| Literature DB >> 33338056 |
Lauren Brady1, Brian Hayes2,3, Gráinne Sheill4, Anne-Marie Baird1, Emer Guinan5, Bryan Stanfill6, Tatjana Vlajnic7, Orla Casey8, Verena Murphy8, John Greene1, Emma H Allott1,9, Juliette Hussey4, Fidelma Cahill10, Mieke Van Hemelrijck10, Nicola Peat11, Lorelei Mucci12, Moya Cunningham13, Liam Grogan14, Thomas Lynch15, Rustom P Manecksha15,16, John McCaffrey17, Dearbhaile O'Donnell18, Orla Sheils1, John O'Leary19, Sarah Rudman11, Ray McDermott20, Stephen Finn1,8,19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) represent a morphologically distinct subset of cancer cells, which aid the metastatic spread. The ExPeCT trial aimed to examine the effectiveness of a structured exercise programme in modulating levels of CTCs and platelet cloaking in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33338056 PMCID: PMC7748139 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flowchart of ExPeCT participant involvement.
ExPeCT participant clinical and demographic characteristics at baseline.
| Control (n = 31) | Exercise (n = 30) | |
|---|---|---|
| 69.9 (7.5) | 69.8 (7.0) | |
| | 3 (9.7) | 8 (26.7) |
| | 14 (45.2) | 11 (36.7) |
| | 14 (45.2) | 11 (36.7) |
| 104.1 (11.7) | 100.5 (14.6) | |
| 126.1 (17.1) | 131.9 (14.1) | |
| 6.3 (5.2–10.1) | 6.7 (5.1–8.4) | |
| 11.5 (7.0–48.0) | 26.5 (8.0–63.0) | |
| | 4 (14.3) | 3 (12.0) |
| | 9 (32.1) | 11 (44.0) |
| | 15 (53.6) | 11 (44.0) |
| | 3 | 5 |
| 0.8 (0.1–10.00) | 1.9 (0.2–11.1) |
Fig 2MGG morphological staining of representative ExPeCT filters.
A) and B) arrows depict large groups of putative CTCs (CTC clusters) and filter pore, C) arrows indicate a group of four putative CTCs, D) arrows illustrate multiple CTCs without cytoplasm attached, E) and F) arrows depict suggested platelet cloaking of CTCs, G) arrows represent dispersed single platelets on a filter and H) arrows detail inflammatory cells present in a separate plane of focus. All images were taken using a 20x or 40x objective lens, filters pores measure 7.5 μm in diameter. MGG–May Grunwald Giemsa, CTC–circulating tumour cell.
Fig 3Average CTC count in 3 mL blood over time, exercise vs. control, at Irish and London sites.
Location is demonstrated separately as there is a statistically significant difference between the sites. α—significant decrease in CTC number in exercise and control groups between T0 and T3, Irish cohort (p = 0.00); β–significant decrease in CTC number in exercise and control groups between T0 and T6, Irish cohort (p = 0.00); δ—significant decrease in CTC number in exercise and control groups between T0 and T6, London cohort (p = 0.00); λ—significant decrease in CTC number in exercise and control groups between T3 and T6, London cohort (p = 0.00); σ—significant decrease in CTC number in exercise and control groups between T0 and T6, London cohort (p = 0.00). Data graphed as mean ± SD. Exercise–Ireland n = 13, London n = 17 T0; Ireland n = 13, London n = 12 T3; Ireland n = 13, London n = 10 T6; Control–Ireland n = 14, London n = 17 T0; Ireland n = 13, London n = 15 T3; Ireland n = 12, London n = 15 T6. CTC–circulating tumour cell, T0 –baseline, T3 –three months, T6 six months, SD–standard deviation.
Correlation between clinical variables and CTCs, clinical variables and platelet cloaking, and clinical variables and CTC clusters.
| Estimate | SD | z_value | p_value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 0.97 | 1.52 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
| -1.11 | 1.23 | -0.91 | 0.36 | |
| -0.50 | 1.35 | -0.37 | 0.71 | |
| 6.25 | 1.06 | 5.90 | ||
| -1.03 | 1.18 | -0.87 | 0.38 | |
| 1.10 | 1.45 | 0.76 | 0.45 | |
| 0.34 | 0.29 | 1.16 | 0.25 | |
| -0.08 | 0.32 | -0.26 | 0.79 | |
| -0.24 | 0.23 | -1.02 | 0.31 | |
| -0.31 | 0.35 | -0.89 | 0.37 | |
| -0.56 | 0.56 | -1.02 | 0.31 | |
| 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.76 | |
| 0.18 | 0.30 | 0.59 | 0.56 | |
| -0.36 | 0.29 | -1.23 | 0.22 | |
| -0.34 | 0.28 | -1.20 | 0.23 | |
| -0.42 | 0.30 | -1.40 | 0.16 | |
| -0.14 | 0.30 | -0.46 | 0.65 | |
| -0.22 | 0.36 | -0.60 | 0.55 | |
| 1.58 | 0.77 | 2.06 | ||
| -0.44 | 0.29 | -1.55 | 0.12 | |
Statistical analyses included a generalized mixed linear model (CTCs) and logistic regression (platelet cloaking and CTC clusters). Bonferonni corrected p-value threshold of 0.05.
BMI body mass index, Hb hemoglobin, PSA prostate specific antigen, SD standard deviation, WC waist circumference, WCC white cell count.
Correlation between BMI and clinical variables.
| Variable | Mean | SD | Regression Parameter (ƴ) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.63 | 6.64 | 2.75 | 0.51 | |
| 175.61 | 8.55 | 4.13 | 0.25 | |
| 128.78 | 11.41 | 0.40 | 0.93 | |
| 7.64 | 3.07 | 0.56 | 0.90 | |
| 18.49 | 32.13 | -3.46 | 0.35 | |
| 7.64 | 3.07 | 0.56 | 0.90 | |
| 89.39 | 12.01 | 0.83 | 0.72 | |
| 167.81 | 25.55 | -2.44 | 0.29 | |
| 129.04 | 16.80 | -1.38 | 0.56 | |
| 7.76 | 5.33 | 10.63 | ||
| 48.42 | 210.78 | -2.12 | 0.36 | |
| 105.43 | 11.26 | 2.62 | 0.26 | |
Linear regression model. Bonferonni corrected p-value threshold of 0.05.
BMI body mass index, Hb hemoglobin, PSA prostate specific antigen, SD standard deviation, WC waist circumference, WCC white cell count.