Literature DB >> 23020696

Torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets under the effect of bracket width and free wire length.

Y Huang1, L Keilig, A Rahimi, S Reimann, C Bourauel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To numerically investigate the torque capacity of conventional and self-ligating brackets under the effect of varying bracket width and free wire length.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Finite element models of three kinds of orthodontic brackets in the 0.022-inch slot size were investigated: Discovery, Damon 3MX, Speed. Additionally, finite element (FE) models of Speed and Damon brackets were generated with the same width as the Discovery. From the left upper incisor to the right upper canine, four brackets each were modelled. The total wire length at the upper right incisor was kept constant at 12 mm for all brackets types. For the Discovery brackets, the wire length was increased from 12 to 16 mm in 2-mm steps. A torque of 20° was applied to the upper right incisor with 0.46 × 0.64 mm(2) (0.018″ × 0.025″) and 0.48 × 0.64 mm(2) (0.019″ × 0.025″) wires. Wires made of stainless steel, titanium molybdenum and nickel titanium were studied. Torque angle/moment characteristics were recorded.
RESULTS: Wider brackets showed more torque control capability (e.g. Discovery: 10.6 Nmm, Damon: 9.2 Nmm, Speed: 4.0 Nmm for the NiTi wire). Even with the same width as the Discovery bracket, Damon and Speed brackets showed lower torque capability than the Discovery bracket. Increasing the free wire length decreased the torsional stiffness of the wire and thus decreased the torque capability.
CONCLUSION: The results showed that the bracket design has less influence on the torquing moment than other parameters, such as bracket width, free wire length, wire/slot play or misalignment.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23020696     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2012.01553.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  7 in total

1.  Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets : A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Idil Unal; Gencer Huniler; Aynur Aras
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Istabrak Hasan; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Computer-aided finite element model for biomechanical analysis of orthodontic aligners.

Authors:  Tarek M Elshazly; Christoph Bourauel; Mostafa Aldesoki; Ahmed Ghoneima; Moosa Abuzayda; Wael Talaat; Sameh Talaat; Ludger Keilig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets.

Authors:  Iosif Sifakakis; Nikolaos Pandis; Margarita Makou; Theodore Eliades; Christos Katsaros; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Iosif Sifakakis; Ioannis Doulis; Theodore Eliades; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 6.  Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Roshan-Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

7.  Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Paola Gandini; Tommaso Castroflorio; Francesco Garino; Luca Mergati; Krizia D'Anca; Federico Trovati; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.