Literature DB >> 31130145

Differentiating Between Healthy Control Participants and Those with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Volumetric MRI Data.

Renée DeVivo1,2, Lauren Zajac1,2, Asim Mian3, Anna Cervantes-Arslanian4, Eric Steinberg5, Michael L Alosco5,6, Jesse Mez5,6, Robert Stern1,4,5,6, Ronald Killany1,2,5,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether volumetric measures of the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and other cortical measures can differentiate between cognitively normal individuals and subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
METHOD: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 46 cognitively normal subjects and 50 subjects with MCI as part of the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Center research registry and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were used in this cross-sectional study. Cortical, subcortical, and hippocampal subfield volumes were generated from each subject's MRI data using FreeSurfer v6.0. Nominal logistic regression models containing these variables were used to identify subjects as control or MCI.
RESULTS: A model containing regions of interest (superior temporal cortex, caudal anterior cingulate, pars opercularis, subiculum, precentral cortex, caudal middle frontal cortex, rostral middle frontal cortex, pars orbitalis, middle temporal cortex, insula, banks of the superior temporal sulcus, parasubiculum, paracentral lobule) fit the data best (R2 = .7310, whole model test chi-square = 97.16, p < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI data correctly classified most subjects using measures of selected medial temporal lobe structures in combination with those from other cortical areas, yielding an overall classification accuracy of 93.75%. These findings support the notion that, while volumes of medial temporal lobe regions differ between cognitively normal and MCI subjects, differences that can be used to distinguish between these two populations are present elsewhere in the brain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrophy; Entorhinal cortex; Healthy aging; Hippocampus; Logistic models; Neuroimaging

Year:  2019        PMID: 31130145      PMCID: PMC6995275          DOI: 10.1017/S135561771900047X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  34 in total

1.  Specific hippocampal volume reductions in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  A Convit; M J De Leon; C Tarshish; S De Santi; W Tsui; H Rusinek; A George
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Baseline and longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, and their use in prediction of short-term conversion to AD: results from ADNI.

Authors:  Chandan Misra; Yong Fan; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Jean C Augustinack; Khoa Nguyen; Christopher M Player; Allison Player; Michelle Wright; Nicole Roy; Matthew P Frosch; Ann C McKee; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce Fischl; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Usefulness of MRI measures of entorhinal cortex versus hippocampus in AD.

Authors:  Y Xu; C R Jack; P C O'Brien; E Kokmen; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; B F Boeve; R G Tangalos; R C Petersen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Volumes of lateral temporal and parietal structures distinguish between healthy aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jürgen Hänggi; Johannes Streffer; Lutz Jäncke; Christoph Hock
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.472

6.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  A T Du; N Schuff; D Amend; M P Laakso; Y Y Hsu; W J Jagust; K Yaffe; J H Kramer; B Reed; D Norman; H C Chui; M W Weiner
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Multivariate analysis of MRI data for Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls.

Authors:  Eric Westman; Andrew Simmons; Yi Zhang; J-Sebastian Muehlboeck; Catherine Tunnard; Yawu Liu; Louis Collins; Alan Evans; Patrizia Mecocci; Bruno Vellas; Magda Tsolaki; Iwona Kłoszewska; Hilkka Soininen; Simon Lovestone; Christian Spenger; Lars-Olof Wahlund
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Use of structural magnetic resonance imaging to predict who will get Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  R J Killiany; T Gomez-Isla; M Moss; R Kikinis; T Sandor; F Jolesz; R Tanzi; K Jones; B T Hyman; M S Albert
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Automated Hippocampal Subfield Measures as Predictors of Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease in Two Independent Cohorts.

Authors:  Wasim Khan; Eric Westman; Nigel Jones; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Patrizia Mecocci; Bruno Vellas; Magda Tsolaki; Iwona Kłoszewska; Hilkka Soininen; Christian Spenger; Simon Lovestone; J-Sebastian Muehlboeck; Andrew Simmons
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  4 in total

1.  Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease: Detecting Asymmetries with a Return Random Walk Link Predictor.

Authors:  Manuel Curado; Francisco Escolano; Miguel A Lozano; Edwin R Hancock
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.524

2.  Quantitative Analysis of Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Baohui Lou; Yuwei Jiang; Chunmei Li; Pu-Yeh Wu; Shuhua Li; Bin Qin; Haibo Chen; Rui Wang; Bing Wu; Min Chen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Dynamics and Concordance Abnormalities Among Indices of Intrinsic Brain Activity in Individuals With Subjective Cognitive Decline: A Temporal Dynamics Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  Yiwen Yang; Xinyi Zha; Xiaodong Zhang; Jun Ke; Su Hu; Ximing Wang; Yunyan Su; Chunhong Hu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 4.  FreeSurfer-based segmentation of hippocampal subfields: A review of methods and applications, with a novel quality control procedure for ENIGMA studies and other collaborative efforts.

Authors:  Philipp G Sämann; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Boris Gutman; Dominik Grotegerd; Ramona Leenings; Claas Flint; Udo Dannlowski; Emily K Clarke-Rubright; Rajendra A Morey; Theo G M van Erp; Christopher D Whelan; Laura K M Han; Laura S van Velzen; Bo Cao; Jean C Augustinack; Paul M Thompson; Neda Jahanshad; Lianne Schmaal
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 5.038

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.