Donna Shelley1, Batel Blechter2, Nina Siman2, Nan Jiang2, Charles Cleland3, Gbenga Ogedegbe2, Stephen Williams2, Winfred Wu4, Erin Rogers2, Carolyn Berry2,5. 1. School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York Donna.Shelley@nyumc.org. 2. School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York. 3. Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University New York, New York. 4. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York. 5. School of Public Service, New York University, New York, New York. New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We wanted to describe small, independent primary care practices' performance in meeting the Million Hearts ABCSs (aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking screening and counseling), as well as on a composite measure that captured the extent to which multiple clinical targets are achieved for patients with a history of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We also explored relationships between practice characteristics and ABCS measures. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, bivariate analysis using baseline data from 134 practices in New York City. ABCS data were extracted from practices' electronic health records and aggregated to the site level. Practice characteristics were obtained from surveys of clinicians and staff at each practice. RESULTS: The proportion of at-risk patients meeting clinical goals for each of the ABCS measures was 73.0% for aspirin use, 69.6% for blood pressure, 66.7% for cholesterol management, and 74.2% screened for smoking and counseled. For patients with a history of ASCVD, only 49% were meeting all ABC (aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol management) targets (ie, composite measure). Solo practices were more likely to meet clinical guidelines for aspirin (risk ratio [RR] =1.17, P =.007) and composite (RR=1.29, P = .011) than practices with multiple clinicians. CONCLUSION: Achieving targets for ABCS measures varied considerably across practices; however, small practices were meeting or exceeding Million Hearts goals (ie, 70% or greater). Practices were less likely to meet consistently clinical targets that apply to patients with a history of ASCVD risk factors. Greater emphasis is needed on providing support for small practices to address the complexity of managing patients with multiple risk factors for primary and secondary ASCVD.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: We wanted to describe small, independent primary care practices' performance in meeting the Million Hearts ABCSs (aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking screening and counseling), as well as on a composite measure that captured the extent to which multiple clinical targets are achieved for patients with a history of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We also explored relationships between practice characteristics and ABCS measures. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, bivariate analysis using baseline data from 134 practices in New York City. ABCS data were extracted from practices' electronic health records and aggregated to the site level. Practice characteristics were obtained from surveys of clinicians and staff at each practice. RESULTS: The proportion of at-risk patients meeting clinical goals for each of the ABCS measures was 73.0% for aspirin use, 69.6% for blood pressure, 66.7% for cholesterol management, and 74.2% screened for smoking and counseled. For patients with a history of ASCVD, only 49% were meeting all ABC (aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol management) targets (ie, composite measure). Solo practices were more likely to meet clinical guidelines for aspirin (risk ratio [RR] =1.17, P =.007) and composite (RR=1.29, P = .011) than practices with multiple clinicians. CONCLUSION: Achieving targets for ABCS measures varied considerably across practices; however, small practices were meeting or exceeding Million Hearts goals (ie, 70% or greater). Practices were less likely to meet consistently clinical targets that apply to patients with a history of ASCVD risk factors. Greater emphasis is needed on providing support for small practices to address the complexity of managing patients with multiple risk factors for primary and secondary ASCVD.
Authors: Carlos Roberto Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Raymond F Palmer; Robert L Ferrer; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Elizabeth E Stewart; Robert Wood; Marivel Davila; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Carlos Roberto Jaén; Robert L Ferrer; William L Miller; Raymond F Palmer; Robert Wood; Marivel Davila; Elizabeth E Stewart; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Vera Bittner; Marnie Bertolet; Rafael Barraza Felix; Michael E Farkouh; Suzanne Goldberg; Kodangudi B Ramanathan; J Bruce Redmon; Laurence Sperling; Martin K Rutter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Diane R Rittenhouse; Lawrence P Casalino; Stephen M Shortell; Sean R McClellan; Robin R Gillies; Jeffrey A Alexander; Melinda L Drum Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Bijal A Balasubramanian; Deborah J Cohen; Elizabeth C Clark; Nicole F Isaacson; Dorothy Y Hung; L Miriam Dickinson; Douglas H Fernald; Larry A Green; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Emily B Schroeder; Rebecca Hanratty; Brenda L Beaty; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Edward P Havranek; John F Steiner Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-07-31
Authors: Deborah J Cohen; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Leah Gordon; Miguel Marino; Sarah Ono; Leif I Solberg; Benjamin F Crabtree; Kurt C Stange; Melinda Davis; William L Miller; Laura J Damschroder; K John McConnell; John Creswell Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Donna R Shelley; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Sheila Anane; Winfred Y Wu; Keith Goldfeld; Heather T Gold; Sue Kaplan; Carolyn Berry Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 7.327