Literature DB >> 23719962

Discrete element analysis for characterizing the patellofemoral pressure distribution: model evaluation.

John J Elias1, Archana Saranathan.   

Abstract

The current study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of computational assessment of the influence of the orientation of the patellar tendon on the patellofemoral pressure distribution. Computational models were created to represent eight knees previously tested at 40 deg, 60 deg, and 80 deg of flexion to evaluate the influence of hamstrings loading on the patellofemoral pressure distribution. Hamstrings loading increased the lateral and posterior orientation of the patellar tendon, with the change for each test determined from experimentally measured variations in tibiofemoral alignment. The patellar tendon and the cartilage on the femur and patella were represented with springs. After loading the quadriceps, the total potential energy was minimized to determine the force within the patellar tendon. The forces applied by the quadriceps and patellar tendon produced patellar translation and rotation. The deformation of each cartilage spring was determined from overlap of the cartilage surfaces on the femur and patella and related to force using linear elastic theory. The patella was iteratively adjusted until the extension moment, tilt moment, compression, and lateral force acting on the patella were in equilibrium. For the maximum pressure applied to lateral cartilage and the ratio of the lateral compression to the total compression, paired t-tests were performed at each flexion angle to determine if the output varied significantly (p < 0.05) between the two loading conditions. For both the computational and experimental data, loading the hamstrings significantly increased the lateral force ratio and the maximum lateral pressure at multiple flexion angles. For the computational data, loading the hamstrings increased the average lateral force ratio and maximum lateral pressure by approximately 0.04 and 0.3 MPa, respectively, compared to experimental increases of 0.06 and 0.4 MPa, respectively. The computational modeling technique accurately characterized variations in the patellofemoral pressure distribution caused by altering the orientation of the patellar tendon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23719962      PMCID: PMC3697016          DOI: 10.1115/1.4024287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  31 in total

1.  A Mathematical Formulation for 3D Quasi-Static Multibody Models of Diarthrodial Joints.

Authors:  S. D. Kwak; L. Blankevoort; G. A. Ateshian
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Effect of tibial tubercle elevation on biomechanics of the entire knee joint under muscle loads.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; W Mesfar
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend.

Authors:  Mark A Baldwin; Chadd Clary; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Displacements of the tibial tuberosity. Effects of the surgical parameters.

Authors:  J F Benvenuti; L Rakotomanana; P F Leyvraz; D P Pioletti; J H Heegaard; M G Genton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Value of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patellar instability in the young athlete.

Authors:  Peter Balcarek; Klaus Jung; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Klaus Michael Stürmer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  The effect of tibial tuberosity realignment procedures on the patellofemoral pressure distribution.

Authors:  Archana Saranathan; Marcus S Kirkpatrick; Saandeep Mani; Laura G Smith; Andrew J Cosgarea; Juay Seng Tan; John J Elias
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A modeling framework to estimate patellofemoral joint cartilage stress in vivo.

Authors:  Thor F Besier; Garry E Gold; Gary S Beaupré; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 9.  Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  John P Fulkerson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Computational assessment of the influence of vastus medialis obliquus function on patellofemoral pressures: model evaluation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Srianjana Kilambi; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  12 in total

1.  Dynamic simulation of tibial tuberosity realignment: model evaluation.

Authors:  Tserenchimed Purevsuren; John J Elias; Kyungsoo Kim; Yoon Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Variations in kinematics and function following patellar stabilization including tibial tuberosity realignment.

Authors:  John J Elias; John A Carrino; Archana Saranathan; Loredana M Guseila; Miho J Tanaka; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Allowing one quadrant of patellar lateral translation during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction successfully limits maltracking without overconstraining the patella.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; Molly K Lalonde; Joseph N Gabra; S Cyrus Rezvanifar; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Computational simulation of medial versus anteromedial tibial tuberosity transfer for patellar instability.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; Andrew J Copa; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Tuberosity Medialization and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  John J Elias; Bradley W Smith; Blake T Daney
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Does Patella Tendon Tenodesis Improve Tibial Tubercle Distalization in Treating Patella Alta? A Computational Study.

Authors:  Li Yin; Tzu-Chieh Liao; Liu Yang; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Tibial tuberosity anteriomedialization vs. medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for treatment of patellar instability related to malalignment: Computational simulation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Miho J Tanaka; Kerwyn C Jones; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Finite element analysis to characterize how varying patellar loading influences pressure applied to cartilage: model evaluation.

Authors:  Kushal S Shah; Archana Saranathan; Bharath Koya; John J Elias
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  Biphasic Analysis of Cartilage Stresses in the Patellofemoral Joint.

Authors:  Brian Jones; Clark T Hung; Gerard Ateshian
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.