Literature DB >> 33724022

FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening.

Hongyi Zhou1, Hongnan Cao1, Jeffrey Skolnick1.   

Abstract

To reduce time and cost, virtual ligand screening (VLS) often precedes experimental ligand screening in modern drug discovery. Traditionally, high-resolution structure-based docking approaches rely on experimental structures, while ligand-based approaches need known binders to the target protein and only explore their nearby chemical space. In contrast, our structure-based FINDSITEcomb2.0 approach takes advantage of predicted, low-resolution structures and information from ligands that bind distantly related proteins whose binding sites are similar to the target protein. Using a boosted tree regression machine learning framework, we significantly improved FINDSITEcomb2.0 by integrating ligand fragment scores as encoded by molecular fingerprints with the global ligand similarity scores of FINDSITEcomb2.0. The new approach, FRAGSITE, exploits our observation that ligand fragments, e.g., rings, tend to interact with stereochemically conserved protein subpockets that also occur in evolutionarily unrelated proteins. FRAGSITE was benchmarked on the 102 protein DUD-E set, where any template protein whose sequence identify >30% to the target was excluded. Within the top 100 ranked molecules, FRAGSITE improves VLS precision and recall by 14.3 and 18.5%, respectively, relative to FINDSITEcomb2.0. Moreover, the mean top 1% enrichment factor increases from 25.2 to 30.2. On average, both outperform state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods such as AtomNet. On the more challenging unbiased set LIT-PCBA, FRAGSITE also shows better performance than ligand similarity-based and docking approaches such as two-dimensional ECFP4 and Surflex-Dock v.3066. On a subset of 23 targets from DEKOIS 2.0, FRAGSITE shows much better performance than the boosted tree regression-based, vScreenML scoring function. Experimental testing of FRAGSITE's predictions shows that it has more hits and covers a more diverse region of chemical space than FINDSITEcomb2.0. For the two proteins that were experimentally tested, DHFR, a well-studied protein that catalyzes the conversion of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate, and the kinase ACVR1, FRAGSITE identified new small-molecule nanomolar binders. Interestingly, one new binder of DHFR is a kinase inhibitor predicted to bind in a new subpocket. For ACVR1, FRAGSITE identified new molecules that have diverse scaffolds and estimated nanomolar to micromolar affinities. Thus, FRAGSITE shows significant improvement over prior state-of-the-art ligand virtual screening approaches. A web server is freely available for academic users at http:/sites.gatech.edu/cssb/FRAGSITE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33724022      PMCID: PMC8243409          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  59 in total

1.  High-density miniaturized thermal shift assays as a general strategy for drug discovery.

Authors:  M W Pantoliano; E C Petrella; J D Kwasnoski; V S Lobanov; J Myslik; E Graf; T Carver; E Asel; B A Springer; P Lane; F R Salemme
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2001-12

2.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Homology Model and Docking-Based Virtual Screening for Ligands of the σ1 Receptor.

Authors:  Erik Laurini; Valentina Dal Col; Maria Grazia Mamolo; Daniele Zampieri; Paola Posocco; Maurizio Fermeglia; Luciano Vio; Sabrina Pricl
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Effects of FKBP12 and type II BMP receptors on signal transduction by ALK2 activating mutations associated with genetic disorders.

Authors:  Aiko Machiya; Sho Tsukamoto; Satoshi Ohte; Mai Kuratani; Mai Fujimoto; Keigo Kumagai; Kenji Osawa; Naoto Suda; Alex N Bullock; Takenobu Katagiri
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Insights into the slow-onset tight-binding inhibition of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: detailed mechanistic characterization of pyrrolo [3,2-f] quinazoline-1,3-diamine and its derivatives as novel tight-binding inhibitors.

Authors:  Bharath Srinivasan; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  FINDSITE(X): a structure-based, small molecule virtual screening approach with application to all identified human GPCRs.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Lieyang Chen; Anthony Cruz; Steven Ramsey; Callum J Dickson; Jose S Duca; Viktor Hornak; David R Koes; Tom Kurtzman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differential kinase activity of ACVR1 G328V and R206H mutations with implications to possible TβRI cross-talk in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Authors:  Hongnan Cao; Miao Jin; Mu Gao; Hongyi Zhou; Yizhi Jane Tao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  PubChem 2019 update: improved access to chemical data.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim; Jie Chen; Tiejun Cheng; Asta Gindulyte; Jia He; Siqian He; Qingliang Li; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Paul A Thiessen; Bo Yu; Leonid Zaslavsky; Jian Zhang; Evan E Bolton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Virtual discovery of melatonin receptor ligands to modulate circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Reed M Stein; Hye Jin Kang; John D McCorvy; Grant C Glatfelter; Anthony J Jones; Tao Che; Samuel Slocum; Xi-Ping Huang; Olena Savych; Yurii S Moroz; Benjamin Stauch; Linda C Johansson; Vadim Cherezov; Terry Kenakin; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet; Bryan L Roth; Margarita L Dubocovich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  Efficient Hit-to-Lead Searching of Kinase Inhibitor Chemical Space via Computational Fragment Merging.

Authors:  Grigorii V Andrianov; Wern Juin Gabriel Ong; Ilya Serebriiskii; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Implications of the Essential Role of Small Molecule Ligand Binding Pockets in Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 3.  Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.162

Review 4.  Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Eric Anthony Chen; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.927

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.