Literature DB >> 21360421

Urgent endoscopy is associated with lower mortality in high-risk but not low-risk nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

L G Lim1, K Y Ho, Y H Chan, P L Teoh, C J Khor, L L Lim, A Rajnakova, T Z Ong, K G Yeoh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The role of urgent endoscopy in high-risk nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed sooner than the currently recommended 24 h in high-risk patients presenting with NVUGIB is associated with lower all-cause in-hospital mortality.
METHODS: All adult patients undergoing EGD for the indications of coffee-grounds vomitus, hematemesis or melena at a university hospital over an 18-month period were enrolled. Patients with variceal and lower gastrointestinal bleeding were excluded. Data were prospectively collected.
RESULTS: A total of 934 patients were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) was 0.813 for predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality, with a cut-off score of ≥ 12 resulting in 90 % specificity. In low-risk patients with GBS < 12, presentation-to-endoscopy time in those who died and in those who survived was similar. In high-risk patients with GBS of ≥ 12, presentation-to-endoscopy time was significantly longer in those who died than in those who survived. Multivariate analysis of the high-risk cohort showed presentation-to-endoscopy time to be the only factor associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality. For high-risk patients, the AUROC for presentation-to-endoscopy time in predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality was 0.803, with a sensitivity of 100 % at the cut-off time of 13 h. All-cause in-hospital mortality in high-risk patients was significantly higher in those with presentation-to-endoscopy time of > 13 h compared with those undergoing endoscopy in < 13 h from presentation (44 % vs. 0 %; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy within 13 h of presentation was associated with lower mortality in high-risk but not low-risk NVUGIB. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21360421     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  46 in total

1.  A 77-year-old man with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Kyle J Fortinsky; Nathan M Stall; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Gastrointestinal bleeding: who needs urgent endoscopic intervention?

Authors:  Denis M McCarthy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?

Authors:  Sara Monteiro; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Joana Magalhães; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 4.  Stress-related mucosal disease in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Marc Bardou; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Alan Barkun
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.

Authors:  Juan G Martínez-Cara; Rita Jiménez-Rosales; Margarita Úbeda-Muñoz; Mercedes López de Hierro; Javier de Teresa; Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Can the presence of endoscopic high-risk stigmata be predicted before endoscopy? A multivariable analysis using the RUGBE database.

Authors:  Yen-I Chen; Jonathan Wyse; Alan Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ian Gralnek; Myriam Martel
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06

7.  Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?

Authors:  Sung Hoon Jung; Jung Hwan Oh; Hye Yeon Lee; Joon Won Jeong; Se Eun Go; Chan Ran You; Eun Jung Jeon; Sang Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-ulcer and Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Risk Prediction Using a Scoring System.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Park; Seong Woo Jeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  A pilot study of single-use endoscopy in screening acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Jae Hee Cho; Hee Man Kim; Sangheun Lee; Yu Jin Kim; Ki Jun Han; Hyeon Geun Cho; Si Young Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Volunteer Case Series of a New Telemetric Sensor for Blood Detection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: The HemoPill.

Authors:  Sebastian Schostek; Melanie Zimmermann; Jan Keller; Mario Fode; Michael Melbert; Marc O Schurr; Thomas Gottwald; Ruediger L Prosst
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.