Literature DB >> 23680308

Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.

Adam C Reese1, Patricia Landis, Misop Han, Jonathan I Epstein, H Ballentine Carter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: At our institution the eligibility criteria used to enroll patients in active surveillance are clinical stage T1, prostate specific antigen density less than 0.15 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason score 6 or less, 2 or fewer positive biopsy cores and 50% or less involvement of any biopsy core. We hypothesized that these criteria may be excessively strict, precluding many men from active surveillance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied pathological outcomes in men treated with radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2012 who met 4 or more of the 5 active surveillance criteria. Outcomes included a definition of significant tumor (pathological Gleason 7 or greater, or nonorgan confined). We compared adverse pathology rates between men who met all 5 vs 4 of 5 active surveillance criteria.
RESULTS: Of 8,261 men 1,890 (22.9%) met all active surveillance eligibility criteria and 2,133 (25.8%) met 4. Men with values exceeding prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason criteria were at increased risk for adverse pathological outcomes. Clinical stage greater than T1 was not associated with adverse pathological findings. The risk of significant tumors in men with clinical stage T2 lesions, 3 or fewer positive biopsy cores and less than 60% core involvement was comparable to that of men who met all active surveillance criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate specific antigen density greater than 0.15 ng/ml and biopsy Gleason score 7 or greater are strongly associated with adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy. Our findings suggest that active surveillance criteria should be expanded to include men with clinical stage T2 lesions and a greater number of positive biopsy cores of low grade. Based on these preliminary findings, we are in the process of reassessing active surveillance eligibility criteria using more detailed pathological analysis.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AS; BCR; PSA; PSA density; PSAd; RP; active surveillance; biochemical recurrence; prostate; prostate specific antigen; prostate-specific antigen; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; radical prostatectomy; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23680308     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nima Nassiri; Daniel J Margolis; Shyam Natarajan; Devi S Sharma; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Active surveillance in Canadian men with low-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Octav Cristea; Luke T Lavallée; Joshua Montroy; Andrew Stokl; Sonya Cnossen; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; Franco Momoli; Illias Cagiannos; Christopher Morash; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Characteristics and experiences of patients with localized prostate cancer who left an active surveillance program.

Authors:  Zackary D Berger; Jonathan C Yeh; H Ballentine Carter; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Re: Long-term Follow-up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance?

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Antonio Garufi; Giandomenico Priolo; Michele Pennisi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Validation of Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Saif Elamin; Nikita Rajiv Bhatt; Niall F Davis; Paul Sweeney
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

8.  Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  J P Radtke; T H Kuru; D Bonekamp; M T Freitag; M B Wolf; C D Alt; G Hatiboglu; S Boxler; S Pahernik; W Roth; M C Roethke; H P Schlemmer; M Hohenfellner; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Fusion Biopsy to Detect Progression in Patients with Existing Lesions on Active Surveillance for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas P Frye; Arvin K George; Amichai Kilchevsky; Mahir Maruf; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Michael Kongnyuy; Akhil Muthigi; Hui Han; Howard L Parnes; Maria Merino; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Brad Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply?

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Geoffrey Sonn; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.