| Literature DB >> 23690876 |
Bin Li1, Kan Chen, Lianfang Tian, Yao Yeboah, Shanxing Ou.
Abstract
The segmentation and detection of various types of nodules in a Computer-aided detection (CAD) system present various challenges, especially when (1) the nodule is connected to a vessel and they have very similar intensities; (2) the nodule with ground-glass opacity (GGO) characteristic possesses typical weak edges and intensity inhomogeneity, and hence it is difficult to define the boundaries. Traditional segmentation methods may cause problems of boundary leakage and "weak" local minima. This paper deals with the above mentioned problems. An improved detection method which combines a fuzzy integrated active contour model (FIACM)-based segmentation method, a segmentation refinement method based on Parametric Mixture Model (PMM) of juxta-vascular nodules, and a knowledge-based C-SVM (Cost-sensitive Support Vector Machines) classifier, is proposed for detecting various types of pulmonary nodules in computerized tomography (CT) images. Our approach has several novel aspects: (1) In the proposed FIACM model, edge and local region information is incorporated. The fuzzy energy is used as the motivation power for the evolution of the active contour. (2) A hybrid PMM Model of juxta-vascular nodules combining appearance and geometric information is constructed for segmentation refinement of juxta-vascular nodules. Experimental results of detection for pulmonary nodules show desirable performances of the proposed method.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23690876 PMCID: PMC3652289 DOI: 10.1155/2013/515386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Overview of the proposed detection method for pulmonary nodules.
Figure 2Intensity values, shape index values, and the degree of membership of a GGO juxtavascular pulmonary nodule and its attached vessel. (a) Original CT image; (b) intensity of juxtavascular nodule; (c) shape index values of juxtavascular nodule; (d) the degree of membership of vessel before the fuzzy morphological filtering; (e) the degree of membership of juxtavascular nodule; (f) intensity of vessel; (g) shape index values of vessel; (h) the degree of membership of vessel before the fuzzy morphological filtering; and (i) the degree of membership of vessel after the fuzzy morphological filtering.
Figure 3The specified edge-stopping function.
Features calculation of every potential nodule object.
| Features | Definition | |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity | Mean value |
|
| Standard deviation |
| |
| Mean | In 3D space | |
| Standard deviation | In 3D space | |
|
| ||
| Position | Centroid ( |
|
|
| ||
| Shape | Area |
|
| Perimeter |
| |
| Diameter | Long axis in 2D space, | |
| Ellipticity |
| |
| Circularity |
| |
| Slenderness |
| |
| Rectangle degree |
| |
| Compactness |
| |
| Concavity ratio |
| |
| Volume | In 3D space | |
| Volumetric quotient | In 3D space | |
| The long axis of the circumsphere | In 3D space | |
|
| ||
| Texture | Energy, contrast, entropy, and adverse moment | In 2D space |
The number of GGO, juxtavascular, and other nodules.
| Nodule type | GGO pulmonary nodule | Juxtavascular pulmonary nodule | Others | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 49 | 80 | 35 | 164 |
Figure 4Segmentation result of a nonsolid GGO pulmonary nodule. (a) Original CT image; (b) the segmentation result carried out by experts; (c) the segmentation result by region-based active contour model; (d) the segmentation result by integrated active contour model; and (e) the segmentation result by the proposed FIACM model.
Figure 5Segmentation results of the juxtavascular pulmonary nodule. (a) Original CT image, nodule adjacent to blood vessels; (b) whole segmentation result by FIACM-based method; and (c) segmented juxtavascular nodule after the fine segmentation by using PMM-based refinement method.
Figure 6Segmentation results of the juxtavascular pulmonary nodule. (a) Original CT image; (b) the segmentation result carried out by experts; (c) the segmentation result by region-based active contour model; (d) the segmentation result by integrated active contour model; and (e) the segmentation result by the proposed FIACM-based segmentation and PMM-based refinement method.
Segmentation measure results (error rate).
| CT image | The edge-based active model | The region-based active mode | The classical integrated active contour model | The proposed active contour model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGO pulmonary nodule | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 0.11 | FIACM-based segmentation |
| Juxtavascular pulmonary nodule | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.13 | FIACM-based segmentation + PMM-based refinement |
Experimental training data set (60 scans with 78 nodules).
| Data set | Positive samples | Negative samples | Feature number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary nodules | 78 | 1299 | 21 |
K-fold CV results using the grid search for optimal parameters of C-SVM classifier.
| Parameters | TP | FN | TN | FP | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18 | 9 | 85 | 21 | 0.667 | 0.802 | 0.774 | 0.7529 |
|
| 13 | 7 | 72 | 8 | 0.650 | 0.9 | 0.85 | 0.7769 |
|
| 11 | 4 | 52 | 11 | 0.733 | 0.825 | 0.808 | 0.7359 |
|
| 10 | 3 | 46 | 7 | 0.769 | 0.868 | 0.848 | 0.7688 |
|
| 7 | 4 | 42 | 3 | 0.636 | 0.933 | 0.875 | 0.7769 |
|
| 7 | 2 | 36 | 3 | 0.778 | 0.923 | 0.896 | 0.8610 |
|
| 7 | 1 | 32 | 3 | 0.875 | 0.914 | 0.907 | 0.9116 |
|
| 7 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 0.875 | 0.968 | 0.949 | 0.9159 |
Detection performance of the proposed method on the testing dataset (60 scans with 86 nodules).
| Total nodule | Nodule detected | Accuracy rate | FP per scan | Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | 83 | 95.4% | 1.1/scan | 88.2% |
The variation of nodule detection performance over all cases on independence testing data based on the proposed method.
| Highest | Lowest | STD (standard deviation) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 100% | 64% | 0.089 |
| Specificity | 100% | 81% | 0.093 |
| False positive | 6 | 1 | 1.7 |
Figure 7Detection result of the case containing a small GGO nodule.
Figure 8Detection result of the case containing a small pure GGO nodule.
Figure 9Detection results of the case containing a juxtavascular nodule.
The different nodule sizes on independent testing data.
| Nodule type | ≤5 mm | 5–10 mm | 10–20 mm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGO pulmonary nodule | 3 | 10 | 16 | 29 |
| Juxtavascular pulmonary nodule | 2 | 27 | 12 | 41 |
| Others | 4 | 6 | 8 | 18 |
Detection performance for GGO and juxtavascular pulmonary nodules (60 scans).
| Nodule type | Total nodule | Nodule detected | Detection rate | FP per scan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGO pulmonary nodule | 29 | 28 | 96.5% | 2.7/scan |
| Juxtavascular pulmonary nodule | 41 | 39 | 95.1% | 3.1/scan |