Literature DB >> 23684486

Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position: 25-years experience.

Jessica Forcillo1, Michel Pellerin, Louis P Perrault, Raymond Cartier, Denis Bouchard, Philippe Demers, Michel Carrier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve was designed to minimize structural valve deterioration. Excellent durability and low incidence of valve-related complications have been reported. The objective of the present study was to analyze clinical results after 25 years of experience with this valve implanted in the aortic position. The effect of patient age at the time of surgery was also evaluated.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 2,405 patients from November 1981 to March 2011. Primary outcomes of interest were survival and freedom from major adverse effects such as thromboembolic, endocarditis, and reoperation.
RESULTS: Sixty percent were male, with a mean age of 71 ± 9 years old. Actuarial survival rates including early deaths averaged 78% ± 2%, 55% ± 2%, and 16 % ± 2% after 5, 10, and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. The freedom rate of valve reoperation for prosthesis dysfunction and all other causes averaged 98 % ± 0.2%, 96% ± 1%, and 67% ± 4% at 5, 10, and 20 years. Patients younger than 60 years of age had a 15-year survival averaging 54% ± 5% compared with patients aged between 60 and 70 years of age averaging 46% ± 3% and with patients older than 70 years of age averaging 28% ± 3% (p = 0.001). Survival at 5, 10, and 20 years for patients who had concomitant CABG [coronary artery bypass grafting] were 78% ± 1%, 55% ± 2%, and 9% ± 3% compared with no concomitant CABG (84% ± 1%, 62% ± 2%, and 22% ± 3% (p < 0.001)).
CONCLUSIONS: Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve implantation in the aortic position is secure and durable. The effects of age influence reoperation rate and survival as well as a concomitant coronary artery bypass procedure.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  35

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23684486     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  39 in total

1.  Can the Results of Aortic Valve Repair Equal the Results of a Biologic Aortic Valve Replacement?

Authors:  Mohamad Bashir; Aung Oo; Ruggero De Paulis; Michael A Borger; Gebrine El Khoury; Joseph Bavaria; John A Elefteraides
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2014-02-01

2.  Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Johnston; Edward G Soltesz; Nakul Vakil; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eric E Roselli; Joseph F Sabik; Nicholas G Smedira; Lars G Svensson; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Early structural degeneration of Mitroflow aortic valve: another issue in addition to the mismatch?

Authors:  Giovanni Ruvolo; Calogera Pisano; Carmela Rita Balistreri; Emiliano Maresi; Oreste Fabio Triolo; Vincenzo Argano; Carlo Bassano; Sara Rita Vacirca; Paolo Nardi; Augusto Orlandi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Selection of prosthetic valve and evidence--need for the development of Japan's own guidelines.

Authors:  Akira Sezai; Motomi Shiono
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 5.  Aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 6.  Durability of prostheses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Mani Arsalan; Thomas Walther
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Noninferiority of Shanghai Cingular biotech's bovine pericardial valve preclinical study in juvenile ovine model.

Authors:  Jin-Miao Chen; Yu Ding; Shu-Yang Lu; Sun Pan; Mieradilijiang Abudupataer; Tao Hong; Chun-Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT bioprosthesis series in elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Naritomo Nishioka; Akira Yamada; Kosuke Ujihira; Yutaka Iba; Ryushi Maruyama; Eiichiro Hatta; Yoshihiko Kurimoto; Katsuhiko Nakanishi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-04

Review 9.  Tissue Valve Degeneration and Mechanical Valve Failure.

Authors:  Andrew C W Baldwin; George Tolis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-06-14

10.  Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor.

Authors:  Martin Andreas; Stephanie Wallner; Andreas Habertheuer; Claus Rath; Martin Schauperl; Thomas Binder; Dietrich Beitzke; Raphael Rosenhek; Christian Loewe; Dominik Wiedemann; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.