Literature DB >> 23705874

Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0--a public library of challenging docking benchmark sets.

Matthias R Bauer1, Tamer M Ibrahim, Simon M Vogel, Frank M Boeckler.   

Abstract

The application of molecular benchmarking sets helps to assess the actual performance of virtual screening (VS) workflows. To improve the efficiency of structure-based VS approaches, the selection and optimization of various parameters can be guided by benchmarking. With the DEKOIS 2.0 library, we aim to further extend and complement the collection of publicly available decoy sets. Based on BindingDB bioactivity data, we provide 81 new and structurally diverse benchmark sets for a wide variety of different target classes. To ensure a meaningful selection of ligands, we address several issues that can be found in bioactivity data. We have improved our previously introduced DEKOIS methodology with enhanced physicochemical matching, now including the consideration of molecular charges, as well as a more sophisticated elimination of latent actives in the decoy set (LADS). We evaluate the docking performance of Glide, GOLD, and AutoDock Vina with our data sets and highlight existing challenges for VS tools. All DEKOIS 2.0 benchmark sets will be made accessible at http://www.dekois.com.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23705874     DOI: 10.1021/ci400115b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  29 in total

1.  Comparative modeling and benchmarking data sets for human histone deacetylases and sirtuin families.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Eyob Hailu Kebede; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Binding mode similarity measures for ranking of docking poses: a case study on the adenosine A2A receptor.

Authors:  Andrew Anighoro; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Rocker: Open source, easy-to-use tool for AUC and enrichment calculations and ROC visualization.

Authors:  Sakari Lätti; Sanna Niinivehmas; Olli T Pentikäinen
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  Exploring fragment-based target-specific ranking protocol with machine learning on cathepsin S.

Authors:  Yuwei Yang; Jianing Lu; Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 6.  Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.098

7.  Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Human Chemokine Receptors and Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Terry-Elinor Reid; Song Wu; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Property-Unmatched Decoys in Docking Benchmarks.

Authors:  Reed M Stein; Ying Yang; Trent E Balius; Matt J O'Meara; Jiankun Lyu; Jennifer Young; Khanh Tang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Small-Molecule Intervention At The Dimerization Interface Of Survivin By Novel Rigidized Scaffolds.

Authors:  Tamer M Ibrahim; Christoph Ernst; Andreas Lange; Susanne Hennig; Frank M Boeckler
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Hongnan Cao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.