| Literature DB >> 23722635 |
Abstract
Minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often estimated by selecting a clinical variable to serve as an anchor. Then, differences in the clinical anchor regarded as clinically meaningful or important can be used to estimate the corresponding value of the PRO. Although these MID values are sometimes estimated by regression techniques, we show that this is a biased procedure and should not be used; alternative methods are proposed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23722635 PMCID: PMC3961825 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0443-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Qual Life Res ISSN: 0962-9343 Impact factor: 4.147