Julie H Harreld1, Kathleen J Helton2, Roland N Kaddoum3, Wilburn E Reddick2, Yimei Li4, John O Glass2, Rakhee Sansgiri2, Qing Ji2, Tianshu Feng4, Mary Edna Parish3, Amar Gajjar5, Zoltan Patay2. 1. Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, MS 220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA. julie.harreld@stjude.org. 2. Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, MS 220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA. 5. Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The effects of anesthesia are infrequently considered when interpreting pediatric perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The objectives of this study were to test for measurable differences in MR measures of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) between non-sedated and propofol-sedated children, and to identify influential factors. METHODS: Supratentorial cortical CBF and CBV measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in 37 children (1.8-18 years) treated for infratentorial brain tumors receiving propofol (IV, n = 19) or no sedation (NS, n = 18) were compared between groups and correlated with age, hematocrit (Hct), end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂), dose, weight, and history of radiation therapy (RT). The model most predictive of CBF and CBV was identified by multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory CBF were significantly lower, and MCA territory CBV greater (p = 0.03), in IV than NS patients (p = 0.01, 0.04). The usual trend of decreasing CBF with age was reversed with propofol in ACA and MCA territories (r = 0.53, r = 0.47; p < 0.05). ACA and MCA CBF (r = 0.59, 0.49; p < 0.05) and CBV in ACA, MCA, and posterior cerebral artery territories (r = 0.73, 0.80, 0.52; p < 0.05) increased with weight in propofol-sedated children, with no significant additional influence from age, ETCO₂, hematocrit, or RT. CONCLUSION: In propofol-sedated children, usual age-related decreases in CBF were reversed, and increases in CBF and CBV were weight-dependent, not previously described. Weight-dependent increases in propofol clearance may diminish suppression of CBF and CBV. Prospective study is required to establish anesthetic-specific models of CBF and CBV in children.
INTRODUCTION: The effects of anesthesia are infrequently considered when interpreting pediatric perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The objectives of this study were to test for measurable differences in MR measures of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) between non-sedated and propofol-sedated children, and to identify influential factors. METHODS: Supratentorial cortical CBF and CBV measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in 37 children (1.8-18 years) treated for infratentorial brain tumors receiving propofol (IV, n = 19) or no sedation (NS, n = 18) were compared between groups and correlated with age, hematocrit (Hct), end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂), dose, weight, and history of radiation therapy (RT). The model most predictive of CBF and CBV was identified by multiple linear regression. RESULTS:Anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory CBF were significantly lower, and MCA territory CBV greater (p = 0.03), in IV than NSpatients (p = 0.01, 0.04). The usual trend of decreasing CBF with age was reversed with propofol in ACA and MCA territories (r = 0.53, r = 0.47; p < 0.05). ACA and MCA CBF (r = 0.59, 0.49; p < 0.05) and CBV in ACA, MCA, and posterior cerebral artery territories (r = 0.73, 0.80, 0.52; p < 0.05) increased with weight in propofol-sedated children, with no significant additional influence from age, ETCO₂, hematocrit, or RT. CONCLUSION: In propofol-sedated children, usual age-related decreases in CBF were reversed, and increases in CBF and CBV were weight-dependent, not previously described. Weight-dependent increases in propofol clearance may diminish suppression of CBF and CBV. Prospective study is required to establish anesthetic-specific models of CBF and CBV in children.
Authors: K L Leenders; D Perani; A A Lammertsma; J D Heather; P Buckingham; M J Healy; J M Gibbs; R J Wise; J Hatazawa; S Herold Journal: Brain Date: 1990-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: C Chiron; C Raynaud; B Mazière; M Zilbovicius; L Laflamme; M C Masure; O Dulac; M Bourguignon; A Syrota Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M Fuss; F Wenz; R Scholdei; M Essig; J Debus; M V Knopp; M Wannenmacher Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kaike K Kaisti; Jaakko W Långsjö; Sargo Aalto; Vesa Oikonen; Hannu Sipilä; Mika Teräs; Susanna Hinkka; Liisa Metsähonkala; Harry Scheinin Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Vera C Keil; Nolan S Hartkamp; Daniel J A Connolly; Giovanni Morana; Marjolein H G Dremmen; Henk J M M Mutsaerts; Maarten H Lequin Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-11-17
Authors: Hadeel Halalsheh; Sue C Kaste; Fariba Navid; Armita Bahrami; Barry L Shulkin; Bhaskar Rao; Michelle Kunkel; Nathan Artz; Alberto Pappo Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-08-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: J H Harreld; N D Sabin; M G Rossi; R Awwad; W E Reddick; Y Yuan; J O Glass; Q Ji; A Gajjar; Z Patay Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Chih-Yang Hsu; Yimei Li; Yuanyuan Han; Lucas Elijovich; Noah D Sabin; Tarek Abuelem; Radmehr Torabi; Austin Faught; Chia-Ho Hua; Paul Klimo; Thomas E Merchant; John T Lucas Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ulrike Löbel; Nils Daniel Forkert; Peter Schmitt; Thorsten Dohrmann; Maria Schroeder; Tim Magnus; Stefan Kluge; Christina Weiler-Normann; Xiaoming Bi; Jens Fiehler; Jan Sedlacik Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ji Young Ha; Young Hun Choi; Seunghyun Lee; Yeon Jin Cho; Jung Eun Cheon; In One Kim; Woo Sun Kim Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.500