Literature DB >> 23719768

Optimal positioning of the humeral component in the reverse shoulder prosthesis.

L Nalbone1, R Adelfio, M D'Arienzo, T Ingrassia, V Nigrelli, F Zabbara, P Paladini, F Campi, A Pellegrini, G Porcellini.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Total reverse shoulder arthroplasty is becoming more and more the standard therapeutic practice for glenohumeral arthropathy with massive lesions of the rotator cuff. The biomechanical principle of this prosthesis is represented by the reversion of the normal anatomy of the shoulder joint. This non-anatomical prosthesis leads to a medialization of the rotation centre of the glenohumeral joint and also to a distalization of the humeral head. All that causes a deltoid tension increasing so allowing a larger abduction of the arm. Main complications of the reverse shoulder prosthesis are due to the joint instability, the scapular notching and the wear of the polyethylene insert.
PURPOSE: The main goal of the present work is to study the effect of the positioning of the humeral component on the intrinsic stability of the reverse shoulder prosthesis. In particular, through finite element method simulations, the variation of the stability ratio of the shoulder joint has been calculated for both vertical and horizontal dislocating loads depending on the humeral stem version angle. Moreover, in order to estimate the wear of the polyethylene cup, some analyses have been developed to calculate the pressures on the polyethylene insert.
RESULTS: The obtained results demonstrate the dislocation of a shoulder prosthesis and the wear of the polyethylene insert can be prevented or limited by conveniently varying the version angle of the humeral component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23719768     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-013-0274-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  22 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of dynamic shoulder motion in patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young W Kwon; Vivek J Pinto; Jangwhon Yoon; Mark A Frankle; Page E Dunning; Ali Sheikhzadeh
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  The effect of component positioning on intrinsic stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Favre; Patrick S Sussmann; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Influence of glenohumeral conformity on glenoid stresses after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Terrier; Philippe Büchler; Alain Farron
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis (Delta III) in acute shoulder fractures: technical considerations with respect to stability.

Authors:  Peter Van Seymortier; Daniel Stoffelen; Yves Fortems; Piet Reynders
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  Hierarchy of stability factors in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Tony S Keller; Jonathan C Levy; William E Lee; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Primary stability in reversed-anatomy glenoid components.

Authors:  A R Hopkins; U N Hansen
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Effect of deltoid tension and humeral version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Heath B Henninger; Alexej Barg; Andrew E Anderson; Kent N Bachus; Robert Z Tashjian; Robert T Burks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  Derek Cuff; Derek Pupello; Nazeem Virani; Jonathan Levy; Mark Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

10.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models.

Authors:  Stefano Petrillo; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Alessandra Berton; Andreas Kontaxis; Timothy Wright; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 2.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty without subscapularis repair for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  F A Grassi; I Zorzolo
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

4.  Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study.

Authors:  F A de Boer; P M van Kampen; P E Huijsmans
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-03

5.  Tuberosity Healing after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Is there Clinical Improvement?

Authors:  Luís Henrique Barros; Sérgio Figueiredo; Manuel Marques; Claudia Rodrigues; Joaquim Ramos; Rui Claro
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-02-07

Review 6.  The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Sergio De Salvatore; Alessandra Berton; Ilaria Piergentili; Benedetta Bandini; Alberto Lalli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Does Humeral Component Version Affect Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shivan S Jassim; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Eugene T Ek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.