Literature DB >> 27429602

Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness.

Deborah Cragun1, Tuya Pal1, Susan T Vadaparampil1, Julie Baldwin2, Heather Hampel3, Rita D DeBate2.   

Abstract

Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was developed over 25 years ago to bridge the qualitative and quantitative research gap. Upon searching PubMed and the Journal of Mixed Methods Research, this review identified 30 original research studies that utilized QCA. Perceptions that QCA is complex and provides few relative advantages over other methods may be limiting QCA adoption. Thus, to overcome these perceptions, this article demonstrates how to perform QCA using data from fifteen institutions that implemented universal tumor screening (UTS) programs to identify patients at high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer. In this example, QCA revealed a combination of conditions unique to effective UTS programs. Results informed additional research and provided a model for improving patient follow-through after a positive screen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RE-AIM; configurational comparative method; cross-case comparison; effectiveness; evaluation

Year:  2015        PMID： 27429602      PMCID： PMC4941817          DOI： 10.1177/1558689815572023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mix Methods Res        ISSN： 1558-6898


  18 in total

1.  Mixing qualitative methods: quality assurance or qualitative quagmire?

Authors:  R S Barbour
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  1998-05

Review 2.  Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Shona Agarwal; David Jones; Bridget Young; Alex Sutton
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-01

3.  Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Lisa M Klesges; David A Dzewaltowski; Paul A Estabrooks; Thomas M Vogt
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-08-31

4.  Environmental contingencies and genetic propensities: social capital, educational continuation, and dopamine receptor gene DRD2.

Authors:  Michael J Shanahan; Stephen Vaisey; Lance D Erickson; Andrew Smolen
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2008

5.  How helpful is age at colorectal cancer onset in finding HNPCC?

Authors:  Patrick M Lynch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next?

Authors:  P A Thoits
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995

7.  Reflex immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing of colorectal tumors for Lynch syndrome among US cancer programs and follow-up of abnormal results.

Authors:  Laura C Beamer; Marcia L Grant; Carin R Espenschied; Kathleen R Blazer; Heather L Hampel; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Deborah J MacDonald
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Implementing screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: summary of a public health/clinical collaborative meeting.

Authors:  Cecelia A Bellcross; Sara R Bedrosian; Elvan Daniels; Debra Duquette; Heather Hampel; Kory Jasperson; Djenaba A Joseph; Celia Kaye; Ira Lubin; Laurence J Meyer; Michele Reyes; Maren T Scheuner; Sheri D Schully; Leigha Senter; Sherri L Stewart; Jeanette St Pierre; Judith Westman; Paul Wise; Vincent W Yang; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Comparing universal Lynch syndrome tumor-screening programs to evaluate associations between implementation strategies and patient follow-through.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Rita D DeBate; Susan T Vadaparampil; Julie Baldwin; Heather Hampel; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 8.822
View more
  17 in total

1.  Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Key Informant Interviews in Health Services Research: Enhancing a Study of Adjuvant Therapy Use in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Daniel Walker; Alexandra D Moss; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Mixed-Method Tool for Complex Implementation Questions.

Authors:  Laura G Hill; Brittany Rhoades Cooper; Louise A Parker
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2019-02

Review 3.  Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations.

Authors:  Lawrence A Palinkas; Sapna J Mendon; Alison B Hamilton
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda F Petrik; Edward J Miech; Brittany Younger; Anne L Escaron; Jennifer S Rivelli; Jamie H Thompson; Denis Nyongesa; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Opening the black box between governance and management: A mechanism-based explanation of how governance affects the management of endangered species.

Authors:  Raphael Anammasiya Ayambire; Jeremy Pittman
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.943

6.  Strategy Configurations Directly Linked to Higher Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Starts: An Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Vera Yakovchenko; Edward J Miech; Matthew J Chinman; Maggie Chartier; Rachel Gonzalez; JoAnn E Kirchner; Timothy R Morgan; Angela Park; Byron J Powell; Enola K Proctor; David Ross; Thomas J Waltz; Shari S Rogal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green; Jennifer Schneider; Edward J Miech; Jennifer Coury; Sally Retecki; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Implementing Community-Created Self-Management Support Tools in Primary Care Practices: Multimethod Analysis From the INSTTEPP Study.

Authors:  Douglas H Fernald; Matthew J Simpson; Donald E Nease; David L Hahn; Amanda E Hoffmann; LeAnn C Michaels; Lyle J Fagnan; Jeanette M Daly; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2018-10-29

9.  DESKK Study - Development and testing of a dementia-specific respite care concept with a mobility and counselling programme: study protocol.

Authors:  Steffen Heinrich; Christoph Cavazzini; Bernhard Holle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Implementing universal Lynch syndrome screening (IMPULSS): protocol for a multi-site study to identify strategies to implement, adapt, and sustain genomic medicine programs in different organizational contexts.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Deborah Cragun; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Mara M Epstein; Jan Lowery; Christine Y Lu; Pamala A Pawloski; Ravi N Sharaf; Su-Ying Liang; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; James M Gudgeon; Jing Hao; Susan Snyder; Radhika Gogoi; Ilene Ladd; Marc S Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.655
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.