Literature DB >> 23685159

The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: methods.

P W Stroman1, C Wheeler-Kingshott, M Bacon, J M Schwab, R Bosma, J Brooks, D Cadotte, T Carlstedt, O Ciccarelli, J Cohen-Adad, A Curt, N Evangelou, M G Fehlings, M Filippi, B J Kelley, S Kollias, A Mackay, C A Porro, S Smith, S M Strittmatter, P Summers, I Tracey.   

Abstract

A first-ever spinal cord imaging meeting was sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust and the Wings for Life Foundation with the aim of identifying the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, the current greatest challenges, and greatest needs for future development. This meeting was attended by a small group of invited experts spanning all aspects of spinal cord imaging from basic research to clinical practice. The greatest current challenges for spinal cord imaging were identified as arising from the imaging environment itself; difficult imaging environment created by the bone surrounding the spinal canal, physiological motion of the cord and adjacent tissues, and small cross-sectional dimensions of the spinal cord, exacerbated by metallic implants often present in injured patients. Challenges were also identified as a result of a lack of "critical mass" of researchers taking on the development of spinal cord imaging, affecting both the rate of progress in the field, and the demand for equipment and software to manufacturers to produce the necessary tools. Here we define the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, discuss the underlying theory and challenges, and present the evidence for the current and potential power of these methods. In two review papers (part I and part II), we propose that the challenges can be overcome with advances in methods, improving availability and effectiveness of methods, and linking existing researchers to create the necessary scientific and clinical network to advance the rate of progress and impact of the research.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; Human; Imaging; Magnetic resonance; Physiological motion; Positron emission tomography; Spectroscopy; Spinal cord; Susceptibility

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685159      PMCID: PMC4371133          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  133 in total

1.  The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Derek K Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Linear combination of multiecho data: short T2 component selection.

Authors:  Craig K Jones; Qing-San Xiang; Kenneth P Whittall; Alex L MacKay
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Myelin water and T(2) relaxation measurements in the healthy cervical spinal cord at 3.0T: repeatability and changes with age.

Authors:  Erin L MacMillan; Burkhard Mädler; Nicole Fichtner; Marcel F Dvorak; David K B Li; Armin Curt; Alex L MacKay
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  The role(s) of astrocytes and astrocyte activity in neurometabolism, neurovascular coupling, and the production of functional neuroimaging signals.

Authors:  Chase R Figley; Patrick W Stroman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the pediatric spinal cord at 1.5T: preliminary results.

Authors:  F B Mohamed; L N Hunter; N Barakat; C-S J Liu; H Sair; A F Samdani; R R Betz; S H Faro; J Gaughan; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Demyelination and degeneration in the injured human spinal cord detected with diffusion and magnetization transfer MRI.

Authors:  J Cohen-Adad; M-M El Mendili; S Lehéricy; P-F Pradat; S Blancho; S Rossignol; H Benali
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Assessing neuronal metabolism in vivo by modeling imaging measures.

Authors:  Olga Ciccarelli; Ahmed T Toosy; Nicola De Stefano; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; David H Miller; Alan J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  F J Cooke; A M Blamire; D N Manners; P Styles; B Rajagopalan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Metabolic neuroimaging of the cervical spinal cord in patients with compressive myelopathy: a high-resolution positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Kenzo Uchida; Shigeru Kobayashi; Takafumi Yayama; Yasuo Kokubo; Hideaki Nakajima; Michiko Kakuyama; Norihiro Sadato; Tatsuro Tsuchida; Yoshiharu Yonekura; Hisatoshi Baba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-07

10.  Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain.

Authors:  Klaus Schmierer; Francesco Scaravilli; Daniel R Altmann; Gareth J Barker; David H Miller
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  86 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of column-specific degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on diffusion tensor tractography.

Authors:  Jiao-Long Cui; Xiang Li; Tin-Yan Chan; Kin-Cheung Mak; Keith Dip-Kei Luk; Yong Hu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis--diagnostic, prognostic and clinical value.

Authors:  Hugh Kearney; David H Miller; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Injury alters intrinsic functional connectivity within the primate spinal cord.

Authors:  Li Min Chen; Arabinda Mishra; Pai-Feng Yang; Feng Wang; John C Gore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differential fMRI Activation Patterns to Noxious Heat and Tactile Stimuli in the Primate Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Pai-Feng Yang; Feng Wang; Li Min Chen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Automatic Spinal Cord Gray Matter Quantification: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  C Tsagkas; A Horvath; A Altermatt; S Pezold; M Weigel; T Haas; M Amann; L Kappos; T Sprenger; O Bieri; P Cattin; K Parmar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Spatial correspondence of spinal cord white matter tracts using diffusion tensor imaging, fibre tractography, and atlas-based segmentation.

Authors:  Stewart McLachlin; Jason Leung; Vignesh Sivan; Pierre-Olivier Quirion; Phoenix Wilkie; Julien Cohen-Adad; Cari Marisa Whyne; Michael Raymond Hardisty
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Clinically Feasible Microstructural MRI to Quantify Cervical Spinal Cord Tissue Injury Using DTI, MT, and T2*-Weighted Imaging: Assessment of Normative Data and Reliability.

Authors:  A R Martin; B De Leener; J Cohen-Adad; D W Cadotte; S Kalsi-Ryan; S F Lange; L Tetreault; A Nouri; A Crawley; D J Mikulis; H Ginsberg; M G Fehlings
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  A Novel MRI Biomarker of Spinal Cord White Matter Injury: T2*-Weighted White Matter to Gray Matter Signal Intensity Ratio.

Authors:  A R Martin; B De Leener; J Cohen-Adad; D W Cadotte; S Kalsi-Ryan; S F Lange; L Tetreault; A Nouri; A Crawley; D J Mikulis; H Ginsberg; M G Fehlings
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Advancements in Imaging Technology: Do They (or Will They) Equate to Advancements in Our Knowledge of Recovery in Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Charles Hazle; Mark A Hoggarth; Jacob McPherson; Cheryl L Sparks; Kenneth A Weber
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  2D phase-sensitive inversion recovery imaging to measure in vivo spinal cord gray and white matter areas in clinically feasible acquisition times.

Authors:  Nico Papinutto; Regina Schlaeger; Valentina Panara; Eduardo Caverzasi; Sinyeob Ahn; Kevin J Johnson; Alyssa H Zhu; William A Stern; Gerhard Laub; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.