Literature DB >> 21851136

Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system.

James M Gudgeon1, Janet L Williams, Randall W Burt, Wade S Samowitz, Gregory L Snow, Marc S Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the current state of evidence and apply simulation modeling to support decision making about provision and coverage of a Lynch syndrome (LS) screening program among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in our integrated healthcare delivery system. STUDY
DESIGN: Application of multiple methods for synthesizing evidence guided by needs of our clinical and administrative decision makers.
METHODS: Narrative and focused reviews, computerized simulation models of multiple screening options, queries of our electronic data warehouse, and extensive communication with decision makers.
RESULTS: Review of published evidence at the time of the study period revealed that screening unselected CRC patients for LS would likely cost less than $25,000 per life-year saved (compared with no screening) and that screening with immunohistochemistry is substantially more efficient than other options. Our simulation models suggest that not only does including BRAF mutation testing substantially improve efficiency but that adding methylation testing improves it further. We characterized a variety of other metrics that contributed not only to local decisions but to the broader evidence base on this topic.
CONCLUSION: The current state of evidence at the time of the study period suggests an LS screening program can be both effective in reducing mortality from CRC and cost-effective. However, direct evidence remains limited and multiple factors could threaten success of such a program. We have identified opportunities for optimizing the efficiency of available screening protocols. While there was enough evidence for our system to proceed with an LS screening program, we recognize the threats to program success and will prospectively collect outcome data supporting empirical examination of the program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21851136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  25 in total

1.  Multilevel research and the challenges of implementing genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Ralph J Coates; Mary L Fennell; Russell E Glasgow; Maren T Scheuner; Sheri D Schully; Marc S Williams; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

2.  Current Lynch syndrome tumor screening practices: a survey of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Cost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Matro; Karen J Ruth; Yu-Ning Wong; Katen C McCully; Christina M Rybak; Neal J Meropol; Michael J Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Rita D DeBate; Tuya Pal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Screening for germline mismatch repair mutations following diagnosis of sebaceous neoplasm.

Authors:  Jessica N Everett; Victoria M Raymond; Monica Dandapani; Monica Marvin; Wendy Kohlmann; Anu Chittenden; Erika Koeppe; Shanna L Gustafson; Tobias Else; Douglas R Fullen; Timothy M Johnson; Sapna Syngal; Stephen B Gruber; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 6.  Universal Screening of Colorectal Cancers for Lynch Syndrome: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Stephen M Vindigni; Andrew M Kaz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Influence of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of screening for lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Miriam Kuppermann; Benjamin Kim; Kathryn A Phillips; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Mujde Z Erten; Luca P Fernandez; Hank K Ng; Wendy C McKinnon; Brandie Heald; Christopher J Koliba; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Impact of age cutoffs on a lynch syndrome screening program.

Authors:  James M Gudgeon; Thomas W Belnap; Janet L Williams; Marc S Williams
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 10.  Economic evidence on identifying clinically actionable findings with whole-genome sequencing: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michael P Douglas; Uri Ladabaum; Mark J Pletcher; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.