Literature DB >> 25025488

Dynamic simulation of tibial tuberosity realignment: model evaluation.

Tserenchimed Purevsuren1, John J Elias, Kyungsoo Kim, Yoon Hyuk Kim.   

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate a dynamic multibody model developed to characterize the influence of tibial tuberosity realignment procedures on patellofemoral motion and loading. Computational models were created to represent four knees previously tested at 40°, 60°, and 80° of flexion with the tibial tuberosity in a lateral, medial and anteromedial positions. The experimentally loaded muscles, major ligaments of the knee, and patellar tendon were represented. A repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc testing was performed at each flexion angle to compare data between the three positions of the tibial tuberosity. Significant experimental trends for decreased patella flexion due to tuberosity anteriorization and a decrease in the lateral contact force due to tuberosity medialization were reproduced computationally. The dynamic multibody modeling technique will allow simulation of function for symptomatic knees to identify optimal surgical treatment methods based on parameters related to knee pathology and pre-operative kinematics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; dynamic model; kinematics; knee; patellofemoral joint; tuberosity realignment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25025488      PMCID: PMC4286491          DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2014.936857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  28 in total

1.  A Mathematical Formulation for 3D Quasi-Static Multibody Models of Diarthrodial Joints.

Authors:  S. D. Kwak; L. Blankevoort; G. A. Ateshian
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Effect of tibial tubercle elevation on biomechanics of the entire knee joint under muscle loads.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; W Mesfar
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend.

Authors:  Mark A Baldwin; Chadd Clary; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Displacements of the tibial tuberosity. Effects of the surgical parameters.

Authors:  J F Benvenuti; L Rakotomanana; P F Leyvraz; D P Pioletti; J H Heegaard; M G Genton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  The effect of tibial tuberosity realignment procedures on the patellofemoral pressure distribution.

Authors:  Archana Saranathan; Marcus S Kirkpatrick; Saandeep Mani; Laura G Smith; Andrew J Cosgarea; Juay Seng Tan; John J Elias
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Validation of a three-dimensional model of the knee.

Authors:  L Blankevoort; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Patellar instability.

Authors:  Alexis Chiang Colvin; Robin V West
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Computational assessment of the influence of vastus medialis obliquus function on patellofemoral pressures: model evaluation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Srianjana Kilambi; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Influence of bundle diameter and attachment point on kinematic behavior in double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using computational model.

Authors:  Oh Soo Kwon; Tserenchimed Purevsuren; Kyungsoo Kim; Won Man Park; Tae-Kyu Kwon; Yoon Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 2.238

View more
  7 in total

1.  Allowing one quadrant of patellar lateral translation during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction successfully limits maltracking without overconstraining the patella.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; Molly K Lalonde; Joseph N Gabra; S Cyrus Rezvanifar; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Computational simulation of medial versus anteromedial tibial tuberosity transfer for patellar instability.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; Andrew J Copa; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Tuberosity Medialization and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  John J Elias; Bradley W Smith; Blake T Daney
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Dynamic tracking influenced by anatomy following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: Computational simulation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; S Cyrus Rezvanifar; Joseph N Gabra; Melanie A Morscher; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Lateral patellar maltracking due to trochlear dysplasia: A computational study.

Authors:  S Cyrus Rezvanifar; Brett L Flesher; Kerwyn C Jones; John J Elias
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Dynamic Simulation of the Effects of Graft Fixation Errors During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  John J Elias; Michael J Kelly; Kathryn E Smith; Kenneth A Gall; Jack Farr
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-09-20

7.  Towards a Dynamic Model of the Kangaroo Knee for Clinical Insights into Human Knee Pathology and Treatment: Establishing a Static Biomechanical Profile.

Authors:  Manaal Fatima; Corey J Scholes; Emily Zhong; Lawrence Kohan
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.