Literature DB >> 23685743

Sex differences in the effectiveness of early coronary computed tomographic angiography compared with standard emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the rule-out myocardial infarction with Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT)-II Trial.

Quynh A Truong1, Douglas Hayden, Pamela K Woodard, Ruth Kirby, Eric T Chou, John T Nagurney, Stephen D Wiviott, Jerome L Fleg, David A Schoenfeld, James E Udelson, Udo Hoffmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluate sex-based differences in the effectiveness of early cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and standard emergency department (ED) evaluation in patients with acute chest pain. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In the Rule-Out Myocardial Infarction With Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT)-II multicenter, controlled trial, we randomized 1000 patients (47% women) 40 to 74 years of age with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome to an early CCTA or standard ED evaluation. In this prespecified analysis, women in the CCTA arm had a greater reduction in length of stay, lower hospital admission rates, and lesser increased cumulative radiation dose than men in a comparison of ED strategies (P for interaction ≤0.02). Although women had lower acute coronary syndrome rates than men (3% versus 12%; P<0.0001), sex differences in length of stay persisted after adjustment for baseline differences, including acute coronary syndrome rate (P for interaction <0.03). Length of stay was similar between sexes with normal CCTA findings (P=0.11). There was no missed acute coronary syndrome for either sex. No difference was observed in major adverse cardiac events between sexes and ED strategies (P for interaction =0.39). Women had more normal CCTA examinations than men (58% versus 37%; P<0.0001), less obstructive coronary disease by CCTA (5% versus 17%; P=0.0001), but similar normalcy rates for functional testing (P=0.65). Men in the CCTA arm had the highest rate of invasive coronary angiography (18%), whereas women had comparable low 5% rates regardless of ED strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides data supporting an early CCTA strategy as an attractive option in women presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. The findings may be explained by lower CAD prevalence and severity in women than men. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01084239.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; chest pain; emergency service, hospital; sex; tomography, x-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685743      PMCID: PMC3753028          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

1.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain.

Authors:  Rita F Redberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Evolution of coronary computed tomography radiation dose reduction at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Brian Burns Ghoshhajra; Leif-Christopher Engel; Gyöngyi Petra Major; Alexander Goehler; Tust Techasith; Daniel Verdini; Synho Do; Bob Liu; Xinhua Li; Michiel Sala; Mi Sung Kim; Ron Blankstein; Priyanka Prakash; Manavjot S Sidhu; Erin Corsini; Dahlia Banerji; David Wu; Suhny Abbara; Quynh Truong; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann; Manudeep Kalra
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; Leslee J Shaw; Andrew Arai; Matthew J Budoff; Scott D Flamm; W Gregory Hundley; Thomas H Marwick; Lori Mosca; Ayan R Patel; Miguel A Quinones; Rita F Redberg; Kathryn A Taubert; Allen J Taylor; Gregory S Thomas; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The optimal dose reduction level using iterative reconstruction with prospective ECG-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MDCT.

Authors:  Yang Hou; Shu Xu; Wenli Guo; Mani Vembar; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

Authors:  W Bob Meijboom; Matthijs F L Meijs; Joanne D Schuijf; Maarten J Cramer; Nico R Mollet; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Koen Nieman; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Gabija Pundziute; Annick C Weustink; Alexander M de Vos; Francesca Pugliese; Benno Rensing; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax; Mathias Prokop; Pieter A Doevendans; Myriam G M Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Submillisievert median radiation dose for coronary angiography with a second-generation 320-detector row CT scanner in 107 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Marcus Y Chen; Sujata M Shanbhag; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT.

Authors:  Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Milena J Henzlova; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; David Dowe; James G Jollis; Michael Gitter; John Sutherland; Edward Halamert; Markus Scherer; Raye Bellinger; Arthur Martin; Robert Benton; Augustin Delago; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Functional and CT Angiography Testing in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Neha J Pagidipati; Kshipra Hemal; Adrian Coles; Daniel B Mark; Rowena J Dolor; Patricia A Pellikka; Udo Hoffmann; Sheldon E Litwin; James Udelson; Melissa A Daubert; Svati H Shah; Beth Martinez; Kerry L Lee; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Li Qi; Jing Wang; Chun Xiang Tang; Chang Sheng Zhou; Xue Man Ji; James V Spearman; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department: Contrasting Evidence from Registries and Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Utility of dual-source computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy-DIRECT study.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Jackie Szymonifka; Michael H Picard; Wai-Ee Thai; Bryan Wai; Jim W Cheung; E Kevin Heist; Udo Hoffmann; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Mariana Garcia; Sharon L Mulvagh; C Noel Bairey Merz; Julie E Buring; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Age- and sex-based resource utilisation and costs in patients with acute chest pain undergoing cardiac CT angiography: pooled evidence from ROMICAT II and ACRIN-PA trials.

Authors:  Fabian Bamberg; Thomas Mayrhofer; Maros Ferencik; Daniel O Bittner; Travis R Hallett; Sumbal Janjua; Christopher L Schlett; John T Nagurney; James E Udelson; Quynh A Truong; Pamela K Woodard; Judd E Hollander; Harold Litt; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  State-of-the-Art Updates on Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessing Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Joshua Schulman-Marcus; Ibrahim Danad; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Enhancing Risk Stratification and Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease in Women.

Authors:  Sara Karnib; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 9.  Cardiac CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  The diagnosis of coronary plaque stability by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Feng-Xiang Song; Jun Zhou; Jian-Jun Zhou; Yu-Xin Shi; Meng-Su Zeng; Zhi-Yong Zhang; Peng Lv; Ruo-Fan Sheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.