AIM: Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening reduces mortality from prostate cancer, substantial over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment are concerns. Early screening of men for PSA may serve to stratify the male population by risk of future clinical prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Case-control study nested within the Danish 'Diet, Cancer and Health' cohort of 27,179 men aged 50-64 at enrolment. PSA measured in serum collected at cohort entry in 1993-1997 was used to evaluate prostate cancer risk diagnosed up to 14 years after. We identified 911 prostate cancer cases in the Danish Cancer Registry through 31st December 2007 1:1 age-matched with cancer-free controls. Aggressive cancer was defined as ≥ T3 or Gleason score ≥ 7 or N1 or M1. Statistical analyses were based on conditional logistic regression with age as underlying time axis. RESULTS: Total PSA and free-to-total PSA ratio at baseline were strongly associated with prostate cancer risk up to 14 years later. PSA was grouped in quintiles and free-to-total PSA ratio divided in three risk groups. The incidence rate ratio for prostate cancer was 150 (95% confidence interval, 72-310) among men with a total PSA in the highest quintile (> 5.1 ng/ml) compared to the lowest (< 0.80 ng/ml). The risk of aggressive cancer was highly elevated in men with a PSA level in the highest quintile. The results indicate that one-time measurement of PSA could be used in an individualised screening strategy, sparing a large proportion of men from further PSA-based screening.
AIM: Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening reduces mortality from prostate cancer, substantial over-diagnosis and subsequent overtreatment are concerns. Early screening of men for PSA may serve to stratify the male population by risk of future clinical prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Case-control study nested within the Danish 'Diet, Cancer and Health' cohort of 27,179 men aged 50-64 at enrolment. PSA measured in serum collected at cohort entry in 1993-1997 was used to evaluate prostate cancer risk diagnosed up to 14 years after. We identified 911 prostate cancer cases in the Danish Cancer Registry through 31st December 2007 1:1 age-matched with cancer-free controls. Aggressive cancer was defined as ≥ T3 or Gleason score ≥ 7 or N1 or M1. Statistical analyses were based on conditional logistic regression with age as underlying time axis. RESULTS: Total PSA and free-to-total PSA ratio at baseline were strongly associated with prostate cancer risk up to 14 years later. PSA was grouped in quintiles and free-to-total PSA ratio divided in three risk groups. The incidence rate ratio for prostate cancer was 150 (95% confidence interval, 72-310) among men with a total PSA in the highest quintile (> 5.1 ng/ml) compared to the lowest (< 0.80 ng/ml). The risk of aggressive cancer was highly elevated in men with a PSA level in the highest quintile. The results indicate that one-time measurement of PSA could be used in an individualised screening strategy, sparing a large proportion of men from further PSA-based screening.
Authors: Hans Lilja; David Ulmert; Thomas Björk; Charlotte Becker; Angel M Serio; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Andrew J Vickers; Göran Berglund Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Ulmert; Charlotte Becker; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Timo Piironen; Thomas Björk; Jonas Hugosson; Göran Berglund; Hans Lilja Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2005-12-29 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Gabriel P Haas; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Richard F Jones; Vishal Chandan; Angel M Serio; Andrew J Vickers; Mary Jumbelic; Gregory Threatte; Rus Korets; Hans Lilja; Gustavo de la Roza Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-09-25 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Aniko Szabo; Seth Falcon; Jake Wegelin; Dante DiTommaso; Kent Karnofski; Roman Gulati; David F Penson; Eric Feuer Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: H B Carter; J D Pearson; E J Metter; L J Brant; D W Chan; R Andres; J L Fozard; P C Walsh Journal: JAMA Date: 1992 Apr 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Katja Boll; Connie Stripp; Jane Christensen; Gerda Engholm; Kim Overvad Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Gerrit Draisma; Rob Boer; Suzie J Otto; Ingrid W van der Cruijsen; Ronald A M Damhuis; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A K Eriksen; C Kyrø; N Nørskov; A K Bolvig; J Christensen; A Tjønneland; K Overvad; R Landberg; A Olsen Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Lauren Brady; Brian Hayes; Gráinne Sheill; Anne-Marie Baird; Emer Guinan; Bryan Stanfill; Tatjana Vlajnic; Orla Casey; Verena Murphy; John Greene; Emma H Allott; Juliette Hussey; Fidelma Cahill; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Nicola Peat; Lorelei Mucci; Moya Cunningham; Liam Grogan; Thomas Lynch; Rustom P Manecksha; John McCaffrey; Dearbhaile O'Donnell; Orla Sheils; John O'Leary; Sarah Rudman; Ray McDermott; Stephen Finn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Jane M Lange; Angela B Mariotto; Andrew J Vickers; Sigrid V Carlsson; Ruth Etzioni Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506