Literature DB >> 2370043

Chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization of human gonosomes and autosomes and its use in clinical cytogenetics.

A Jauch1, C Daumer, P Lichter, J Murken, T Schroeder-Kurth, T Cremer.   

Abstract

DNA libraries from sorted human gonosomes were used selectively to stain the X and Y chromosomes in normal and aberrant cultured human cells by chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS-) hybridization. The entire X chromosome was stained in metaphase spreads. Interphase chromosome domains of both the active and inactive X were clearly delineated. CISS-hybridization of the Y chromosome resulted in the specific decoration of the euchromatic part (Ypter-q11), whereas the heterochromatic part (Yq12) remained unlabeled. The stained part of the Y chromosome formed a compact domain in interphase nuclei. This approach was applied to amniotic fluid cells containing a ring chromosome of unknown origin (47,XY: +r). The ring chromosome was not stained by library probes from the gonosomes, thereby suggesting its autosomal origin. The sensitivity of CISS-hybridization was demonstrated by the detection of small translocations and fragments in human lymphocyte metaphase spreads after irradiation with 60Co-gamma-rays. Lymphocyte cultures from two XX-males were investigated by CISS-hybridization with Y-library probes. In both cases, metaphase spreads demonstrated a translocation of Yp-material to the short arm of an X chromosome. The translocated Y-material could also be demonstrated directly in interphase nuclei. CISS-hybridization of autosomes 7 and 13 was used for prenatal diagnosis in a case with a known balanced translocation t(7:13) in the father. The same translocation was observed in amniotic fluid cells from the fetus. Specific staining of the chromosomes involved in such translocations will be particularly important, in the future, in cases that cannot be solved reliably by conventional chromosome banding alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2370043     DOI: 10.1007/bf00193186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  31 in total

1.  Marker chromosomes in a series of 10,000 prenatal diagnoses. Cytogenetic and follow-up studies.

Authors:  E S Sachs; J O Van Hemel; J C Den Hollander; M G Jahoda
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones.

Authors:  P Lichter; C J Tang; K Call; G Hermanson; G A Evans; D Housman; D C Ward
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Assignment of human desmin gene to band 2q35 by nonradioactive in situ hybridization.

Authors:  E Viegas-Péquignot; Z L Li; B Dutrillaux; F Apiou; D Paulin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Cytogenetic analysis by in situ hybridization with fluorescently labeled nucleic acid probes.

Authors:  D Pinkel; J W Gray; B Trask; G van den Engh; J Fuscoe; H van Dekken
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1986

5.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Rapid detection of human chromosome 21 aberrations by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; C J Tang; P C Watkins; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rabl's model of the interphase chromosome arrangement tested in Chinese hamster cells by premature chromosome condensation and laser-UV-microbeam experiments.

Authors:  T Cremer; C Cremer; H Baumann; E K Luedtke; K Sperling; V Teuber; C Zorn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories.

Authors:  M Schardin; T Cremer; H D Hager; M Lang
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Chromosomal localization of a unique gene by non-autoradiographic in situ hybridization.

Authors:  J E Landegent; N Jansen in de Wal; G J van Ommen; F Baas; J J de Vijlder; P van Duijn; M Van der Ploeg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Use of whole cosmid cloned genomic sequences for chromosomal localization by non-radioactive in situ hybridization.

Authors:  J E Landegent; N Jansen in de Wal; R W Dirks; F Baao; M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  26 in total

1.  Reciprocal translocation between the proximal regions of the long arms of chromosomes 13 and 15 resulting in unbalanced offspring: characterization by fluorescence in situ hybridization and DNA analysis.

Authors:  K Mangelschots; B Van Roy; F Speleman; N Van Roy; J Gheuens; J Beuten; I Buntinx; M N Van Thienen; H Willekens; J Dumon
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization after Giemsa banding.

Authors:  M Klever; C Grond-Ginsbach; H Scherthan; T M Schroeder-Kurth
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Analysis of reciprocal translocations by chromosome painting: applications and limitations of the technique.

Authors:  C Rosenberg; K J Blakemore; W G Kearns; R A Giraldez; C S Escallon; P L Pearson; G Stetten
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  N P Carter; M A Ferguson-Smith; M T Perryman; H Telenius; A H Pelmear; M A Leversha; M T Glancy; S L Wood; K Cook; H M Dyson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of XX males using Y-specific DNA sequences, including SRY.

Authors:  B Van der Auwera; N Van Roy; A De Paepe; J R Hawkins; I Liebaers; S Castedo; J Dumon; F Speleman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Authors:  K Klinger; G Landes; D Shook; R Harvey; L Lopez; P Locke; T Lerner; R Osathanondh; B Leverone; T Houseal
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Chromosome in situ suppression hybridisation in human male meiosis.

Authors:  A S Goldman; M A Hultén
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Chromosome-band-specific painting: chromosome in situ suppression hybridization using PCR products from a microdissected chromosome band as a probe pool.

Authors:  H X Deng; K Yoshiura; R W Dirks; N Harada; T Hirota; K Tsukamoto; Y Jinno; N Niikawa
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Homologies in human and Macaca fuscata chromosomes revealed by in situ suppression hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries.

Authors:  J Wienberg; R Stanyon; A Jauch; T Cremer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Chromosome in situ suppression hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  M A Hulten; C P Gould; A S Goldman; J J Waters
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.