Literature DB >> 23674164

Current Lynch syndrome tumor screening practices: a survey of genetic counselors.

Stephanie A Cohen1.   

Abstract

An electronic survey of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Cancer Special Interest Group was conducted in July 2011 to assess Lynch syndrome tumor screening programs and identify barriers to implementation. Over half of respondents (52.8 %) reported having a routine Lynch syndrome tumor screening protocol for newly diagnosed colon and/or endometrial cancers, and approximately half of these used a universal approach. There was an increase in the number of those screening over time, especially in the past 3 years. Tumor screening methods varied; 34/53 (64.2 %) started with immunohistochemistry, 11/53 (20.8 %) started with microsatellite instability testing and 8/53 (15.1 %) performed both on newly diagnosed colorectal tumors. Just 21.7 % (23/106) of respondents indicated they have a tumor screening program in place for newly diagnosed endometrial cancers. Written consent is rarely obtained (7.1 %) and the method of how results were returned to the patient was variable among respondents. Prevalent barriers to implementation were concern about cost, bringing key players together and convincing medical staff of the necessity. Use of Lynch syndrome tumor screening is in clinical practice, but protocols vary widely. This survey provides a glimpse of current practices and common barriers, and identifies the need for tumor screening algorithms with outcomes data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23674164     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9603-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  59 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of molecular screening for Lynch syndrome in patients with endometrial cancer ≤ 70 years.

Authors:  Celine H M Leenen; Margot G F van Lier; Helena C van Doorn; Monique E van Leerdam; Sjarlot G Kooi; Judith de Waard; Robert F Hoedemaeker; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Sanne M Hulspas; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Anja Wagner; Winand N M Dinjens; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Surveillance colonoscopy improves survival in a cohort of subjects with a single mismatch repair gene mutation.

Authors:  D A Stupart; P A Goldberg; U Algar; R Ramesar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Low frequency of BRAF and CDKN2A mutations in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Helga B Salvesen; Rajiv Kumar; Ingunn Stefansson; Sabrina Angelini; Nicola MacDonald; Johanna Smeds; Ian J Jacobs; Kari Hemminki; Soma Das; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Wendy Frankel; Jenny Panescu; Janet Lockman; Kaisa Sotamaa; Daniel Fix; Ilene Comeras; Jennifer La Jeunesse; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Judith A Westman; Thomas W Prior; Mark Clendenning; Pamela Penzone; Janet Lombardi; Patti Dunn; David E Cohn; Larry Copeland; Lynne Eaton; Jeffrey Fowler; George Lewandowski; Luis Vaccarello; Jeffrey Bell; Gary Reid; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Testing women with endometrial cancer to detect Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Janice S Kwon; Jenna L Scott; C Blake Gilks; Molly S Daniels; Charlotte C Sun; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Point: justification for Lynch syndrome screening among all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Heather Hampel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system.

Authors:  James M Gudgeon; Janet L Williams; Randall W Burt; Wade S Samowitz; Gregory L Snow; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Genetic instability of microsatellites in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  J I Risinger; A Berchuck; M F Kohler; P Watson; H T Lynch; J Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Lynch syndrome screening strategies among newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Kimberly Resnick; J Michael Straughn; Floor Backes; Heather Hampel; Kellie S Matthews; David E Cohn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaëtan Des Guetz; Olivier Schischmanoff; Patrick Nicolas; Gérard-Yves Perret; Jean-François Morere; Bernard Uzzan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  23 in total

1.  Using Somatic Mutations from Tumors to Classify Variants in Mismatch Repair Genes.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Eric Q Konnick; Sarah Upham; Tom Walsh; John Michael O Ranola; Angela L Jacobson; Mary-Claire King; Rachel Pearlman; Heather Hampel; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: perspectives of Canadian pathologists and genetic counselors.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dicks; Daryl Pullman; Ken Kao; Andrée MacMillan; Charlene Simmonds; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-11-21

3.  Selective Versus Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome: A Six-Year Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Trilokesh D Kidambi; Amie Blanco; Megan Myers; Peggy Conrad; Kate Loranger; Jonathan P Terdiman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Care delivery considerations for widespread and equitable implementation of inherited cancer predisposition testing.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anita Y Kinney; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Rita D DeBate; Tuya Pal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil; Julie Baldwin; Heather Hampel; Rita D DeBate
Journal:  J Mix Methods Res       Date:  2015-02-25

7.  Successful implementation of Lynch syndrome screening in a safety net institution.

Authors:  Trilokesh D Kidambi; Robin Lee; Jonathan P Terdiman; Lukejohn Day
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-07-02

8.  Creation of a network to promote universal screening for Lynch syndrome: the LynchSyndrome Screening Network.

Authors:  Sarah Mange; Cecelia Bellcross; Deborah Cragun; Deb Duquette; Lisa Gorman; Heather Hampel; Kory Jasperson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Stakeholders' views of integrating universal tumour screening and genetic testing for colorectal and endometrial cancer into routine oncology.

Authors:  Rosie O'Shea; Nicole M Rankin; Maira Kentwell; Margaret Gleeson; Katherine M Tucker; Heather Hampel; Natalie Taylor; Sarah Lewis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: Assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Jamilyn M Zepp; Mari J Gilmore; James V Davis; Elizabeth J Esterberg; Kristin R Muessig; Susan K Peterson; Sapna Syngal; Louise S Acheson; Georgia L Wiesner; Jacob A Reiss; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.