Literature DB >> 23685949

Spatial resolution characterization of differential phase contrast CT systems via modulation transfer function (MTF) measurements.

Ke Li1, Joseph Zambelli, Nicholas Bevins, Yongshuai Ge, Guang-Hong Chen.   

Abstract

By adding a Talbot-Lau interferometer to a conventional x-ray absorption computed tomography (CT) imaging system, both differential phase contrast (DPC) signal and absorption contrast signal can be simultaneously measured from the same set of CT measurements. The imaging performance of such multi-contrast x-ray CT imaging systems can be characterized with standard metrics such as noise variance, noise power spectrum, contrast-to-noise ratio, modulation transfer function (MTF), and task-based detectability index. Among these metrics, the measurement of the MTF can be challenging in DPC-CT systems due to several confounding factors such as phase wrapping and the difficulty of using fine wires as probes. To address these technical challenges, this paper discusses a viable and reliable method to experimentally measure the MTF of DPC-CT. It has been found that the spatial resolution of DPC-CT is degraded, when compared to that of the corresponding absorption CT, due to the presence of a source grating G0 in the Talbot-Lau interferometer. An effective MTF was introduced and experimentally estimated to describe the impact of the Talbot-Lau interferometer on the system MTF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685949      PMCID: PMC3746757          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/12/4119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Multicontrast x-ray computed tomography imaging using Talbot-Lau interferometry without phase stepping.

Authors:  Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Ke Li; Zhihua Qi; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Radiation dose efficiency comparison between differential phase contrast CT and conventional absorption CT.

Authors:  Joseph Zambelli; Nicholas Bevins; Zhihua Qi; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Analytical evaluation of the signal and noise propagation in x-ray differential phase-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Rainer Raupach; Thomas G Flohr
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT--noise power spectrum NPS(k).

Authors:  Xiangyang Tang; Yi Yang; Shaojie Tang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Fundamental relationship between the noise properties of grating-based differential phase contrast CT and absorption CT: theoretical framework using a cascaded system model and experimental validation.

Authors:  Ke Li; Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner.

Authors:  C J Bischof; J C Ehrhardt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography.

Authors:  E L Nickoloff; R Riley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).

Authors:  Xiangyang Tang; Yi Yang; Shaojie Tang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Grating-based phase contrast tomosynthesis imaging: proof-of-concept experimental studies.

Authors:  Ke Li; Yongshuai Ge; John Garrett; Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.

Authors:  Ke Li; John Garrett; Yongshuai Ge; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Experimental Realisation of High-sensitivity Laboratory X-ray Grating-based Phase-contrast Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Lorenz Birnbacher; Marian Willner; Astrid Velroyen; Mathias Marschner; Alexander Hipp; Jan Meiser; Frieder Koch; Tobias Schröter; Danays Kunka; Jürgen Mohr; Franz Pfeiffer; Julia Herzen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.