OBJECTIVE: The newly proposed National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer disease (AD) suggest a combination of clinical features and biomarker measures, but their performance in the community is not known. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) is a population-based longitudinal study of nondemented subjects in Olmsted County, Minnesota. A sample of 154 MCI subjects from the MCSA was compared to a sample of 58 amnestic MCI subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 1 (ADNI-1) to assess the applicability of the criteria in both settings and to assess their outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen percent of MCSA and 16% of ADNI-1 of subjects were biomarker negative. In addition, 14% of MCSA and 12% of ADNI-1 subjects had evidence for amyloid deposition only, whereas 43% of MCSA and 55% of ADNI-1 subjects had evidence for amyloid deposition plus neurodegeneration (magnetic resonance imaging atrophy, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography hypometabolism, or both). However, a considerable number of subjects had biomarkers inconsistent with the proposed AD model; for example, 29% of MCSA subjects and 17% of ADNI-1 subjects had evidence for neurodegeneration without amyloid deposition. These subjects may not be on an AD pathway. Neurodegeneration appears to be a key factor in predicting progression relative to amyloid deposition alone. INTERPRETATION: The NIA-AA criteria apply to most MCI subjects in both the community and clinical trials settings; however, a sizeable proportion of subjects had conflicting biomarkers, which may be very important and need to be explored.
OBJECTIVE: The newly proposed National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer disease (AD) suggest a combination of clinical features and biomarker measures, but their performance in the community is not known. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) is a population-based longitudinal study of nondemented subjects in Olmsted County, Minnesota. A sample of 154 MCI subjects from the MCSA was compared to a sample of 58 amnestic MCI subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 1 (ADNI-1) to assess the applicability of the criteria in both settings and to assess their outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen percent of MCSA and 16% of ADNI-1 of subjects were biomarker negative. In addition, 14% of MCSA and 12% of ADNI-1 subjects had evidence for amyloid deposition only, whereas 43% of MCSA and 55% of ADNI-1 subjects had evidence for amyloid deposition plus neurodegeneration (magnetic resonance imaging atrophy, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography hypometabolism, or both). However, a considerable number of subjects had biomarkers inconsistent with the proposed AD model; for example, 29% of MCSA subjects and 17% of ADNI-1 subjects had evidence for neurodegeneration without amyloid deposition. These subjects may not be on an AD pathway. Neurodegeneration appears to be a key factor in predicting progression relative to amyloid deposition alone. INTERPRETATION: The NIA-AA criteria apply to most MCI subjects in both the community and clinical trials settings; however, a sizeable proportion of subjects had conflicting biomarkers, which may be very important and need to be explored.
Authors: P Vemuri; H J Wiste; S D Weigand; L M Shaw; J Q Trojanowski; M W Weiner; D S Knopman; R C Petersen; C R Jack Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S M Landau; D Harvey; C M Madison; E M Reiman; N L Foster; P S Aisen; R C Petersen; L M Shaw; J Q Trojanowski; C R Jack; M W Weiner; W J Jagust Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Howard J Cabral; Fabio Settecase; Christopher P Hess; William P Dillon; Christine M Glastonbury; Michael W Weiner; Nicholas J Schmansky; David H Salat; Bruce Fischl Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ronald C Petersen; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Yonas E Geda; Robert J Ivnik; Glenn E Smith; Clifford R Jack Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Niklas Mattsson; Henrik Zetterberg; Oskar Hansson; Niels Andreasen; Lucilla Parnetti; Michael Jonsson; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Wiesje M van der Flier; Marinus A Blankenstein; Michael Ewers; Kenneth Rich; Elmar Kaiser; Marcel Verbeek; Magda Tsolaki; Ezra Mulugeta; Erik Rosén; Dag Aarsland; Pieter Jelle Visser; Johannes Schröder; Jan Marcusson; Mony de Leon; Harald Hampel; Philip Scheltens; Tuula Pirttilä; Anders Wallin; Maria Eriksdotter Jönhagen; Lennart Minthon; Bengt Winblad; Kaj Blennow Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: W J Jagust; S M Landau; L M Shaw; J Q Trojanowski; R A Koeppe; E M Reiman; N L Foster; R C Petersen; M W Weiner; J C Price; C A Mathis Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kelvin K Leung; Josephine Barnes; Gerard R Ridgway; Jonathan W Bartlett; Matthew J Clarkson; Kate Macdonald; Norbert Schuff; Nick C Fox; Sebastien Ourselin Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Prashanthi Vemuri; Stephen D Weigand; Matthew L Senjem; Guang Zeng; Matt A Bernstein; Jeffrey L Gunter; Vernon S Pankratz; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; David S Knopman Journal: Brain Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Laura E M Wisse; Nirali Butala; Sandhitsu R Das; Christos Davatzikos; Bradford C Dickerson; Sanjeev N Vaishnavi; Paul A Yushkevich; David A Wolk Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Miguel Ángel Araque Caballero; Matthias Brendel; Andreas Delker; Jinyi Ren; Axel Rominger; Peter Bartenstein; Martin Dichgans; Michael W Weiner; Michael Ewers Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: E Cavedo; S Lista; Z Khachaturian; P Aisen; P Amouyel; K Herholz; C R Jack; R Sperling; J Cummings; K Blennow; S O'Bryant; G B Frisoni; A Khachaturian; M Kivipelto; W Klunk; K Broich; S Andrieu; M Thiebaut de Schotten; J-F Mangin; A A Lammertsma; K Johnson; S Teipel; A Drzezga; A Bokde; O Colliot; H Bakardjian; H Zetterberg; B Dubois; B Vellas; L S Schneider; H Hampel Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014-12
Authors: Emily C Edmonds; Lisa Delano-Wood; Douglas R Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Renée DeVivo; Lauren Zajac; Asim Mian; Anna Cervantes-Arslanian; Eric Steinberg; Michael L Alosco; Jesse Mez; Robert Stern; Ronald Killany Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Emily C Edmonds; Lisa Delano-Wood; Lindsay R Clark; Amy J Jak; Daniel A Nation; Carrie R McDonald; David J Libon; Rhoda Au; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: David A Wolk; Carl Sadowsky; Beth Safirstein; Juha O Rinne; Ranjan Duara; Richard Perry; Marc Agronin; Jose Gamez; Jiong Shi; Adrian Ivanoiu; Lennart Minthon; Zuzana Walker; Steen Hasselbalch; Clive Holmes; Marwan Sabbagh; Marilyn Albert; Adam Fleisher; Paul Loughlin; Eric Triau; Kirk Frey; Peter Høgh; Andrea Bozoki; Roger Bullock; Eric Salmon; Gillian Farrar; Christopher J Buckley; Michelle Zanette; Paul F Sherwin; Andrea Cherubini; Fraser Inglis Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 18.302