Literature DB >> 2437554

Marker chromosomes in a series of 10,000 prenatal diagnoses. Cytogenetic and follow-up studies.

E S Sachs, J O Van Hemel, J C Den Hollander, M G Jahoda.   

Abstract

In a series of 10,000 prenatal diagnoses 15 marker chromosomes were detected in our centre. Six of these were familial whilst nine had originated de novo. They were analysed with various staining methods. DA-DAPI staining was positive in nine out of 12 pregnancies. Six pregnancies were continued. Five normal children were born, one ended in intrauterine fetal death of a normal fetus at 37 weeks. Nine pregnancies were terminated, showing six normal fetuses, one familial cat-eye syndrome, one fetus with Down syndrome caused by additional trisomy 21 and one fetus with cystic kidneys resp. It is concluded that it seems safe to continue the pregnancy in cases of familial marker, identical to that of one parent, whilst a de novo DA-DAPI positive marker seems to present a low risk for fetal anomalies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2437554     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970070204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  15 in total

1.  Redefining the risks of prenatally ascertained supernumerary marker chromosomes: a collaborative study.

Authors:  M D Graf; L Christ; J T Mascarello; P Mowrey; M Pettenati; G Stetten; P Storto; U Surti; D L Van Dyke; G H Vance; D Wolff; S Schwartz
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization of human gonosomes and autosomes and its use in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  A Jauch; C Daumer; P Lichter; J Murken; T Schroeder-Kurth; T Cremer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Familial small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) (14)(:p11-q11:) [corrected] in a child with translocation Down syndrome.

Authors:  Babu Rao Vundinti; Seema Korgaonkar; Kanjaksha Ghosh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Update and Review: Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes.

Authors:  S Ungerleider
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  When risk factors have little meaning.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989 Dec 23-30

7.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Characterization of supernumerary ring marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Authors:  E Blennow; G Annerén; T H Bui; E Berggren; E Asadi; M Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Complete and precise characterization of marker chromosomes by application of microdissection in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  J Müller-Navia; A Nebel; E Schleiermacher
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Small marker chromosomes in two patients with segmental aneusomy for proximal 17p.

Authors:  Christine J Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; Gabriel Bien-Willner; Scott C Bello; Chad A Shaw; Marta Carrera; Luis Perez Jurado; Xavier Estivill; James R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.