.06 | 1.29 | 0.06 | - | ||
| | | | | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.10 | |
| | | | | 3 | height | 12 | 0.01 | 2.36 | 0.1 | |
| Beta-glucosidase | 4 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.01 | 0.48 | 0.05 | - | ||
| AP2 | 5 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.08 | TWM*, DGD* | ||
| AP2 | 5 | 4 | height | 7 | 0.08 | 0.73 | 0.10 | - | ||
| LEA | 5 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.10 | TCM*, TWM** | ||
| RAP2 | 5 | 4 | height | 6 | 0.01 | 2.01 | 0.03 | MAT***, TWM***, TCM* | ||
| | | | | 4 | height | 7 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 0.03 | |
| AP2 | 5 | 4 | budset | 7 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 0.01 | - | ||
| | | | | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.03 | 1.70 | 0.08 | |
| | | | | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.05 | |
| U-box superfamily | 5 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.08 | - | ||
| | | | | 3 | height | 12 | 0.03 | 2.16 | 0.10 | |
| transcription factor | 5 | 4 | height | 6 | 0.02 | 1.70 | 0.03 | TWM | ||
| | | | | 4 | height | 7 | 0.03 | 1.67 | 0.04 | |
| | | | | 3 | height | 12 | 0.01 | 2.40 | 0.10 | |
| C2H2 zinc finger | 6 | 4 | height | 6 | 0.02 | 1.85 | 0.03 | - | ||
| | | | | 4 | height | 7 | 0.02 | 1.72 | 0.04 | |
| MYB (10) | 7 | 4 | height | 6 | 0.03 | 1.69 | 0.03 | MAT*, TCM* | ||
| | | | | 4 | height | 7 | 0.05 | 1.41 | 0.05 | |
| PLATZ | 7 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.06 | 0.65 | 0.08 | TCM* | ||
| GASA | 7 | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.05 | 1.42 | 0.08 | - | ||
| MYB (5) | 7 | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.09 | 1.16 | 0.10 | TWM*, DGD* | ||
| | | | | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.08 | |
| Scarecrow-like | 7 | 4 | height | 7 | 0.06 | 0.83 | 0.07 | - | ||
| | | | | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.08 | |
| | | | | 4 | height | 6 | 0.10 | 1.07 | 0.09 | |
| Homeobox | 7 | 4 | height | 6 | 0.02 | 1.86 | 0.03 | MAT*, TWM*, TCM* | ||
| | | | | 4 | height | 7 | 0.03 | 1.67 | 0.04 | |
| | | | | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.08 | 0.34 | 0.10 | |
| NAM | 8 | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.10 | - | ||
| B-box zinc family | 9 | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.04 | 1.50 | 0.08 | TCM*, MAT** | ||
| | | | | 4 | height | 6 | 0.04 | 1.47 | 0.05 | |
| | | | | 3 | budset | 7 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.08 | |
| Chaperone DnaJ Heat | 9 | 3 | height | 6 | 0.01 | 1.29 | 0.06 | DGD*, TWM*, PWM* | ||
| | | Shock Prot. | | 3 | height | 7 | 0.02 | 1.12 | 0.03 | |
| | | | | 3 | height | 12 | 0.04 | 0.99 | 0.01 | |
| PATATIN | 9 | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.08 | 1.21 | 0.10 | TCM* | ||
| | | | | 4 | height | 7 | 0.10 | 0.63 | 0.10 | |
| MYB (11) | 9 | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.03 | 1.65 | 0.08 | MAT***, TCM*, TWM*** | ||
| HLH | 10 | 4 | budset | 8 | 0.06 | 1.38 | 0.08 | - | ||
| HTH | 11 | 4 | height | 7 | 0.06 | 0.84 | 0.10 | - | ||
| WRKY | 12 | 4 | height | 7 | 0.05 | 0.90 | 0.07 | - | ||
| MYB domain | 12 | 3 | height | 6 | 0.01 | 0.85 | 0.06 | - | ||
| MYB | 12 | 4 | budset | 7 | 0.03 | 1.71 | 0.08 | - | ||
| 4 | budset | 8 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 0.03 |
a Gene ID follows the nomenclature of the white spruce gene catalogue GCAT [39].
b LG: Linkage group following the nomenclature of [31].
c Site numbers as indicated on Figure 1.
d PVE: Proportion of variance explained.
e Climatic factors significantly correlated with the allele frequency variation of significant gene SNPs: PWM: precipitation of the wettest month; AAP: annual amount of precipitation; TWM: temperature of the warmest month; DGD: annual number of degree-days above 5°C; TCM: temperature of the coldest month; MAT: mean annual temperature. *: P ≤ 0.05; **: P ≤ 0.01; ***:P ≤ 0.005.
Figure 3Examples of linear regressions between the allele frequency of SNPs significantly associated with trait variation and climatic variables of population origins. MAT, mean annual temperature; TWM, mean temperature of the warmest month; PWT, total amount of precipitation of the wettest month; TCM, mean temperature of the coldest month.