PURPOSE: Research on the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model and practice redesign has not focused on the unique challenges and strengths of very small primary care practices serving disadvantaged patient populations. We analyzed the practice characteristics, prior experiences, and dimensions of the PCMH model that exist in such practices participating in the Primary Care Information Project (PCIP) of the New York City Department of Mental Health and Hygiene. METHODS: We obtained descriptive data, focusing on PCMH, for 94 primary care practices with 5 or fewer clinicians serving high volumes of Medicaid and minority patient populations in New York City. Data included information extracted from PCIP administrative data and survey data collected specifically for this study. RESULTS: Survey results indicated substantial implementation of key aspects of the PCMH among small practices serving disadvantaged patient populations, despite considerable potential challenges to achieving PCMH implementation. Practices tended to use few formal mechanisms, such as formal care teams and designated care or case managers, but there was considerable evidence of use of informal team-based care and care coordination nonetheless. It appears that many of these practices achieved the spirit, if not the letter, of the law in terms of key dimensions of PCMH. CONCLUSIONS: Small practices can achieve important aspects of the PCMH model of primary care, often with informal rather than formal mechanisms and strategies. The use of flexible, less formal strategies is important to keep in mind when considering implementation and assessment of PCMH-like initiatives in small practices.
PURPOSE: Research on the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model and practice redesign has not focused on the unique challenges and strengths of very small primary care practices serving disadvantaged patient populations. We analyzed the practice characteristics, prior experiences, and dimensions of the PCMH model that exist in such practices participating in the Primary Care Information Project (PCIP) of the New York City Department of Mental Health and Hygiene. METHODS: We obtained descriptive data, focusing on PCMH, for 94 primary care practices with 5 or fewer clinicians serving high volumes of Medicaid and minority patient populations in New York City. Data included information extracted from PCIP administrative data and survey data collected specifically for this study. RESULTS: Survey results indicated substantial implementation of key aspects of the PCMH among small practices serving disadvantaged patient populations, despite considerable potential challenges to achieving PCMH implementation. Practices tended to use few formal mechanisms, such as formal care teams and designated care or case managers, but there was considerable evidence of use of informal team-based care and care coordination nonetheless. It appears that many of these practices achieved the spirit, if not the letter, of the law in terms of key dimensions of PCMH. CONCLUSIONS: Small practices can achieve important aspects of the PCMH model of primary care, often with informal rather than formal mechanisms and strategies. The use of flexible, less formal strategies is important to keep in mind when considering implementation and assessment of PCMH-like initiatives in small practices.
Authors: Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth E Stewart; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mark W Friedberg; Dana G Safran; Kathryn L Coltin; Marguerite Dresser; Eric C Schneider Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jacqueline R Halladay; Kathleen Mottus; Kristin Reiter; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue; Wilson M Gabbard; Kimberly Gush Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Lisa D DiMartino; Sarah A Birken; Laura C Hanson; Justin G Trogdon; Alecia S Clary; Morris Weinberger; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Bryan J Weiner Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2018 Jul/Sep
Authors: Alison B Hamilton; Julian Brunner; Cindy Cain; Emmeline Chuang; Tana M Luger; Ismelda Canelo; Lisa Rubenstein; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Timothy W Farrell; Leif I Solberg; Carolyn A Berry; Neil S Calman; Peter F Cronholm; Katrina E Donahue; David L Driscoll; Diane Hauser; Jeanne W McAllister; Sanjeev N Mehta; Robert J Reid; Ming Tai-Seale; Christopher G Wise; Michael D Fetters; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Hector P Rodriguez; Cherie P Brunker; Erin L McGinley; Rachel L Day; Debra L Scammon; Michael I Harrison; Janice L Genevro; Robert A Gabbay; Michael K Magill Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2016-10-23 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Carissa van den Berk-Clark; Emily Doucette; Fred Rottnek; William Manard; Mayra Aragon Prada; Rachel Hughes; Tyler Lawrence; F David Schneider Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Donna Shelley; Batel Blechter; Nina Siman; Nan Jiang; Charles Cleland; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Stephen Williams; Winfred Wu; Erin Rogers; Carolyn Berry Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Donna R Shelley; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Sheila Anane; Winfred Y Wu; Keith Goldfeld; Heather T Gold; Sue Kaplan; Carolyn Berry Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 7.327