Literature DB >> 23696517

"If it helps..." the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: patient and partners reflections.

Sarah C Hillman1, John Skelton, Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones, Amie Wilson, Mark D Kilby.   

Abstract

The objective was to gain insight into the experiences of women and their partners diagnosed with a fetal abnormality on prenatal ultrasound examination and receiving genetic testing including microarray. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were performed with women +/- their partners after receiving the results of prenatal genetic testing. Framework analysis was performed to elicit themes and subthemes. Five main themes were recognized; diagnosis, genetic testing, family and support, reflections of the treatment received and emotions. Our results showed that women recall being told about QFPCR for trisomy 13, 18, and 21 but often no further testing. Women expected the conventional karyotype and microarray result would be normal following a normal QFPCR result. There were frequent misconceptions by couples regarding aspects of counseling/testing. Communication of variants of unknown (clinical) significance (VOUS) presents a particularly difficult challenge. Good clear communication by health care professionals is paramount. When counseling women and their partners for fetal chromosomal testing it should be reinforced that although the most common, trisomy 13, 18, and 21 only account for some of the chromosomal changes resulting in abnormal scan findings. Couples should have literature to take home summarizing scan anomalies and reinforcing information about genetic testing.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696517     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  14 in total

1.  An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Katherine Kellom; Alexandra Barbarese; W Andrew Faucett; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 3.  Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Judith L M McCoyd; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.

Authors:  Jessica Baker; Cheryl Shuman; David Chitayat; Syed Wasim; Nan Okun; Johannes Keunen; Renee Hofstedter; Rachel Silver
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Expert Knowledge Influences Decision-Making for Couples Receiving Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing Results.

Authors:  M A Rubel; A Werner-Lin; F K Barg; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09

6.  Pregnant Genetic Counselors in an Era of Advanced Genomic Tests: What Do the Experts Test Prenatally?

Authors:  Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Yael Hashiloni-Dolev
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Genetic Counseling for Couples Seeking Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Japan: Experiences of Pregnant Women and their Partners.

Authors:  Motoko Watanabe; Mari Matsuo; Masaki Ogawa; Toshitaka Uchiyama; Satoru Shimizu; Naoko Iwasaki; Akemi Yamauchi; Mari Urano; Hironao Numabe; Kayoko Saito
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  What results to disclose, when, and who decides? Healthcare professionals' views on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Angela Fenwick; Sandi Dheensa; Diana Wellesley; Anneke M Lucassen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Couples experiences of receiving uncertain results following prenatal microarray or exome sequencing: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Eleanor Harding; Jennifer Hammond; Lyn S Chitty; Melissa Hill; Celine Lewis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.242

Review 10.  The role of next-generation sequencing in the investigation of ultrasound-identified fetal structural anomalies.

Authors:  M D Kilby
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 7.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.