Literature DB >> 18316754

Performance measurement in the small office practice: challenges and potential solutions.

Bruce E Landon1, Sharon-Lise T Normand.   

Abstract

Great strides have been made in the creation of programs aimed at improving the safety and quality of health care in the United States, including measurement systems and corresponding standards in the ambulatory setting that are used for public reporting or pay-for-performance. The diversity of physician practices in the United States makes measurement challenging. In many parts of the country, substantial proportions of both primary care and specialist physicians continue to practice in solo or small group practices. This article reviews the practice landscape in the United States; describes performance measurement challenges in small practice settings, including financial and staffing implications; discusses statistical issues that affect assessment of practice quality; and describes potential solutions to the issues raised. Challenges of performance measurement in small practice settings include lack of infrastructure and health information technology, lack of support staff, and increased burden. These issues are compounded by the difficulty of assessing a smaller number of patients spread over multiple payers. To overcome some of these challenges, design and measure selection recommendations for the performance assessment system are presented and practice-level and health plan-level interventions are suggested that might facilitate the inclusion of small practice settings in performance assessment programs. Because a high proportion of U.S. physicians practice in small settings, programs and policies based on physician performance measurement should incorporate features that facilitate the inclusion of these physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316754     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  21 in total

1.  Symposium on malaria research.

Authors:  J Lachmajer
Journal:  Bull Inst Marit Trop Med Gdynia       Date:  1975

2.  The Cost to Successfully Apply for Level 3 Medical Home Recognition.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Halladay; Kathleen Mottus; Kristin Reiter; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue; Wilson M Gabbard; Kimberly Gush
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Clinician Perspectives on the Benefits of Practice Facilitation for Small Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Erin S Rogers; Allison M Cuthel; Carolyn A Berry; Sue A Kaplan; Donna R Shelley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Does it get easier to use an EHR? Report from an urban regional extension center.

Authors:  Mandy Smith Ryan; Sarah C Shih; Chloe H Winther; Jason J Wang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Physicians' perceptions of autonomy across practice types: Is autonomy in solo practice a myth?

Authors:  Katherine Y Lin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  A controlled trial of dissemination and implementation of a cardiovascular risk reduction strategy in small primary care practices.

Authors:  Samuel Cykert; Thomas C Keyserling; Michael Pignone; Darren DeWalt; Bryan J Weiner; Justin G Trogdon; Thomas Wroth; Jacqueline Halladay; Monique Mackey; Jason Fine; Jung In Kim; Crystal Cene
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The comprehensive care project: measuring physician performance in ambulatory practice.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Weifeng Weng; Gerald K Arnold; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sharon-Lise Normand; Sheldon Greenfield; Sarah Hood; Rebecca S Lipner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Improving the effectiveness of health care innovation implementation: middle managers as change agents.

Authors:  Sarah A Birken; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Bryan J Weiner; Marshall H Chin; Cynthia T Schaefer
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.929

9.  The health disparities cancer collaborative: a case study of practice registry measurement in a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  David A Haggstrom; Steven B Clauser; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Developing a policy-relevant research agenda for the patient-centered medical home: a focus on outcomes.

Authors:  Diane R Rittenhouse; David H Thom; Julie A Schmittdiel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.