| Literature DB >> 31132824 |
Ji Young Ha1, Young Hun Choi2,3, Seunghyun Lee2, Yeon Jin Cho2,4, Jung Eun Cheon2,4,5, In One Kim2,4,5, Woo Sun Kim2,4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between cerebral blood flow (CBF) on arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI and the degree of postoperative revascularization assessed on digital subtraction angiography in children with moyamoya disease (MMD).Entities:
Keywords: Angiography; Arterial spin labeling; Cerebral blood flow; Cerebral perfusion; Moyamoya; Pediatric
Year: 2019 PMID: 31132824 PMCID: PMC6536794 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500
Fig. 1Imaging example of ROI placement for CBF measurements in ASL images.
A. ROIs created manually over MCA territory along level of centrum semi-ovale on operated side and contralateral side. B. Additional ROIs drawn in cerebellum for normalization on right and left cerebellar hemispheres. Absolute CBFCbll was defined as mean of right and left CBFCbll. ASL = arterial spin labeling, CBF = cerebral blood flow, CBFCbll = CBF of cerebellum, MCA = middle cerebral artery, ROI = region of interest
Clinical Data and Imaging Findings
| Category | No. of Patients |
|---|---|
| Mean age (range) | 8.4 ± 3.6 years (3–16 years) |
| Sex (male:female) | 9:12 |
| Ethnic origin | Asian (Korean) |
| Underlying disease* | None |
| Family history | 1/21 (grandmother; MMD) |
| Clinical symptom (%) | |
| TIA | 16/21 (76.2) |
| Headache | 6/21 (28.6) |
| Involuntary movement | 1/21 (4.8) |
| Seizure | 2/21 (9.5) |
| Persistent weakness | 2/21 (9.5) |
| Lesion on MRI (%) | |
| None | 12/21 (57.1) |
| Infarction | 6/21 (28.6) |
| ICH or IVH | 2/21 (9.5) |
| Cerebral hemi-atrophy | 1/21 (4.8) |
| PCA involvement | 6/21 |
| Surgery side (right:left) | 11:10 |
| Initial surgery | |
| EDAS only | 13/21 |
| EDAS with EG(P)S | 8/21 |
| Postop. outcome | |
| Postop. infarction | 4/21 |
| Postop. SDH | 1/21; second surgery needed |
*Underlying disease such as neurofibromatosis type 1 and Down syndrome, etc. EDAS = encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis, EG(P) S = encephalogaleo (periosteal) synangiosis, ICH = intracerebral hematoma, IVH = intraventricular hemorrhage, MMD = moyamoya disease, PCA = posterior cerebral artery, Postop. = postoperative, SDH = subdural hemorrhage, TIA = transient ischemic attack
Comparison between Pre- and Postoperative CBF Values in Patients (n = 21) Who Underwent Unilateral Revascularization Based on ASL Measurements for Each Reader
| Reader | Parameter | Preoperative ASL | Postoperative ASL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Absolute CBF* | |||
| Operated side | 79.33 ± 31.15 | 89.99 ± 25.48 | 0.020 | |
| Contralateral side | 88.02 ± 33.92 | 80.72 ± 29.88 | 0.145 | |
| Cerebellum† | 52.62 ± 12.53 | 48.51 ± 9.58 | 0.123 | |
| nCBF‡ | ||||
| Operated side | 1.53 ± 0.53 | 1.89 ± 0.49 | 0.001 | |
| Contralateral side | 1.73 ± 0.73 | 1.72 ± 0.67 | 0.944 | |
| R2 | Absolute CBF | |||
| Operated side | 80.66 ± 31.18 | 88.19 ± 22.16 | 0.115 | |
| Contralateral side | 88.76 ± 34.48 | 80.02 ± 32.02 | 0.118 | |
| Cerebellum | 52.65 ± 13.04 | 48.96 ± 9.44 | 0.178 | |
| nCBF | ||||
| Operated side | 1.55 ± 0.51 | 1.84 ± 0.46 | 0.001 | |
| Contralateral side | 1.74 ± 0.73 | 1.69 ± 0.71 | 0.651 | |
| R3 | Absolute CBF | |||
| Operated side | 80.78 ± 32.78 | 89.98 ± 24.28 | 0.070 | |
| Contralateral side | 89.29 ± 35.24 | 81.05 ± 30.88 | 0.124 | |
| Cerebellum | 52.04 ± 12.13 | 48.30 ± 8.74 | 0.125 | |
| nCBF | ||||
| Operated side | 1.57 ± 0.54 | 1.89 ± 0.49 | 0.001 | |
| Contralateral side | 1.77 ± 0.75 | 1.73 ± 0.71 | 0.702 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation. Absolute or nCBF values were compared between pre- and postoperative ASL using paired t test. *Data are in units of mL per 100 g per minute, †Absolute CBFCbll was defined as mean of right and left CBFCbll, ‡nCBF values are calculated as follows: CBFMCA/CBFCbll. ASL = arterial spin labeling, CBF = cerebral blood flow, CBFCbll = CBF of cerebellum, CBFMCA = CBF value in the MCA territory, MCA = middle cerebral artery, nCBF = normalized CBF
Fig. 2Graph displaying nCBF changes measured with ASL according to angiographic revascularization degree
(poor revascularization [grade 1], −0.043 ± 0.212; fair revascularization [grade 2], 0.345 ± 0.176; good revascularization [grade 3], 0.453 ± 0.182 [p = 0.001]). nCBF = normalized CBF
Relationship between Angiographic Postoperative Revascularization Degree and Change in nCBF Value
| Parameter | Reader | Grade 1 (n = 4)* | Grade 2 (n = 7) | Grade 3 (n = 10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆nCBF† | R1 | −0.054 ± 0.302 | 0.395 ± 0.176 | 0.495 ± 0.256 | 0.005 |
| R2 | −0.039 ± 0.248 | 0.285 ± 0.158 | 0.416 ± 0.182 | 0.003 | |
| R3 | −0.037 ± 0.154 | 0.356 ± 0.262 | 0.447 ± 0.202 | 0.005 | |
| Average‡ | −0.043 ± 0.212 | 0.345 ± 0.176 | 0.453 ± 0.182 | 0.001 | |
| Tukey HSD test§ | Group 1 and 2 | 0.010 | |||
| Group 2 and 3 | 0.448 | ||||
| Group 1 and 3 | 0.001 | ||||
Revascularization grading was evaluated via digital subtraction angiography imaging (baseline and postoperative follow-up image) in MCA territory. *Grade 1, poor (area perfused by synangiosis is less than 1/3 of MCA territory); 2, fair (area perfused by synangiosis is between 1/3 and 2/3 of MCA territory); 3, good (area perfused by synangiosis is greater than 2/3 of MCA territory), †Change in nCBF values is calculated as follows: ΔnCBF = postoperative nCBF - preoperative nCBF, ‡Values averaged across three readers for ΔnCBF values, §Post-hoc Tukey HSD test for averaged ΔnCBF values across three readers. HSD = honestly significant difference
Fig. 3Representative DSA and ASL images showing good postoperative outcome in 12-year-old girl with unilateral MMD who underwent right EDAS with right EC(P)S.
A. Baseline DSA image showing lateral projection from right external carotid injections. B. Postoperative DSA image after surgery shows superficial temporal artery hypertrophy (arrow) and abundant collateral flow at greater than 2/3 of MCA territory; grade 3, good revascularization grade. C. Baseline ASL image shows decreased perfusion and ATA signals (arrowheads) reflecting late-arriving flow via collateral pathways. D. Postoperative ASL image shows increased perfusion with decreased ATA signals in right MCA territory, corresponding to DSA results. ATA = arterial transit artifact, DSA = digital subtraction angiography, EC(P)S = encephalogaleo (periosteal) synangiosis, EDAS = encephaloduroarteriosynangios is, MMD = moyamoya disease
Fig. 4Representative DSA and ASL images showing poor postoperative outcome in 16-year-old girl with bilateral MMD who underwent right EDAS with bifrontal EC(P)S.
A. Baseline DSA image showing lateral projection from right external carotid injections demonstrates preexisting transdural collaterals, indicating advanced stage of disease. B. Postoperative DSA image shows impaired collateral flow at less than 1/3 of MCA territory; grade 1, poor revascularization grade. C. Baseline ASL image shows decreased perfusion in both MCA territories. D. Postoperative ASL image shows impaired perfusion, corresponding to DSA results.
Contingency Table for Interobserver Agreement of CBF Measured by Three Readers
| Parameter | Location | ICC (95% CI)* |
|---|---|---|
| Preoperative CBF | MCA territory | |
| Right | 0.97 (0.954–0.997) | |
| Left | 0.94 (0.887–0.976) | |
| Cerebellum | ||
| Right | 0.96 (0.942–0.995) | |
| Left | 0.95 (0.910–0.983) | |
| Postoperative CBF | MCA territory | |
| Right | 0.92 (0.853–0.952) | |
| Left | 0.96 (0.942–0.998) | |
| Cerebellum | ||
| Right | 0.91 (0.845–0.956) | |
| Left | 0.94 (0.871–0.977) |
*ICC were calculated for interobserver agreement for three readers. CI = confidence interval, ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient