Literature DB >> 27190877

Validation of Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer.

Saif Elamin1, Nikita Rajiv Bhatt2, Niall F Davis3, Paul Sweeney4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Considerable Proportion of Prostate Cancer (PCa) patients suitable for Active Surveillance (AS) harbour aggressive disease at surgical histopathology. Identification of truly indolent prostate cancer at diagnosis is difficult. AIM: Of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of current AS protocols in identifying low risk PCa by comparing the histopathology at biopsy and surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all patients who underwent Radical Prostatectomy (RP) between 2008 and 2012. We identified patients who fulfilled inclusion criteria of five different established AS protocols. Histopathology at biopsy was compared with final surgical histopathology to identify upgrading or upstaging of disease. The biochemical recurrence rate in the cohort was also determined.
RESULTS: A total of 59 patients (24%) met criteria of at least one protocol. Sixteen patients (28%) were eligible for AS based on all studied criteria. Overall 24 patients (40.6%) were upgraded in their final histopathology while 12 patients (20%) upstaged from their original TRUS biopsy. Two patients (3%) had PSA failure, both had salvage radiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: There is considerable discrepency in current AS selection criteria which makes it necessary to introduce novel markers to identify indolent disease as a part of AS protocol for PCa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histopathology; Low risk; Upgrading; Upstaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 27190877      PMCID: PMC4866175          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16401.7589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  18 in total

1.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; Timothy A Masterson; Kinjal C Vora; Scott E Eggener; James A Eastham; Bertrand D Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  NICE guidelines on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: is UK practice leading the world?

Authors:  Edward H Streeter; Simon F Brewster
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Classification of prostatic carcinomas.

Authors:  D F Gleason
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

5.  Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment.

Authors:  Mark S Soloway; Cynthia T Soloway; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Kristell Acosta; Bruce Kava; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.

Authors:  Koji Mitsuzuka; Shintaro Narita; Takuya Koie; Yasuhiro Kaiho; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Takahiro Yoneyama; Narihiko Kakoi; Sadafumi Kawamura; Tatsuo Tochigi; Tomonori Habuchi; Chikara Ohyama; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Final outcomes of patients with low-risk prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance but treated surgically.

Authors:  Mark Louie-Johnsun; Mischel Neill; Karien Treurnicht; Michael Jarmulowicz; Christopher Eden
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; M Schnall; J E Tomaszewski; A Wein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Eligibility for active surveillance and pathological outcomes for men undergoing radical prostatectomy in a large, community based cohort.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Janet E Cowan; Peter R Carroll; Benjamin J Davies
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Novel tools to improve patient selection and monitoring on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Hashim U Ahmed; Chris H Bangma; Matthew R Cooperberg; Arnauld Villers; Christopher C Parker
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification of men with low-risk biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer as candidates for active surveillance.

Authors:  Daniel W Lin; E David Crawford; Thomas Keane; Brent Evans; Julia Reid; Saradha Rajamani; Krystal Brown; Alexander Gutin; Jonathan Tward; Peter Scardino; Michael Brawer; Steven Stone; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Identification of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay markers for prediction of disease progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.

Authors:  Katerina Pestova; Adam J Koch; Charles P Quesenberry; Jun Shan; Ying Zhang; Amethyst D Leimpeter; Beth Blondin; Svetlana Sitailo; Lela Buckingham; Jing Du; Huixin Fei; Stephen K Van Den Eeden
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.