Literature DB >> 30024053

Computational simulation of medial versus anteromedial tibial tuberosity transfer for patellar instability.

John J Elias1, Kerwyn C Jones2, Andrew J Copa1, Andrew J Cosgarea3.   

Abstract

The study utilizes dynamic simulation of knee function to determine how tibial tuberosity medialization and anteromedialization influence patellar tracking and contact pressures for knees with patellar instability. Dual limb squatting was simulated with six multibody dynamic simulation models representing knees being treated for patellar instability. Each knee exhibited lateral patellar maltracking in the pre-operative condition based on the bisect offset index. The patellar tendon attachment points on the tibia were medialized by 10 mm to represent tibial tuberosity medialization, with an additional 5 mm of anteriorization applied for anteromedialization. The patellofemoral contact pressure distribution was quantified using discrete element analysis. Data were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance with post-hoc tests and linear regressions. Tibial tuberosity medialization and anteromedialization significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the bisect offset index for nearly all flexion angles up to 80°, with the largest changes near full extension. Both procedures significantly decreased the maximum lateral pressure at 55°, but increased the maximum medial pressure from 30 to 80°. The pre-operative to post-operative increase in the maximum contact pressure was significantly correlated with the maximum pre-operative bisect offset index for tuberosity medialization (r2  = 0.84), but not for anteromedialization. Statement of Clinical Significance: The results indicate tibial tuberosity medialization decreases patellar lateral maltracking and lateral patellofemoral contact pressures, but increases medial contact pressures. When pre-operative patellar maltracking is relatively low, tibial tuberosity medialization is likely to increase maximum contact pressures. Tibial tuberosity anteromedialization lowers the risk of elevated post-operative contact pressures compared to medialization.
© 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:3231-3238, 2018. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage pressure; patellar instability; patellar tracking; tibial tuberosity anteromedialization; tibial tuberosity medialization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30024053      PMCID: PMC6320314          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  43 in total

1.  Trochlear contact pressures after anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle.

Authors:  Paul R Beck; Andre L Thomas; Jack Farr; Paul B Lewis; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee.

Authors:  L Blankevoort; J H Kuiper; R Huiskes; H J Grootenboer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Displacements of the tibial tuberosity. Effects of the surgical parameters.

Authors:  J F Benvenuti; L Rakotomanana; P F Leyvraz; D P Pioletti; J H Heegaard; M G Genton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Rahul Biyani; John J Elias; Archana Saranathan; Hao Feng; Loredana M Guseila; Melanie A Morscher; Kerwyn C Jones
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The effect of tibial tuberosity realignment procedures on the patellofemoral pressure distribution.

Authors:  Archana Saranathan; Marcus S Kirkpatrick; Saandeep Mani; Laura G Smith; Andrew J Cosgarea; Juay Seng Tan; John J Elias
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  In vivo load sharing among the quadriceps components.

Authors:  Li-Qun Zhang; Guangzhi Wang; Gordon W Nuber; Joel M Press; Jason L Koh
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Variations in Tibial Tuberosity to Trochlear Groove and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distances due to Tibial External and Valgus Rotations.

Authors:  Bradley W Smith; Emily A Millar; Kerwyn C Jones; John J Elias
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Cartilage lesions of the patella in recurrent patellar dislocation.

Authors:  Eiki Nomura; M Inoue
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  An Algorithmic Approach to the Management of Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation.

Authors:  Alexander E Weber; Amit Nathani; Joshua S Dines; Answorth A Allen; Beth E Shubin-Stein; Elizabeth A Arendt; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Patellar Instability Management: A Survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group.

Authors:  Joseph N Liu; Michael E Steinhaus; Irene L Kalbian; William R Post; Daniel W Green; Sabrina M Strickland; Beth E Shubin Stein
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

1.  Combined MPFL reconstruction and tibial tuberosity transfer avoid focal patella overload in the setting of elevated TT-TG distances.

Authors:  Alessandra Berton; Giuseppe Salvatore; Ara Nazarian; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Alexander Orsi; Jonathan Egan; Arun Ramappa; Joseph DeAngelis; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.114

2.  Tibial tuberosity anteriomedialization vs. medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for treatment of patellar instability related to malalignment: Computational simulation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Miho J Tanaka; Kerwyn C Jones; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Factors Influencing Graft Function following MPFL Reconstruction: A Dynamic Simulation Study.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; Andrew J Cosgarea; Jared M Forman; John J Elias
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.