Literature DB >> 24854483

Effect of red light on the development and quality of mammalian embryos.

Rong Li1, Kamilla Sofie Pedersen, Ying Liu, Hanne Skovsgaard Pedersen, Mette Lægdsmand, Lars Fledelius Rickelt, Michael Kühl, Henrik Callesen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess irradiance and total energy dose from different microscopes during the in-vitro embryonic developmental cycle in mouse and pig and to evaluate its effect on embryonic development and quality in pig.
METHOD: Spectral scalar irradiance (380-1050 nm) was measured by a fiber-optic microsensor in the focal plane of a dissection microscope, an inverted microscope and a time-lapse incubation system. Furthermore, the effect of three different red light levels was tested in the time-lapse system on mouse zygotes for 5 days, and on porcine zona-intact and zona-free parthenogenetically activated (PA) embryos for 6 days.
RESULTS: The time-lapse system used red light centered at 625 nm and with a lower irradiance level as compared to the white light irradiance levels on the dissection and inverted microscopes, which included more energetic radiation <550 nm. Even after 1000 times higher total energy dose of red light exposure in the time-lapse system, no significant difference was found neither in blastocyst development of mouse zygotes nor in blastocyst rates and total cell number of blastocysts of porcine PA embryos.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that red light (625 nm, 0.34 W/m(2)) used in the time-lapse incubation system does not decrease the development and quality of blastocysts in both mouse zygotes and porcine PA embryos (both zona-intact and zona-free).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24854483      PMCID: PMC4096879          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0247-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  26 in total

1.  Developmental kinetics of the first cell cycles of bovine in vitro produced embryos in relation to their in vitro viability and sex.

Authors:  P Holm; N N Shukri; G Vajta; P Booth; C Bendixen; H Callesen
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Assessment of DNA damage in individual hamster embryos by comet assay.

Authors:  M Takahashi; N Saka; H Takahashi; Y Kanai; R M Schultz; A Okano
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.609

3.  Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium.

Authors:  Koji Yoshioka; Chie Suzuki; Atsushi Tanaka; Idris M-K Anas; Shokichi Iwamura
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography.

Authors:  D Payne; S P Flaherty; M F Barry; C D Matthews
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment.

Authors:  F Puissant; M Van Rysselberge; P Barlow; J Deweze; F Leroy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The low temperature preservation of mammalian embryos.

Authors:  I Wilmut
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1972-12

7.  The behaviour of cow blastocyst in vitro: cinematographic and morphometric analysis.

Authors:  A Massip; J Mulnard; P Vanderzwalmen; C Hanzen; F Ectors
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS.

Authors:  Alison Campbell; Simon Fishel; Natalie Bowman; Samantha Duffy; Mark Sedler; Simon Thornton
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Time-lapse cinematographic analysis of hatching of normal and frozen-thawed cow blastocysts.

Authors:  A Massip; J Mulnard
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1980-03

10.  Biological effects of blue light from dental curing units.

Authors:  John C Wataha; Petra E Lockwood; Jill B Lewis; Frederick A Rueggeberg; Regina L W Messer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  7 in total

1.  A comparison of morphokinetic markers predicting blastocyst formation and implantation potential from two large clinical data sets.

Authors:  N Zaninovic; M Nohales; Q Zhan; Z M J de Los Santos; J Sierra; Z Rosenwaks; M Meseguer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  How to Reduce the Potential Harmful Effects of Light on Blastocyst Development during IVF.

Authors:  József Bódis; Krisztina Gödöny; Ákos Várnagy; Kálmán Kovács; Miklós Koppán; Bernadett Nagy; János Erostyák; Róbert Herczeg; Julia Szekeres-Barthó; Attila Gyenesei; Gabor L Kovács
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Correlation between morphokinetic parameters and standard morphological assessment: what can we predict from early embryo development? A time-lapse-based experiment with 2085 blastocysts.

Authors:  Catherine Jacobs; Mariana Nicolielo; Renata Erberelli; Fabiana Mendez; Marina Fanelli; Livia Cremonesi; Beatriz Aiello; Aline R Lorenzon
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-07-14

4.  Comparison of the development of human embryos cultured in either an EmbryoScope or benchtop incubator.

Authors:  R Sciorio; J K Thong; S J Pickering
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Three-dimensional live imaging of bovine embryos by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yasumitsu Masuda; Ryo Hasebe; Yasushi Kuromi; Masayoshi Kobayashi; Misaki Iwamoto; Mitsugu Hishinuma; Tetsuya Ohbayashi; Ryo Nishimura
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  The effect of discrete wavelengths of visible light on the developing murine embryo.

Authors:  Carl A Campugan; Megan Lim; Darren J X Chow; Tiffany C Y Tan; Tong Li; Avishkar A Saini; Antony Orth; Philipp Reineck; Erik P Schartner; Jeremy G Thompson; Kishan Dholakia; Kylie R Dunning
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.357

7.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.