Literature DB >> 29502146

Pregnant Genetic Counselors in an Era of Advanced Genomic Tests: What Do the Experts Test Prenatally?

Shiri Shkedi-Rafid1, Yael Hashiloni-Dolev2.   

Abstract

Advanced genomic tests in pregnancy, such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), provide higher detection rates yet often produce probabilistic and uncertain information. This study aimed to understand how the most knowledgeable patients, i.e., pregnant genetic counselors, act in their own pregnancies, thereby gaining insight into the impact of patients' knowledge on the diagnostic process. Seventeen interviews were conducted with Israeli genetic counselors, either pregnant or up to 2 years post-pregnancy. A third of the participants chose not to have CMA while two thirds underwent it despite no detected abnormalities. Although knowledge was the main motivation, counselors varied in the desired degree of information. Two thirds of those opting for CMA wished to have all findings identified whereas roughly one third asked for a targeted platform seeking to avoid uncertain results. Counselors were not quick to adopt new tests such as whole-exome sequencing. Being knowledgeable was described as promoting a sense of control yet also being a source of stress and moral dilemmas. While the basic premise of informed consent is crucial, it does not always make things easier for educated patients. Consequently, raising levels of patient knowledge is only a limited step forward in the search for best practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advaced-genomic-tests; Chromosomal-microarray-analysis (CMA); Genetic counselors; Knowledge; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502146     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0234-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

1.  Array CGH in routine prenatal diagnosis practice.

Authors:  Pietro Cavalli; Ugo Cavallari; Antonio Novelli
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities.

Authors:  Suzanne Drury; Hywel Williams; Natalie Trump; Christopher Boustred; Nicholas Lench; Richard H Scott; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Risk communication in the clinical consultation.

Authors:  Richard Thomson; Adrian Edwards; Jenny Grey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Genetic counselling and ethical issues with chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal testing.

Authors:  George McGillivray; Jill A Rosenfeld; R J McKinlay Gardner; Lynn H Gillam
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  "Something Extra on Chromosome 5": Parents' Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Allison Werner-Lin; Amita Russell; Ronald J Wapner; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  A prospective study of the clinical utility of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and an exploration of a framework for reporting unclassified variants and risk factors.

Authors:  Paul Daniel Brady; Barbara Delle Chiaie; Gabrielle Christenhusz; Kris Dierickx; Kris Van Den Bogaert; Bjorn Menten; Sandra Janssens; Paul Defoort; Ellen Roets; Elke Sleurs; Kathelijn Keymolen; Luc De Catte; Jan Deprest; Thomy de Ravel; Hilde Van Esch; Jean Pierre Fryns; Koenraad Devriendt; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  A new direction for prenatal chromosome microarray testing: software-targeting for detection of clinically significant chromosome imbalance without equivocal findings.

Authors:  Joo Wook Ahn; Susan Bint; Melita D Irving; Phillipa M Kyle; Ranjit Akolekar; Shehla N Mohammed; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  First applications of a targeted exome sequencing approach in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities reveals an important fraction of cases with associated gene defects.

Authors:  Constantinos Pangalos; Birgitta Hagnefelt; Konstantinos Lilakos; Christopher Konialis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations.

Authors:  Jill A Rosenfeld; Bradley P Coe; Evan E Eichler; Howard Cuckle; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Exome Sequencing in Fetuses with Structural Malformations.

Authors:  Fiona L Mackie; Keren J Carss; Sarah C Hillman; Matthew E Hurles; Mark D Kilby
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.