Literature DB >> 23695871

Novel nasogastric tube-related criteria for urgent endoscopy in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Hiroyasu Iwasaki1, Takaya Shimura, Tomonori Yamada, Miho Aoki, Satoshi Nomura, Atsunori Kusakabe, Hiroshi Kanie, Tesshin Ban, Katsumi Hayashi, Takashi Joh, Etsuro Orito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with active upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) require urgent endoscopy, but appropriate criteria for urgent endoscopy in these patients have not yet been established. AIMS: The goal of this study is to establish a simple system for the selection of UGIB patients who may benefit from urgent endoscopy.
METHODS: Of the 335 patients who required emergency hospitalization for UGIB from May 2010 to March 2012 at Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, 166 patients who underwent placement of a nasogastric tube (NGT) were retrospectively identified. Active bleeding on the endoscopic image was used as an endpoint that reflected the need for urgent endoscopy.
RESULTS: The ratio of the heart rate to the systolic blood pressure (HR/SBP ratio) and aspiration of fresh or dark red fluid from the NGT [NGT(+)] were significant predictors of active bleeding in the univariate analysis [HR/SBP ratio, P=0.016; NGT(+), P<0.001]. The HR/SBP ratio [odds ratio (OR) 8.118; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.696-38.850; P=0.009] and NGT(+) (OR 4.630; 95% CI 2.092-10.204; P<0.001) were also significantly associated with active bleeding in the multivariate analysis. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a setting with HR/SBP ratio>1.4 or NGT(+) to be optimal criteria to predict active bleeding. These criteria were associated with a sensitivity of 64.9% (24/37) and a specificity of 76.7% (99/129) for the prediction of active bleeding; consequently, they are superior to the sensitivity and specificity of previously proposed criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel and simple criteria system using NGT(+) and HR/SBP is a good predictor of the need for urgent endoscopy in patients with nonvariceal UGIB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23695871     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2706-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of angiographic embolization with surgery after failed endoscopic hemostasis to bleeding peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Tiffany C L Wong; Ka-Tak Wong; Philip W Y Chiu; Anthony Y B Teoh; Simon C H Yu; Kim W L Au; James Y W Lau
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  The national ASGE survey on upper gastrointestinal bleeding. III. Endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  D A Gilbert; F E Silverstein; F J Tedesco; N K Buenger; J Persing
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Urgent endoscopy is associated with lower mortality in high-risk but not low-risk nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  L G Lim; K Y Ho; Y H Chan; P L Teoh; C J Khor; L L Lim; A Rajnakova; T Z Ong; K G Yeoh
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Trends in management and outcomes of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: 1993-2003.

Authors:  Laura E Targownik; Alice Nabalamba
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Endoscopy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage: is sooner better? A systematic review.

Authors:  B M Spiegel; N B Vakil; J J Ofman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-06-11

6.  Outcomes following acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to time to endoscopy: results from a nationwide study.

Authors:  V Jairath; B C Kahan; R F A Logan; S A Hearnshaw; C J Doré; S P L Travis; M F Murphy; K R Palmer
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Endoscopic hemostasis. An effective therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers.

Authors:  H S Sacks; T C Chalmers; A L Blum; J Berrier; D Pagano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ernst J Kuipers; Joseph Sung; Richard H Hunt; Myriam Martel; Paul Sinclair
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Is the Forrest classification a useful tool for planning endoscopic therapy of bleeding peptic ulcers?

Authors:  W Heldwein; J Schreiner; J Pedrazzoli; P Lehnert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Aljebreen; Carlo A Fallone; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal bleeding: who needs urgent endoscopic intervention?

Authors:  Denis M McCarthy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Do we use more NGT than needed?

Authors:  Javier Martínez-González; Marta Aicart-Ramos; Jose Ramón Foruny; Antonio López San Román; Agustín Albillos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Early lactate clearance for predicting active bleeding in critically ill patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tomoki Wada; Akiyoshi Hagiwara; Tatsuki Uemura; Naoki Yahagi; Akio Kimura
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.397

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.