Literature DB >> 19255158

Responsiveness of NEI VFQ-25 to changes in visual acuity in neovascular AMD: validation studies from two phase 3 clinical trials.

Ivan J Suñer1, Gregg T Kokame, Elaine Yu, James Ward, Chantal Dolan, Neil M Bressler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) by using data from the MARINA and ANCHOR trials in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to establish the change in the NEI VFQ-25 associated with a 15-letter change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
METHODS: In MARINA, 716 patients were randomized to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 or 0.5 mg) or sham injections. In ANCHOR, 423 patients were randomized to monthly ranibizumab (0.3 or 0.5 mg) with sham photodynamic therapy (PDT) or sham ocular injections with verteporfin PDT. Patients had follow-up interviews and BCVA measurements over 24 months. Data were analyzed separately for MARINA and ANCHOR, and treatment groups were pooled within each trial. The clinically relevant difference in NEI VFQ-25 was estimated based on regression models of change from baseline to month 12 in BCVA.
RESULTS: Subgroups categorized by BCVA change (>or=15 letters gained, <15 letters lost or gained, or >or=15 letters lost) differed substantially in mean change in NEI VFQ-25 composite scores and three pre-specified subscale scores (near activities, distance activities, and vision-specific dependency) over 12 months. According to the regression models, the difference associated with a 15-letter change was 4 to 6 points for the composite score and the three pre-specified subscales.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of the NEI VFQ-25 as a responsive and sensitive measure of vision-related function in neovascular AMD populations. Based on MARINA and ANCHOR data, a 4- to 6-point change in NEI VFQ-25 scores represents a clinically meaningful change corresponding to a 15-letter change in BCVA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255158     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  69 in total

1.  Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases.

Authors:  Ian J Saldanha; Kristina Lindsley; Diana V Do; Roy S Chuck; Catherine Meyerle; Leslie S Jones; Anne L Coleman; Henry D Jampel; Kay Dickersin; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Associations among visual acuity and vision- and health-related quality of life among patients in the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Lea T Drye; John H Kempen; James P Dunn; Gary N Holland; Paul Latkany; Narsing A Rao; H Nida Sen; Elizabeth A Sugar; Jennifer E Thorne; Robert C Wang; Janet T Holbrook
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in medical product development: a report from the 2009 NEI/FDA Clinical Trial Endpoints Symposium.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Elaine A Richman; Frederick L Ferris; Neil M Bressler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rajeev H Muni; Carolina L M Francisconi; Tina Felfeli; Michael Y K Mak; Alan R Berger; David T Wong; Filiberto Altomare; Louis R Giavedoni; Radha P Kohly; Peter J Kertes; Natalia Figueiredo; Fei Zuo; Kevin E Thorpe; Roxane J Hillier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the National Eye Institute Visual-Function Questionnaire-25 for utility estimation.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kowalski; Anne M Rentz; John G Walt; Andrew Lloyd; Jeff Lee; Tracey A Young; Wen-Hung Chen; Neil M Bressler; Paul Lee; John E Brazier; Ron D Hays; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Effect of acetazolamide on visual function in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and mild visual loss: the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial.

Authors:  Michael Wall; Michael P McDermott; Karl D Kieburtz; James J Corbett; Steven E Feldon; Deborah I Friedman; David M Katz; John L Keltner; Eleanor B Schron; Mark J Kupersmith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Apr 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  David S Boyer; J Jill Hopkins; Jonathan Sorof; Jason S Ehrlich
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.565

8.  Vision-related quality of life: 12-month aflibercept treatment in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Meidong Zhu; Wijeyanthy Wijeyakumar; Adil R Syed; Nichole Joachim; Thomas Hong; Geoffrey K Broadhead; Haitao Li; Kehui Luo; Andrew Chang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Patient-Centered Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Wesley T Beaulieu; Neil M Bressler; Michele Melia; Cynthia Owsley; Calvin E Mein; Jeffrey G Gross; Lee M Jampol; Adam R Glassman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  A low-vision rehabilitation program for patients with mild cognitive deficits.

Authors:  Heather E Whitson; Diane Whitaker; Guy Potter; Eleanor McConnell; Fay Tripp; Linda L Sanders; Kelly W Muir; Harvey J Cohen; Scott W Cousins
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.