OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between baseline MRI and CSF biomarkers and subsequent change in continuous measures of cognitive and functional abilities in cognitively normal (CN) subjects and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD) and to examine the ability of these biomarkers to predict time to conversion from aMCI to AD. METHODS: Data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, which consists of CN, aMCI, and AD cohorts with both CSF and MRI, were used. Baseline CSF (t-tau, Abeta(1-42), and p-tau(181P)) and MRI scans were obtained in 399 subjects (109 CN, 192 aMCI, 98 AD). Structural Abnormality Index (STAND) scores, which reflect the degree of AD-like features in MRI, were computed for each subject. RESULTS: Change on continuous measures of cognitive and functional performance was modeled as average Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes and Mini-Mental State Examination scores over a 2-year period. STAND was a better predictor of subsequent cognitive/functional change than CSF biomarkers. Single-predictor Cox proportional hazard models for time to conversion from aMCI to AD showed that STAND and log (t-tau/Abeta(1-42)) were both predictive of future conversion. The age-adjusted hazard ratio for an interquartile change (95% confidence interval) of STAND was 2.6 (1.7, 4.2) and log (t-tau/Abeta(1-42)) was 2.0 (1.1, 3.4). Both MRI and CSF provided information about future cognitive change even after adjusting for baseline cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and CSF provide complimentary predictive information about time to conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease and combination of the 2 provides better prediction than either source alone. However, we found that MRI was a slightly better predictor of future clinical/functional decline than the CSF biomarkers tested.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between baseline MRI and CSF biomarkers and subsequent change in continuous measures of cognitive and functional abilities in cognitively normal (CN) subjects and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD) and to examine the ability of these biomarkers to predict time to conversion from aMCI to AD. METHODS: Data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, which consists of CN, aMCI, and AD cohorts with both CSF and MRI, were used. Baseline CSF (t-tau, Abeta(1-42), and p-tau(181P)) and MRI scans were obtained in 399 subjects (109 CN, 192 aMCI, 98 AD). Structural Abnormality Index (STAND) scores, which reflect the degree of AD-like features in MRI, were computed for each subject. RESULTS: Change on continuous measures of cognitive and functional performance was modeled as average Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes and Mini-Mental State Examination scores over a 2-year period. STAND was a better predictor of subsequent cognitive/functional change than CSF biomarkers. Single-predictor Cox proportional hazard models for time to conversion from aMCI to AD showed that STAND and log (t-tau/Abeta(1-42)) were both predictive of future conversion. The age-adjusted hazard ratio for an interquartile change (95% confidence interval) of STAND was 2.6 (1.7, 4.2) and log (t-tau/Abeta(1-42)) was 2.0 (1.1, 3.4). Both MRI and CSF provided information about future cognitive change even after adjusting for baseline cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and CSF provide complimentary predictive information about time to conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease and combination of the 2 provides better prediction than either source alone. However, we found that MRI was a slightly better predictor of future clinical/functional decline than the CSF biomarkers tested.
Authors: N Andreasen; J Gottfries; E Vanmechelen; H Vanderstichele; P Davidson; K Blennow; L Rosengren; K Blennow Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: C R Jack; D W Dickson; J E Parisi; Y C Xu; R H Cha; P C O'Brien; S D Edland; G E Smith; B F Boeve; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen; R C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M J de Leon; S Segal; C Y Tarshish; S DeSanti; R Zinkowski; P D Mehta; A Convit; C Caraos; H Rusinek; W Tsui; L A Saint Louis; J DeBernardis; D Kerkman; F Qadri; A Gary; P Lesbre; T Wisniewski; J Poirier; P Davies Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2002-11-29 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: M Bobinski; M J de Leon; J Wegiel; S Desanti; A Convit; L A Saint Louis; H Rusinek; H M Wisniewski Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2000 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: L C Silbert; J F Quinn; M M Moore; E Corbridge; M J Ball; G Murdoch; G Sexton; J A Kaye Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-08-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stefan Klöppel; Cynthia M Stonnington; Josephine Barnes; Frederick Chen; Carlton Chu; Catriona D Good; Irina Mader; L Anne Mitchell; Ameet C Patel; Catherine C Roberts; Nick C Fox; Clifford R Jack; John Ashburner; Richard S J Frackowiak Journal: Brain Date: 2008-10-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Matt A Bernstein; Bret J Borowski; Jeffrey L Gunter; Nick C Fox; Paul M Thompson; Norbert Schuff; Gunnar Krueger; Ronald J Killiany; Charles S Decarli; Anders M Dale; Owen W Carmichael; Duygu Tosun; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen; Clifford R Jack; William J Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie Shaw; Andrew J Saykin; John C Morris; Nigel Cairns; Laurel A Beckett; Arthur Toga; Robert Green; Sarah Walter; Holly Soares; Peter Snyder; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Patricia E Cole; Mark Schmidt Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: John Q Trojanowski; Hugo Vandeerstichele; Magdalena Korecka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Z Potter; Michael W Weiner; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Arthur W Toga; Virginia M-Y Lee; Leslie M Shaw Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Kenichi Oishi; Susumu Mori; Sarah Tighe; Michael I Miller; Can Ceritoglu; Timothy Brown; Marilyn Albert; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Enchi Liu; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Mark E Schmidt; Leslie Shaw; Judith A Siuciak; Holly Soares; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Joshua D Grill; Lijie Di; Po H Lu; Cathy Lee; John Ringman; Liana G Apostolova; Nicole Chow; Omid Kohannim; Jeffrey L Cummings; Paul M Thompson; David Elashoff Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 4.673