Literature DB >> 27293835

Noninferiority of Shanghai Cingular biotech's bovine pericardial valve preclinical study in juvenile ovine model.

Jin-Miao Chen1, Yu Ding1, Shu-Yang Lu1, Sun Pan1, Mieradilijiang Abudupataer1, Tao Hong1, Chun-Sheng Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study introduces a newly Chinese domestic-designed/manufactured bovine pericardial valve, the SCBC valve (Shanghai Cingular Biotech Corporation, Shanghai, China), and evaluates its hemodynamic performance and calcification potential compared with the Carpentier-Edwards (CE) Perimount(TM) valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in juvenile sheep for preclinical study.
METHODS: Five SCBC valves in study group and three CE Perimount(TM) valves (6900P with TFX) in control group were implanted in the mitral position of juvenile sheep and followed up for five months. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for hemodynamic measurement was performed ten days, three months and five months postoperatively. Valve calcification was assessed by X-ray after euthanasia. Other collected data included macroscopic examination, blood analysis, microorganism culture and histological assessment.
RESULTS: All sheep in two groups lived to sacrifice without evidence of valvular dysfunction. The SCBC valve had similar hemodynamic performance and susceptibility of calcification compared with the CE Perimount(TM) valve in juvenile ovine model. In all other parameters, the SCBC valve also exhibited no significant difference compared with the CE Perimount(TM) valve.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the SCBC valve can exhibit similar mid-term satisfactory safety and efficacy compared with the CE Perimount(TM) valve in the mitral position of juvenile sheep model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carpentier-Edwards PerimountTM valve; SCBC valve; bovine pericardial valve; noninferiority

Year:  2016        PMID: 27293835      PMCID: PMC4885996          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  19 in total

1.  A new model to test the calcification characteristics of bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Ozaki; Paul Herijgers; Willem Flameng
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.

Authors:  R Scott McClure; Narendren Narayanasamy; Esther Wiegerinck; Stuart Lipsitz; Ann Maloney; John G Byrne; Sary F Aranki; Gregory S Couper; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Factors influencing calcification of cardiac bioprostheses in adolescent sheep.

Authors:  Willem Flameng; Bart Meuris; Jessa Yperman; Geofrey De Visscher; Paul Herijgers; Erik Verbeken
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthetic valve as a valid control in preclinical in vivo ovine studies.

Authors:  Laura Harvey; Richard Bianco; Matthew Lahti; John Carney; Lindsey Zhang; Nicholas Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Long-term results after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve implantation, with attention to the impact of age.

Authors:  Karl F Welke; Yingxing Wu; Gary L Grunkemeier; Aftab Ahmad; Albert Starr
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.676

6.  Mid-term comparative follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon pericardial prostheses.

Authors:  T Le Tourneau; C Savoye; E P McFadden; D Grandmougin; H F Carton; J L Hennequin; A Dubar; G Fayad; H Warembourg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update.

Authors:  Shahbudin H Rahimtoola
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Experimental atrioventricular bioprosthetic valve insertion: a simple and successful technique.

Authors:  I Gallo; R W Frater
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  New engineering treatment of bovine pericardium confers outstanding resistance to calcification in mitral and pulmonary implantations in a juvenile sheep model.

Authors:  Christian P Brizard; Johann Brink; Steven B Horton; Glenn Anthony Edwards; John C Galati; William M L Neethling
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  4 in total

1.  Optimizations of stent and tissue leaflets in a new surgical bovine pericardial valve.

Authors:  Jinmiao Chen; Jun Yang; Li Zhang; Wenrui Ma; Shuyang Lu; Chunsheng Wang; Tao Hong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Commentary: Is a novel bioprosthetic valve durable? Time will tell.

Authors:  Ko Bando
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  One-year outcome with a bovine pericardial valve.

Authors:  Jinmiao Chen; Chen He; Minzhi Lv; Yingqiang Guo; Liang Tao; Tao Hong; Chunsheng Wang
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-04-21

4.  Commentary: It looks good, but will it last?

Authors:  Rachel Eikelboom; Michael H Yamashita
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-05-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.