Literature DB >> 28941213

Adaptive behavior in autism: Minimal clinically important differences on the Vineland-II.

C H Chatham1, K I Taylor1, T Charman2, X Liogier D'ardhuy1, E Eule1, A Fedele3, A Y Hardan4, E Loth2, L Murtagh1, M Del Valle Rubido1, A San Jose Caceres2, J Sevigny1, L Sikich5, L Snyder6, J E Tillmann2, P E Ventola7, K L Walton-Bowen6, P P Wang6, T Willgoss1, F Bolognani1.   

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is associated with persistent impairments in adaptive abilities across multiple domains. These social, personal, and communicative impairments become increasingly pronounced with development, and are present regardless of IQ. The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) is the most commonly used instrument for quantifying these impairments, but minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) on Vineland-II scores have not been rigorously established in ASD. We pooled data from several consortia/registries (EU-AIMS LEAP study, ABIDE-I, ABIDE-II, INFOR, Simons Simplex Collection and Autism Treatment Network [ATN]) and clinical investigations and trials (Stanford, Yale, Roche) resulting in a data set of over 9,000 individuals with ASD. Two approaches were used to estimate MCIDs: distribution-based methods and anchor-based methods. Distribution-based MCID [d-MCID] estimates included the standard error of the measurement, as well as one-fifth and one-half of the covariate-adjusted standard deviation (both cross-sectionally and longitudinally). Anchor-based MCID [a-MCID] estimates include the slope of linear regression of clinician ratings of severity on the Vineland-II score, the slope of linear regression of clinician ratings of longitudinal improvement category on Vineland-II change, the Vineland-II change score maximally differentiating clinical impressions of minimal versus no improvement, and equipercentile equating. Across strata, the Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Composite standardized score MCID estimates range from 2.01 to 3.2 for distribution-based methods, and from 2.42 to 3.75 for sample-size-weighted anchor-based methods. Lower Vineland-II standardized score MCID estimates were observed for younger and more cognitively impaired populations. These MCID estimates enable users of Vineland-II to assess both the statistical and clinical significance of any observed change. Autism Res 2018, 11: 270-283.
© 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd edition; Vineland-II) is the most widely used scale for assessing day-to-day "adaptive" skills. Yet, it is unknown how much Vineland-II scores must change for those changes to be regarded as clinically significant. We pooled data from over 9,000 individuals with ASD to show that changes of 2-3.75 points on the Vineland-II Composite score represent the "minimal clinically-important difference." These estimates will help evaluate the benefits of potential new treatments for ASD. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VABS; assessment; autism spectrum disorder; efficacy; intellectual disability; intelligence; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28941213      PMCID: PMC5997920          DOI: 10.1002/aur.1874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autism Res        ISSN: 1939-3806            Impact factor:   5.216


  53 in total

1.  Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kathleen W Wyrwich; William M Tierney; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  IQ in children with autism spectrum disorders: data from the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP).

Authors:  T Charman; A Pickles; E Simonoff; S Chandler; T Loucas; G Baird
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral characteristics of Williams syndrome.

Authors:  M K Greer; F R Brown; G S Pai; S H Choudry; A J Klein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-09-19

Review 4.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Steven D Glassman; David W Polly; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Longitudinal study of cognitive abilities and adaptive behavior levels in fragile X males: a prospective multicenter analysis.

Authors:  G S Fisch; R Simensen; J Tarleton; M Chalifoux; J J Holden; N Carpenter; P N Howard-Peebles; A Maddalena
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1996-08-09

6.  Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Helen McConachie; Jeremy R Parr; Magdalena Glod; Jennifer Hanratty; Nuala Livingstone; Inalegwu P Oono; Shannon Robalino; Gillian Baird; Bryony Beresford; Tony Charman; Deborah Garland; Jonathan Green; Paul Gringras; Glenys Jones; James Law; Ann S Le Couteur; Geraldine Macdonald; Elaine M McColl; Christopher Morris; Jacqueline Rodgers; Emily Simonoff; Caroline B Terwee; Katrina Williams
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Developmental trajectories of symptom severity and adaptive functioning in an inception cohort of preschool children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Peter Szatmari; Stelios Georgiades; Eric Duku; Teresa A Bennett; Susan Bryson; Eric Fombonne; Pat Mirenda; Wendy Roberts; Isabel M Smith; Tracy Vaillancourt; Joanne Volden; Charlotte Waddell; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Mayada Elsabbagh; Ann Thompson
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 8.  Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; David Osoba; Albert W Wu; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Ascertainment and gender in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Yamini J Howe; Yvette Yatchmink; Emma W Viscidi; Eric M Morrow
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 10.  Beyond Lumping and Splitting: A Review of Computational Approaches for Stratifying Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Andre F Marquand; Thomas Wolfers; Maarten Mennes; Jan Buitelaar; Christian F Beckmann
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-09
View more
  30 in total

1.  The Need for a Developmentally Based Measure of Social Communication Skills.

Authors:  Somer Bishop; Cristan Farmer; Aaron Kaat; Stelios Georgiades; Stephen Kanne; Audrey Thurm
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 2.  The UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project (BCP): An overview of the study design and protocol development.

Authors:  Brittany R Howell; Martin A Styner; Wei Gao; Pew-Thian Yap; Li Wang; Kristine Baluyot; Essa Yacoub; Geng Chen; Taylor Potts; Andrew Salzwedel; Gang Li; John H Gilmore; Joseph Piven; J Keith Smith; Dinggang Shen; Kamil Ugurbil; Hongtu Zhu; Weili Lin; Jed T Elison
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Safety and target engagement of an oral small-molecule sequestrant in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: an open-label phase 1b/2a trial.

Authors:  A Stewart Campbell; Brittany D Needham; Christopher R Meyer; Joanna Tan; Mary Conrad; Gregory M Preston; Federico Bolognani; Srinivas G Rao; Helen Heussler; Rebecca Griffith; Adam J Guastella; Amy C Janes; Blaise Frederick; David H Donabedian; Sarkis K Mazmanian
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  The Autism Impact Measure (AIM): Meaningful Change Thresholds and Core Symptom Changes Over One Year from an Online Survey in the U.S.

Authors:  Mariabeth Silkey; Gonzalo Durán-Pacheco; Michelle Johnson; Chuang Liu; Susanne Clinch; Kiely Law; Georg Loss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-07-04

5.  Correlation between 2D and 3D Fetal Brain MRI Biometry and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Fetuses with Suspected Microcephaly and Macrocephaly.

Authors:  S Fried; M Gafner; D Jeddah; N Gosher; D Hoffman; R Ber; A Mayer; E Katorza
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.966

6.  Concordance of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, second and third editions.

Authors:  C Farmer; D Adedipe; V H Bal; C Chlebowski; A Thurm
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2019-10-28

7.  A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Daily Living Skills Intervention for Adolescents with Autism.

Authors:  Amie Duncan; Jareen Meinzen-Derr; Lisa A Ruble; Carrie Fassler; Lori J Stark
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-04-09

8.  Patient Outcomes After Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Kristen R Choi; Bhumi Bhakta; Elizabeth A Knight; Tracy A Becerra-Culqui; Teri L Gahre; Bonnie Zima; Karen J Coleman
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.225

9.  Influence of Ideational Praxis on the Development of Play and Adaptive Behavior of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Serrada-Tejeda; Sergio Santos-Del-Riego; Teresa A May-Benson; Marta Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Functioning assessment short test (FAST): validity and reliability in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Laura Gisbert-Gustemps; Jorge Lugo-Marín; Imanol Setien Ramos; Gemma Español Martín; Eduard Vieta; C Mar Bonnín; Josep Antoni Ramos Quiroga
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.