Literature DB >> 22036549

Kinematic analysis of dynamic shoulder motion in patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Young W Kwon1, Vivek J Pinto, Jangwhon Yoon, Mark A Frankle, Page E Dunning, Ali Sheikhzadeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been used to treat patients with irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction. Despite the proven clinical efficacy, there is minimal information regarding the underlying changes to the shoulder kinematics associated with this construct. Therefore, we sought to examine the kinematics of dynamic shoulder motion in patients with well-functioning rTSA.
METHODS: We tested 12 healthy subjects and 17 patients with rTSA. All rTSA patients were able to elevate their arms to at least 90° and received the implant as the primary arthroplasty at least 6 months before testing. On average, the rTSA patients elevated their arms to 112° ± 12° (mean ± SD) and reported an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons outcome score of 90.6 ± 6.3. A 3-dimensional electromagnetic motion capture device was used to detect the dynamic motion of the trunk, scapula, and humerus during bilateral active shoulder elevation along the sagittal, scapular, and coronal planes.
RESULTS: In both healthy and rTSA shoulders, the majority of the humeral-thoracic motion was provided by the glenohumeral motion. Therefore, the ratio of glenohumeral to scapulothoracic (ST) motion was always greater than 1.62 during elevation along the scapular plane. In comparison to healthy subjects, however, the contribution of ST motion to overall shoulder motion was significantly increased in the rTSA shoulders. This increased contribution was noted in all planes of shoulder elevation and was maintained when weights were attached to the arm.
CONCLUSION: Kinematics of the rTSA shoulders are significantly altered, and more ST motion is used to achieve shoulder elevation.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036549     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  14 in total

1.  Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load.

Authors:  Joshua W Giles; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Optimal positioning of the humeral component in the reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  L Nalbone; R Adelfio; M D'Arienzo; T Ingrassia; V Nigrelli; F Zabbara; P Paladini; F Campi; A Pellegrini; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-05-30

3.  Development of a method for analyzing three-dimensional scapula kinematics.

Authors:  William E Janes; J M Brown; J M Essenberg; J R Engsberg
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-12

4.  Assessment of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the scapula-weighted Constant-Murley score.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Ilaria Parel; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Maria Vittoria Filippi; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont-style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l'Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Francesco Cuoghi; George S Athwal; Ilaria Parel; Maria V Filippi; Andrea G Cutti; Elisabetta Fabbri; Antonio Padolino; Paolo Paladini; Fabio Catani; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Is limited shoulder abduction associated with poor scapulothoracic mobility after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bernd Friesenbichler; Andrea Grassi; Cécile Grobet; Laurent Audigé; Barbara Wirth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Clinical Predictors for Optimal Forward Elevation in Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David R Sollaccio; Joseph J King; Aimee Struk; Kevin W Farmer; Thomas W Wright
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-02-28

8.  A quantitative analysis of the effect of baseplate and glenosphere position on deltoid lengthening in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan Wright; Christopher Potts; Mark P Smyth; Lisa Ferrara; John W Sperling; Thomas W Throckmorton
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

9.  Kinematics and EMG activity in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan A Smith; Katherine Woolley; Augustus Mazzocca; Richard Feinn; Mark Cote; Gregg Gomlinski; Juan Garbalosa; Karen M Myrick
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-30

10.  Factors influencing functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bettina Hochreiter; Anita Hasler; Julian Hasler; Philipp Kriechling; Paul Borbas; Christian Gerber
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.