Craig H Carlson1, Fred E Gouker1, Chase R Crowell2, Luke Evans3, Stephen P DiFazio4, Christine D Smart2, Lawrence B Smart1. 1. Horticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Cornell AgriTech, Geneva, NY, USA. 2. Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Cornell AgriTech, Geneva, NY, USA. 3. Institute for Behavioral Genetics and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. 4. Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increasing energy demands and the necessity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are key motivating factors driving the development of lignocellulosic crops as an alternative to non-renewable energy sources. The effects of global climate change will require a better understanding of the genetic basis of complex adaptive traits to breed more resilient bioenergy feedstocks, like willow (Salix spp.). Shrub willow is a sustainable and dedicated bioenergy crop, bred to be fast-growing and high-yielding on marginal land without competing with food crops. In a rapidly changing climate, genomic advances will be vital for the sustained improvement of willow and other non-model bioenergy crops. Here, joint genetic mapping was used to exploit genetic variation garnered from both recent and historical recombination events in S. purpurea. METHODS: A panel of North American naturalized S. purpurea accessions and full-sib F2S. purpurea population were genotyped and phenotyped for a suite of morphological, physiological, pest and disease resistance, and wood chemical composition traits, collected from multi-environment and multi-year replicated field trials. Controlling for population stratification and kinship in the association panel and spatial variation in the F2, a comprehensive mixed model analysis was used to dissect the complex genetic architecture and plasticity of these important traits. KEY RESULTS: Individually, genome-wide association (GWAS) models differed in terms of power, but the combined approach, which corrects for yearly and environmental co-factors across datasets, improved the overall detection and resolution of associated loci. Although there were few significant GWAS hits located within support intervals of QTL for corresponding traits in the F2, many large-effect QTL were identified, as well as QTL hotspots. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first comparison of linkage analysis and linkage disequilibrium mapping approaches in Salix, and highlights the complementarity and limits of these two methods for elucidating the genetic architecture of complex bioenergy-related traits of a woody perennial breeding programme.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increasing energy demands and the necessity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are key motivating factors driving the development of lignocellulosic crops as an alternative to non-renewable energy sources. The effects of global climate change will require a better understanding of the genetic basis of complex adaptive traits to breed more resilient bioenergy feedstocks, like willow (Salix spp.). Shrub willow is a sustainable and dedicated bioenergy crop, bred to be fast-growing and high-yielding on marginal land without competing with food crops. In a rapidly changing climate, genomic advances will be vital for the sustained improvement of willow and other non-model bioenergy crops. Here, joint genetic mapping was used to exploit genetic variation garnered from both recent and historical recombination events in S. purpurea. METHODS: A panel of North American naturalized S. purpurea accessions and full-sib F2S. purpurea population were genotyped and phenotyped for a suite of morphological, physiological, pest and disease resistance, and wood chemical composition traits, collected from multi-environment and multi-year replicated field trials. Controlling for population stratification and kinship in the association panel and spatial variation in the F2, a comprehensive mixed model analysis was used to dissect the complex genetic architecture and plasticity of these important traits. KEY RESULTS: Individually, genome-wide association (GWAS) models differed in terms of power, but the combined approach, which corrects for yearly and environmental co-factors across datasets, improved the overall detection and resolution of associated loci. Although there were few significant GWAS hits located within support intervals of QTL for corresponding traits in the F2, many large-effect QTL were identified, as well as QTL hotspots. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first comparison of linkage analysis and linkage disequilibrium mapping approaches in Salix, and highlights the complementarity and limits of these two methods for elucidating the genetic architecture of complex bioenergy-related traits of a woody perennial breeding programme.
Authors: Gang Wu; Wan-Ching Lin; Tengbo Huang; R Scott Poethig; Patricia S Springer; Randall A Kerstetter Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G Taylor; I S Donnison; D Murphy-Bokern; M Morgante; M-B Bogeat-Triboulot; R Bhalerao; M Hertzberg; A Polle; A Harfouche; F Alasia; V Petoussi; D Trebbi; K Schwarz; J J B Keurentjes; M Centritto; B Genty; J Flexas; E Grill; S Salvi; W J Davies Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Ran Zhou; David Macaya-Sanz; Craig H Carlson; Jeremy Schmutz; Jerry W Jenkins; David Kudrna; Aditi Sharma; Laura Sandor; Shengqiang Shu; Kerrie Barry; Gerald A Tuskan; Tao Ma; Jianquan Liu; Matthew Olson; Lawrence B Smart; Stephen P DiFazio Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Luka A O Awata; Yoseph Beyene; Manje Gowda; Suresh L M; McDonald B Jumbo; Pangirayi Tongoona; Eric Danquah; Beatrice E Ifie; Philip W Marchelo-Dragga; Michael Olsen; Veronica Ogugo; Stephen Mugo; Boddupalli M Prasanna Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Brennan Hyden; Craig H Carlson; Fred E Gouker; Jeremy Schmutz; Kerrie Barry; Anna Lipzen; Aditi Sharma; Laura Sandor; Gerald A Tuskan; Guanqiao Feng; Matthew S Olson; Stephen P DiFazio; Lawrence B Smart Journal: Hortic Res Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 6.793
Authors: Dustin G Wilkerson; Chase R Crowell; Craig H Carlson; Patrick W McMullen; Christine D Smart; Lawrence B Smart Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Craig H Carlson; Yongwook Choi; Agnes P Chan; Christopher D Town; Lawrence B Smart Journal: G3 (Bethesda) Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.542