Literature DB >> 25140407

Patient Navigation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Cam Escoffery1, Maria E Fernandez, Sally W Vernon, Shuting Liang, Annette E Maxwell, Jennifer D Allen, Andrea Dwyer, Peggy A Hannon, Marlana Kohn, Amy DeGroff.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among cancers affecting both men and women in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) supports both direct clinical screening services (screening provision) and activities to promote screening at the population level (screening promotion).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize patient navigation (PN) programs for screening provision and promotion for the first 1 to 2 years of program funding. PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of the 29 CRCCP grantees (25 states and 4 tribal organizations) and 14 in-depth interviews to assess program implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey and interview guide collected information on CRC screening provision and promotion activities and PN, including the structure of the PN program, characteristics of the navigators, funding mechanism, and navigators' activities.
RESULTS: Twenty-four of 28 CRCCP grantees of the survey used PN for screening provision whereas 18 grantees used navigation for screening promotion. Navigators were often trained in nursing or public health. Navigation activities were similar for both screening provision and promotion, and common tasks included assessing and responding to patient barriers to screening, providing patient education, and scheduling appointments. For screening provision, activities centered on making reminder calls, educating patients on bowel preparation for colonoscopies, and tracking patients for completion of the tests. Navigation may influence screening quality by improving patients' bowel preparation for colonoscopies.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insights into PN across a federally funded CRC program. Results suggest that PN activities may be instrumental in recruiting people into cancer screening and ensuring completed screening and follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25140407      PMCID: PMC4618371          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  30 in total

1.  The Colorectal Cancer Control Program: partnering to increase population level screening.

Authors:  Djenaba A Joseph; Amy S DeGroff; Nikki S Hayes; Faye L Wong; Marcus Plescia
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Resa M Jones; Steven H Woolf; Tina D Cunningham; Robert E Johnson; Alex H Krist; Stephen F Rothemich; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; J Phil Harrop; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Sandra Lisboa; A Naomie Casimir; Lisa Valley-Shah; Karen M Emmons; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

Review 5.  Assessing the impact of patient navigation: prevention and early detection metrics.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; Linda Burhansstipanov; Samantha S Murrell; Andrea J Dwyer; Sarah E Caron
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Metrics for evaluating patient navigation during cancer diagnosis and treatment: crafting a policy-relevant research agenda for patient navigation in cancer care.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel Dohan; Peter Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  History and principles of patient navigation.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman; Rian L Rodriguez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators in older persons.

Authors:  Idris Guessous; Chiranjeev Dash; Pauline Lapin; Mary Doroshenk; Robert A Smith; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  A multilevel intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among community health center patients: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Elizabeth Medlin; Sandra Lisboa; Lisa Valley-Shah; Robert H Fletcher; Karen M Emmons; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  The cancer prevention and control research network.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Harris; Pamela K Brown; Steven Coughlin; Maria E Fernandez; James R Hebert; Jon Kerner; Marianne Prout; Randy Schwartz; Eduardo J Simoes; Carol White; Katherine Wilson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  15 in total

1.  Impact of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network: Accelerating the Translation of Research Into Practice.

Authors:  Kurt M Ribisl; Maria E Fernandez; Daniela B Friedman; Peggy A Hannon; Jennifer Leeman; Alexis Moore; Lindsay Olson; Marcia Ory; Betsy Risendal; Laura Sheble; Vicky M Taylor; Rebecca S Williams; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Refining the Patient Navigation Role in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Results From an Intervention Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan; Beth Slotman; Amy DeGroff; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Jennifer Murillo; Paul Schroy
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Patient navigator reported patient barriers and delivered activities in two large federally-funded cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Wendy E Barrington; Amy DeGroff; Stephanie Melillo; Thuy Vu; Allison Cole; Cam Escoffery; Natoshia Askelson; Laura Seegmiller; Sarah Koopman Gonzalez; Peggy Hannon
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  The early dissemination of patient navigation interventions: results of a respondent-driven sample survey.

Authors:  Patricia A Valverde; Elizabeth Calhoun; Angelina Esparza; Kristen J Wells; Betsy C Risendal
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elif Temucin; Nursen O Nahcivan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Characteristics of Effective Colorectal Cancer Screening Navigation Programs in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jermy-Leigh B Domingo; Kathryn L Braun
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2017

7.  A conceptual framework and metrics for evaluating multicomponent interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening within an organized screening program.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Sonja Hoover; Florence K L Tangka; Amy DeGroff; Cynthia S Soloe; Laura C Arena; Dara F Schlueter; Djenaba A Joseph; Faye L Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Correlates of Receipt of Colorectal Cancer Screening among American Indians in the Northern Plains.

Authors:  Soonhee Roh; Catherine E Burnette; Kyoung Hag Lee; Yeon-Shim Lee; R Turner Goins
Journal:  Soc Work Res       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  Reasons For Lack of Follow-up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Diego Llovet; Mardie Serenity; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Caroline A Bravo; Bronwen R McCurdy; Catherine Dubé; Nancy N Baxter; Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck; Amanda Peters; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Screening for colorectal cancer in people ages 45-49: research gaps, challenges and future directions for research and practice.

Authors:  Travis Hyams; Nora Mueller; Barbara Curbow; Evelyn King-Marshall; Shahnaz Sultan
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.